Employment Law Case Summary

Therefore, since the Scarpelli, was not given a counselor and his probation was revoked without a hearing, a habeas corpus petition was filed. It was then the District Court acknowledge that revocation of probation without a hearing and counsel was a denial of due process.(Gagnon v. Scarpelli 411 U.S. 773 (1973). (n.d.).The Court of Appeal affirmed that using the same specification for parolee under the Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, in which states that due process is required preliminary and final revocation hearing for probationer case. The hearing will determine if a counsel is needed for an indigent probationer or parolee according to due process requirement in each individual case. However, the state is not obliged to assist in providing a counselor, unless the individual is indigent Nevertheless, it would be wise to assist those that are indigent probationer or parolee in having difficult in sharing their side of the story with the facts when there is no witness or presentation of evidence (United State Supreme Court Gagnon v. Scarpelli, (1973) No. 71-1225, n.d.). It is also, suggested when a request for a counsel is refused, and then the refusal should be written in the

This situation raises concern about my future career goals as the Probation Operation Supervisor. I am now requesting Union or legal representation since this matter seem to involve disciplinary actions and my job at risk. I am being discriminated against, harassed and retaliated for performing my job as a Supervisor by Felicia Hendrix and Amibeth Grandy and those who I have made complaints about in the past. These accusations were never brought my attention from anyone except the office “Gossip Mill.”

There are many employment laws out there but ill discuss about three of them and what are the consequences if the company did not comply. The employment laws I will discuss are the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964, Americans with Disabilities Act 1990, and the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. My next topic would be how an organization might structure their policies, practices and culture to ensure compliance.

On April 14, 2014; the offenders probation complaints were received by the Probation office’s intake department. Thus community supervision had commenced. At that time, he signed the rules and regulations associated with his responsibilities while under community supervision and he was also informed of his stipulations relative to his current probation period.

I am writing to appeal my academic probation at Pierce College Puyallup to further my education. Although i am not surprised i am on the dismissal list since i recognize that my grades fell behind and stayed behind during my 3 first quarters at the campus. Although my grades were low i would like to humbly urge you to reinstate me for further quarters.

On 9/15/2016, CM met with the client for Bi-Weekly ILP Review. Client was dressed appropriately for the weather. She was well groomed. As usual client in the meeting was loquacious, and loud. Client continues to be hostile towards this worker. Client continues to repeat to this worker as quote: "I am not mad with you, and this has nothing to do with you. It's all about DHS and your supervisor." Client was hostile due to an Authorization of Release Form client signed for staff to contact her therapist Dr. Iris Yankelevich for a copy of the client psychosocial and psychiatrist evaluations. Client continues to report that she didn’t signed the Authorization of Release Form because the form stated that the form is for HRA 2010e and she doesn’t know how many time she need to repeat herself that she doesn’t meet the ‘CRITERAI FOR SRO”. CM tries to explain to the client that staff is requesting a copy of her psychosocial and psychiatrist evaluation, but then client continue to talk over CM and threat to contact the Coalition and DHS. Client continues to set in her way and refuses to work with staff to meet her unmet needs. CM observed that the client walk with a book bags and a small shopping cart. Client reported she walk with all her documents and letters from Adult Protective Services & Social Security Administration stating that she is capable of living independently.

One offender was non-compliant with the terms of their parole. They had not been showing up to whatever treatment they were supposed to receive, so they were called in (542-544). The offender claims there was some kind of mix up with the dates of the appointments that were set and that it was the office’s fault for not changing them. This offender was released under supervision, but the Judge threatened to revoke their parole if they continued to not keep up with the treatment. She explained that ultimately it was up to the offender to make sure appointments were changed and that everyone that needed to be notified was made aware.

Review “Montana: Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act” in Chapter 2. Please respond to the following:

Sylvia Burwell Secretary of Health and Human Services Petitioners vs Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation vs Secretary of Health and Human Services (U.S 2014)

The patient was placed on HOLD to see the writer to address his non-compliance with treatment. The patient was reminded about his Step 3 of the patient engagement. According to the patient as the writer reviewed the patient case history of his no show for counseling, group attendance, and continuously AWOL, the patient only response was, " I, know." The writer then inquired of the patient efforts to engage in mental health services through ICRC. The patient admits that he haven't done the intake when the deadline was extended for the third time. The writer discussed with the patient about the risk of facing an intent to discharge due to his non-compliance and addressed alternatives such as suboxone and transferring to a clinic in Massachusetts to accommodate the work location. The patient declines the writer's suggestion as he wants to remain with HCRC-Hartford due to the positive treatment and said. " You guys really care....I do not want to be discharge.....I, mean what is the process of the intent of discharge?" The writer explained to the patient about the appeal process as his record will be reviewed by the Practice Manager to determine as to whether or not to forward with the discharge or the discharge to be overturn.

rogress: On 2/6/17 CPSW received an email from Ms. Messerli's probation officer reporting that Ms. Messerli has not remained law abiding and she has not remained sober. Ms. Messerli was no show to her PO appointment and she did not stay sober. Ms. Messerli has an appointment with her probation on 2/8/17. The probation officer reported that if Ms. Messerli is a no show again to her appointment, she will issue a probation violation for 1). Failing to meet with probation, 2). Failing to complete a Rule 25, 3). Failing to remain law-abiding 4). Failing to remain

In your grievance filed at Lumley Unit, you claim that you previously refused to participate in the GED program because you had already obtained your high school diploma. You further assert that your refusal subjected you to loss of Phase and pay rate. Your resolution is for DO 903 to be revised and allow inmates to receive a pay increase after a previous program refusal.

COMES NOW the Defendant, Josue Emmanuel Rivera-Lemus, by and through counsel, Vernida R. Chaney, and pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Section 6A1. 2 the United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.” or the “Guidelines”), United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540 (4th Cir. 2005), and this Court’s Policy Regarding Procedure to be followed in Sentencing, represents that he has reviewed the Probation Office’s Presentence Investigation Report and submits the Defendant’s Position with Respect to Sentencing to aid the Court in determining an appropriate sentence.

Facts of the case: Imagine you are an HR manager and your boss and owner of the company, Bill, comes to you suspecting his assistant, Paige, is stealing money from the company. Bill would like a polygraph test conducted to see if Paige is stealing from the company. He would also like you to conduct electronic surveillance on Paige’s work e-mail for anything suspicious.

The purpose of this research paper is to discuss about Parole and Probation in America. The paper is going to focus on the past, present and future of parole and probation. This paper includes discussion of Parole and Probation Officers, as well as why some states so longer utilize parole, including Florida. This paper will also include personal input about the topic.