Employment Law Midterm Essay

A) The topic concerning this case is negligence law. The issue is whether Simon would be successful perusing a negligence claim.

than $5.15 an hour. Overtime pay at a rate of not less than one and

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), also known as the Wagner Act, was enacted in Congress in 1935 and became one of the most important legacies of the New Deal. Prior to the passage of the NLRA, employers had been free to spy on, interrogate, discipline, discharge, and blacklist union members. Reversing years of federal opposition, the statute guaranteed the right of employees to organize labor unions, to engage in collective bargaining, and to take part in strikes. The act also created a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to arbitrate deadlocked labor-management disputes, guarantee democratic union elections, and penalize unfair labor practices by employers. The law applied to all employees involved in the interstate

Employment law encompasses remedies that address employee grievances and discrimination that occur in the workplace environment. The foundation of this system is the United States Constitution, which provides two sources of laws and regulations. These two sources are individual state constitutions and the national constitution. Under this system of federalism, there is also the Bill of Rights, which provides the origins of the majority of employment law. The most widely known document is Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et.seq.) The judicial, executive, and legislative branches of the government of the United States create and enforce rules and regulations as promulgated by the constitution. Individuals

In the district court trial, the jury sided with the plaintiff and ruled that the St. Louis Hockey Club was vicariously liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. The trial court agreed with the plaintiff’s argument that as per the doctrine of respondeat superior, the defendant was liable for their employee’s negligent actions that led to the plaintiff’s injuries. As part of their

Charges of workplace discrimination is said to be at an all time high. During the 2015 fiscal year the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity released information that claims there were more than 89,000 charges filed for workplace discrimination. One of the top ten charges is said to be retaliation, which had an estimate 39,757 cases in 2015, which is 44.5 percent of all charges filed. Retaliation is said to be in violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, For the purpose of this research paper I will provide the understanding of both Acts, while also taking a case that deals with to provide the basis of the case, the findings, and the outcome of the charges.

On August 19, 2008, Mr. Contonius Gill filed a Charge of Discrimination with the EEOC claiming race discrimination and retaliation for being discharged for complaining about racial harassment. On August 10, 2008 Mr. Gill filed an Employment Discrimination Complaint with the North Carolina Department of Labor. On June 2011, the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a single complaint alleging that Mr. Gill, plaintiff, was subjected to a racially hostile environment from May 2007 through June 2008, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. The matter was filed against A.G. Widenhouse, defendant.

Trace the history or evolution of this liability through the court. In other words, discuss the relevant cases related to the liability issue and discuss precedent rulings and the current status of the issue.

The aim of this early conciliation is to encourage as many cases as possible to settle ‘compromising’ the claim through a settlement agreement (previously called a ‘compromise agreement’) an agreement achieved through Acas conciliation (a ‘COT3’). Appendix 3 is an early conciliation Flow Chart (ACAS)

Complainant, who is African-American, alleges that Respondent’s employee had a scowl on her face, talked down and attempted to belittle him, but was extremely helpful to a Caucasian customer. Respondent asserts that denies that its employee subjected Complainant to differential terms and conditions based on his race. Respondent asserts that Complainant requested and received the services, in-person hearing regarding his parking tickets, that he requested.

In this scenario the employee takes an un-authorized day off from work to observe her religious holiday. This holiday falls on a day that is during “tax season” and the day off occurred during an incredibly busy period for the company. Prior to this time frame the company announced to all of its employees they were not allowed to take off during

Discrimination is still a serious problem in the workforce today. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits employers from discriminating against an employee’s sex, race, color, national origin, and religion (Bernardin, 2007). The Civil Rights Act was really passed to hold employers accountable for discrimination against African Americas when racism was out of control, and whites refused to see any other race as equal. Today, the law is used by all races that have experienced discrimination.

Laws against discrimination in employment were developed to provide remedies for victims of this unfortunate form of behavior that exists in America today. The following paper provides insight into lawsuits based on discrimination in the areas of age, religion, and disability and the statutes that provide complainants with the ability to seek relief from discriminatory practices.

The American employment laws are designed to foster human dignity and in the process provide employees with various tangible benefits. It is therefore expected for employees to be on the forefront in supporting and adhering to them. Likewise if an organization applies effectively these laws, it can benefit massively from dynamic, healthy, motivated, and productive employees. It therefore goes without saying that managers, just like employees, should promote these laws and thus ensures the organization conforms to them. Generally these laws govern the workplace actions of employers and employees. It ensures a fruitful and legally conducive environment and relationship exists between these two parties, and within employees

This writer will be discussing a case where a male employee files a sexual harassment claim against the employer as the male employee identifies as being gay. He also is filing discrimination on the basis of his gender and alleges retaliation as he was terminated after he had complained about his female coworker. Apparently, the male employee alleged that a female employee while at a dinner and concert after work hours grabbed his privates. It is important to note that the male employee’s performance prior to the incident was declining and was counseled on several occasions by his employer about his declining production. Furthermore, this writer will be discussing whether if the facts could result in liability to the employer for sexual harassment or gender discrimination. Also, this writer will be integrating and referring to various sources and cases that