Employee Turnover

High employee turnover, where workers frequently leave and must be replaced, leads to increased spending on recruitment and training and can indicate management problems. Employees often have good reasons for moving on but if too many are leaving an organisation, can be very disruptive.

In the globalized and changed competitive business world, it is important responsibility to deal with employee turnover for any organization. Effective and efficient management of employee turnover is an essential task to achieve the organizational overhead goals. Significant amount of research has been undertaken to understand the major causes of employee's turnover and retentions mechanisms that organizations should develop, especially in the field of healthcare.

When accounting for the costs (both real costs, such as time taken to select and recruit a replacement, and also opportunity costs, such as lost productivity), the cost of employee turnover to for-profit organizations has been estimated to be between 30% (the figure used by the American Management Association) to upwards of 150% of the employees' remuneration package.[4] There are both direct and indirect costs. Direct costs relate to the leaving costs, replacement costs and transitions costs, and indirect costs relate to the loss of production, reduced performance levels, unnecessary overtime and low morale. The true cost of turnover is going to depend on a number of variable including ease or difficulty in filling the position and the nature of the job itself.

High employee turnover has monetary costs. Though estimates vary, most experts agree that turnover costs, when all things are considered, equals at least 25% of a leaving employee’s annual wages (Silva & Toledo, 2009). For example, for an employee making $25,000 per year, the total turnover costs associated with replacing that employee would be at least $6,250. This includes cost of prescreening measures such as drug tests, background checks, application reviews, interviews, pre-employment training and other recruitment costs (Dolfin, 2006). It also includes implicit cost associated with on the job training and the productivity loss experienced by other employees that must help acclimate new employees to their environment

Retaining employees is one way the turnover rate can decrease, Branham (2000), focuses on retaining valuable employees by incorporating four key elements. The first key elements is, “be a company that people want to work for”. There are many companies that have been labeled as, “employers of choice”. These employers all have something in common, which is how they value their employers (Branham, 2000). They treat their employees with respect and like family. With being an “employer of choice,” people are the most valuable asset; not just customers but employees too. Many companies go above and beyond for their customers, but not for their employees, yet they wonder why they are losing valuable talent.

Having a high employee turnover rate can cost the company more than just people. There are many “costs” physical and opportunity that are included into high employee turnover. The physical costs of high employee turnover is training the new employee, interview expenses, and advertising costs. These are general costs, but when

There are two types of turnover, voluntary turnover happens when the employee makes the decision to leave and involuntary turnover is when employees has no choice in their termination (Schmitz, 2012). Every month or sooner managers experience some of their exceedingly qualified employees leave the company. After realizing that their company is becoming less profitable is when they begin to wonder why and brainstorm on ways to retain them. In Information Technology, “the cost of recruiting new staff is high and the loss of continuity when staff leave can also be very expensive” (Bott, 2005, p. 111). In IT, human resources strive to maintain their highly skilled employees while employees’

All in all, or in the light of the above, our findings support the long-held suspicion or assumption that nursing turnover is excessive to the foundation or institution. A positive and direct relationship between turnover rates and hospital proficiency and efficiency was recognized for both work force costs and non-staff working expenses in the United Doctors Hospital. Alternately, no backing was found for the proposition that a curvilinear relationship exists between turnover rates and organizational efficiency. This example of discoveries is steady with individual level investigations of turnover and their consequences for organizational expenses, proposing a level of contrast between organizationsl and individual level investigations of

The consequences of turnover include both direct and indirect costs to an organization. Direct costs include financial costs associated with an employee leaving, such as subsequent recruiting and training costs. The cost of replacing an employee, including separation, replacement, and subsequent training costs, has been estimated to be 1.5 to 2.5 times an employee’s annual salary. Turnover may also have indirect costs to an organization, such as losing the knowledge and skills of a worker as well as disrupting the established culture. Each employee that leaves takes away some contribution to the larger group and, until the position is appropriately filled; the organization may lose some amount of productivity

Turnover has a negative connotation attached to it, with good reason. Not many people would want to tell someone that they have been fired or that they quit their job because maybe they found it hard or going through something which is stopping them from doing the job. There are many reasons for turnover. Explored in this essay is why people work in the first place. From this information, we can get more details of the reasons for turnover and how Australia compares to other countries. But before exploring that we should look at what turnover is, different types of turnover and is turnover always a bad thing? It is then necessary to look at turnover implications for human resource management (HRM). Lastly, it is helpful to look at identify

A distinction should be drawn between low-performing employees and top performers, and efforts to retain employees should be targeted at valuable, contributing employees. Employee turnover is a symptom of deeper issues that have not been resolved, which may include low employee morale, absence of a clear career path, lack of recognition, poor employee-manager relationships or many other issues. A lack of satisfaction and commitment to the organization can also cause an employee to withdraw and

The employee turnover rate and the retention of skilled employees is a major problem businesses face. “Conservative estimates put the cost of replacing a lost employee at 25 percent of the annual compensation amount. For the typical full time employee who earns $38,481 and receives $50,025 in total compensation, the total cost of turnover would amount to $12,506 per employee.” This being the case employee turnover is a major cost and can significantly influence the bottom line so it should be avoided if possible. (Bliss)

The authors of this article give the misconceptions of employee turnover by systematically breaking down myths that organizations tend to believe cause employees to leave the workplace. The misconceptions are replaced with evidence based strategies that show the underlying factors beyond pay compensation that drive turnover in addition the employee morale. One of the meta-analytical relationships that

Whether it be evidenced through expenditures in agency or search firms, lowered productivity or morale, high turnover costs your company. In fact, each time one of your employees walks out your door for the last time, it can cost your company anywhere from $25,000 for entry level positions, up to $250,000 for a senior level positions.

• To identify the causes of attrition rate applicable to the subjects of the study