Employee Satisfaction, Efficiency And The Training

Organizations that are serious about making improvements are going to have to deal with the issue of job satisfaction. Job satisfaction can be best described as the positive feeling that an individual has about their job resulting from an evaluation of the job’s characteristics (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p.31). It would seem natural to think that job satisfaction would have a positive correlation with successful organizations. What impact does job satisfaction have on an organization? Research will show that there are not only internal effects from performance related issues, but also external effects that impact customer satisfaction.

Some ways to do this are by having a formal system of recognition for high quality work, longer periods of service, and small tokens of appreciation. One way to achieve higher employee satisfaction is to communicate clearly about expectations. Coaching and mentoring individual employees based on their specific needs will be an absolute must.

Job satisfaction comes from the attitude that employees have towards their work. There is a close relationship between the degree of satisfaction and the motivation level of employees. Explaining that if there is a lack of motivation in the workplace, it is likely due to a lack

Job satisfaction is one of the topics that have been studied repeatedly over the past decades and is expected to continue as a topic of interest since the studies of turnover continue (Omar, Abdul Majid, & Johari, 2013). Job satisfaction can be defined in many different ways, one of which is

In recent years, less Americans consider themselves satisfied at their workplace than in earlier decades (Mckeown, 2010). Organizations see employee satisfaction as one of the most important factors in an employee leaving voluntarily. There are many factors that can affect job satisfaction. Some of these include good structure in the organization and opportunity for advancement (Mitchell et al.,2001) Plateauing, a dead end feeling that happens when an employee cannot advance further in an organization, is a factor that can lead to job dissatisfaction (Allen et al., 1999). High Turnover rates can indicate dissatisfaction with a worker 's position or pay; there are little opportunities

Through-out this essay the notion of satisfied employees being more productive will be broken down and examined, taking into consideration research and theories, to determine if there is any correlation between the two elements, and if so, to what extent. Locke (1976) defines “job satisfaction as pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experience… a perception of how well their job provides those things that are viewed as important.” The feeling of satisfaction is an attitude, “a psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favour or disfavour” (Eagly and Chaiken, 1993) favour being the satisfaction the employee feels. “While in its purest

1. Although it is clear employees are not especially satisfied with their work, do you think this is a reason for concern? Does research suggest satisfied workers are actually better at their jobs? Are any other behavioral outcomes associated with job satisfaction?

Managers today are finding it harder to ignore the job satisfaction issue, especially at a time when the demand of meaningful work is increasing. There are two main reasons why managers are concerned with job satisfaction. One of the reasons is that managers have a moral responsibility to do what they can to provide employees with a satisfying work environment (Ramayah, Jantan, & Tadisnia, 2001). Another reason is that managers believe that the behavior of satisfied workers will make positive contributions to the organization (Ramayah, Jantan, & Tadisnia, 2001).

It has rightly been said, employee development is the key to organizational sustainable development. Organizations must have employees who are able to quickly adapt to an increasingly-changing world market. Author recommended Companies need to invest in on-going employee training and development in order to both keep employees and be successful. Training enhance employees’ initiative and quality of work, thereby assisting them to be more dedicated to achieving the organizational goals and objectives and in turn enhancing employees’ effectiveness within the organization.

Employee training is the responsibility of the organization. However, Employee development is a shared responsibility of management and the individuals. The role of organizational management in providing effective learning solutions is to

Employees who are satisfied with what they do always tend to establish a desirable work environment, they also prove to be more productive and efficient, and this always results to greater profit, employee retention as well as customer satisfaction. It is important for managers and executives to understand job satisfaction, whatever creates it, the manner in which it should be fixed and the way of managing it. In job satisfaction there are organizational behavioral concerns that relate to it, for example, turnover, absenteeism, customer satisfaction, and workplace deviance and organization citizenship behavior.

Employee job satisfaction and retention happens to be an issue to be debated in terms of attaining an increased degree of productivity within the organization. Job satisfaction is best defined as a set of feelings and emotions employees associate with their work. Theoretically, an organization with employees that display actions of substantial absenteeism as well as turnover due to low levels of job satisfaction would generally suffer from greater recruitment and retraining cost that will hinder profitability. Unfortunately, the majority of businesses have failed to make job satisfaction a top management priority; this particular trend is attributed to the failure to recognize the significant advantages an

In this essay, I will explore the relationship between the level of employee satisfaction and employee production. Firstly defining and explaining satisfaction and job performance as these variables are difficult to define, and a clear definition is critical for assessing the relationship between them. Secondly I will discuss some of the most significant studies in this area of research. I will then analyse various factors which determine the correlation between these two variables, focusing on the attitude-behaviour relationship as this gives an insight into how a higher level of satisfaction may link to greater production. Finally I will look into a set of different models which propose variations to the job satisfaction-performance

Job satisfaction is the very important factor in general quality of life because it is closely connected with working life (e.g. Argyle, 1989; Bang & Lee, 2006), with family life, everyday life, and mental health (Orpen, 1978; Schmitt and Bedeian, 1982; Faragher, Cass & Cooper, 2005). Level of job satisfaction is also highly related to turnover, absenteeism rate, work productivity or accomplishment (Muchinsky, 1977; Organ, 1977). Many researchers (e.g. Cherrington, 1994; Acorn, Ratner & Crawford, 1997; Ostroff, 1992; Spector, 1997) state that employees who experience high job satisfaction contribute to organisational commitment, job involvement, their physical, mental health and overall well-being are improved. Job dissatisfaction on the

Hello, my name is Dan Inness and today I will be talking to you about the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance. The two studies I will use to talk about this relationship are “relationships between facets of job satisfaction and task and contextual Performance” by Bryan Edwards, Suzanne Bell, Winfred Arthur, and Arlette Decuir and “Job satisfaction, organizational stress and employee performance: A study of NAPIMS” by Ajayi Mofoluwake and Abimbola Oluremi.