Employee Job Satisfaction Has A Large Impact On Their Organization

carefully planned out and considered, the total closure or failure of the organization could be at hand in the near future. In our modern age, employers know that salary is not the only factor that should be considered and that salary alone will not lead to better or more highly profitable workers alone. This is why compensation planning is important and why pay should have some connection between performance and compensation. This is why the human resources department should consider many monetary and non-monetary factors when considering how to properly compensate and motivate employees (Dessler, 2013).

The first lesson we learnt was the importance of treating employees fairly, especially in terms of wages. Employees who are content and treated fairly are productive and will evidently drive the bottom line of the company. Their productivity will be high, knowing their wage is reflective of their work and they feel valued in the company. Not only did employees experience pay dissatisfaction if they perceived their pay as unfair, they were also less motivated to achieve the organization’s goals. (HRM 212) In Quarter 6, we increased the wages for Level 3,4, and 5 workers. However, we received feedback that notified us that our Level 1 workers

Organizations that are serious about making improvements are going to have to deal with the issue of job satisfaction. Job satisfaction can be best described as the positive feeling that an individual has about their job resulting from an evaluation of the job’s characteristics (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p.31). It would seem natural to think that job satisfaction would have a positive correlation with successful organizations. What impact does job satisfaction have on an organization? Research will show that there are not only internal effects from performance related issues, but also external effects that impact customer satisfaction.

For years, management researchers and practitioners have tried to find out the impact of employee job satisfaction on organizational effectiveness. They wanted to know whether job dissatisfaction would lead to decline in employee output and, consequently, organizational performance. They analyzed the outcomes of job satisfaction by studying the relationship between job satisfaction and various other organizational aspects such as productivity, turnover, absenteeism, etc.

There are five major components of job satisfaction, one being monetary benefits (Ghillyer 2010). According to Ghillyer (2012) an employee’s behavior towards their pay may affect their work performance. The issue that arises with employee motivation is that management is unable to satisfy all (Ghillyer 2010). This becomes an even larger problem when employees being joining unions, resigning and being frequently absent (Ghillyer 2010).

The challenges of an organization can influence the performance of an organization from a satisfaction with pay (Gomez-Mejia, Balkin, & Cardy, 2016, p. 296). The employee salary within an organization is a huge cause for turnover of employees (p. 296). First, the topic of employee salary is of great importance for the current and potential workforce (Lee & Lin, 2014, p. 1577). In addition, employees that have the perception on receiving lower compensation that others within their market will lack in performance and have a desire to leave the organization (p. 1577). In retrospect, the regular evaluation of compensation within the organization is vital to the reduction of employee turnover (p. 1577).

Job satisfaction can be known to some people as an important element in their lives. If an individual is unhappy with their occupation it may affect other parts of their life. Job satisfaction can be seen in what one wants in a job as to what one has in their current job.

Although Employee Engagement does have some basic overlapping with some basic management theories like commitment, ‘organisational citizenship behaviour’, job involvement and job satisfaction, it still holds some substantial difference in this approach.

Have you ever felt like you needed a change at work? At one point during that exact same job you felt excited about waking up and going to work? These feelings are normal and all have to do with your job satisfaction. What is job satisfaction? Judge (2013) defines this as “A positive feeling about one’s job resulting from an evaluation of its characteristics” (p.74). We are going to explore three different people with three different job satisfaction levels, characteristics of their jobs that lead to increased levels of satisfaction, characteristics of their jobs that lead to reduced levels of satisfaction, and how their job satisfaction relates to job performance, citizenship behavior, turnover, and company profit.

Benefits play a major role towards employee satisfaction and how they behave in an organization. Employee satisfaction is necessary for the success of any organization. Keeping employee satisfaction should be a priority for every employer. There are many reasons why an employee can become discouraged with their jobs. Some include: lack of communication within the organization, high stress levels, lack of recognition, or limit opportunity for growth.

‘Job satisfaction is not just about job conditions. Personality also plays a role. Research has shown that people who have positive core self-evaluations—who believe in their inner worth and basic competence—are more satisfied with their jobs than those with negative core self-evaluations. They not only see their work as more fulfilling and challenging but also are more likely to gravitate towards challenging jobs in the first place. Those with negative core self-evaluations set less ambitious goals and are more likely to give up when confronting difficulties. Thus, they are more likely to be stuck in boring, repetitive jobs than those with positive core self-evaluations.’

Robinson and Hay (2003) mentioned employee engagement as an evolution of past research which focuses on employee satisfaction, motivational approaches and commitment. This is a modernized version of job satisfaction. According to Robert J. Vance (2006), employees who are engaged in their work and committed to their organizations give companies crucial competitive advantage- including higher productivity and lower employee turnover. Now-a-days the companies’ objective is to retain the best talents and manage their performance for increasing company’s productivity and revenue.

Based on the fulfilment an individual contains towards their work is job satisfaction. The productivity could either be positive or negative while the relationship between the productivity and satisfaction may not be consistent. There are multiple internal and external factors of job satisfaction that can impact the behavior of an employee and engagement over time. The way the worker’s attitude concerning their field effects the performance they perform on a daily basis. One who is satisfied with the job they maintain, succeed at what they do. “It is therefore imperative for a company to understand the attitude of its workers and measure the job satisfaction of its employees, as job satisfaction is essential for productivity” (L. Bradshaw

Job satisfaction benefits the organization includes reduction in complaints and grievances, absenteeism, turnover, and termination; as well as improved punctuality and worker morale. Job satisfaction is also linked with a healthier work force and has been found to be a good indicator of longevity.

Job satisfaction is one criterion for establishing the strength of an organization; description effective services largely depends on the human source (Fitzgerald et al., 1994) and job satisfaction experienced by employees will affect the quality of service they render. The job satisfaction is look on their job performance. Job satisfaction has been defined as a positive emotional state resulting from the pleasure a worker derives from the job and as the affective and cognitive attitudes held by an employee about various aspects of their work.