Two community plan update workshops were held for the Encino-Tarzana Community Plan Area during the month of July. The Encino Community Plan Update workshop was held on Wednesday, July 12, 2017, at the Encino Community Center Women’s Club Room, located at 4935 Balboa Boulevard in Encino. There were approximately 88 community stakeholders in attendance, and 22 City of Los Angeles planners participating as facilitators, note-takers, and greeters at the workshop. The Tarzana Community Plan Update workshop was held on Tuesday, July 27, 2017, at San Fernando Valley Arts & Cultural Center, located at 18312 Oxnard Street in Tarzana. Approximately 44 community stakeholders participated in the workshop, and 22 City of Los Angeles planners staffed the …show more content…
(x18) Regulate the setbacks and height to promote the privacy.
• Housing: Limit condos, multifamily, density, affordable housing, apartment, high density, low-income housing, rental homes, AirBnb for partying, half-way homes and mixed-used. Alleviate the traffic impact of the multifamily specifically in parking and alley entrances, ex: Balboa Blvd and Amestoy Avenue. (x29) Increase density or low/mod income and section 8 housing, affordable housing and mixed-use on major roads such as Ventura, Balboa toward Orange line. (x9)
• Mansionization: Mostly on the eastside of Balboa Blvd and it is not within neighborhood character. Restrict maxing of the square footage, size, scale, and height (No more than 2-story guest houses). Mandate adequate setbacks, yards and spacing. Regulate the home style (no tract home style). (x14)
• Preservation: Preserve Encino, its existing single family and ranch style housing and character. Keep it residential. Prevent subdivision of large lots to multi homes. Maintain low density neighborhood from overdevelopment. Limit size, bulk, and height of new development.
However through urban planning and development, solutions can be discovered and put into action to allow easier flow into urbanism. Transportation issues for example can be resolved by planning for the future of Los Angeles and by investing in the public transportation system. An example of this would be investing in bike paths, lanes, and routes so that people with low income, such as Hispanic immigrants, can travel to their locations in an easier manner through biking. An investment “to fill in gaps and complete the citywide bike plan” for this method of transportation “calls for nearly 1,700 miles of new and upgraded paths and lanes before 2035,” which can seem difficult but possible (Laura J. Nelson). Biking as a new main method of transportation “can help reduce crashes of all types and assist in reaching an ambitious new city goal of eliminating traffic deaths by 2025” (Laura J. Nelson). A solution to gentrification through urban planning is to instead focus on a new method of development called Asset Based Community Development. Through this different urban revitalization process, an inside out approach is taken where development occurs by focusing on the communities’ assets and building upon them, unlike gentrification. When the community is dedicated and determined to rebuild their torn down neighborhoods, it is possible to bring new life to the neighborhood by focusing on assets such
“Not in my back yard” (NIMBY) has reached a point in some communities where it’s difficult to put community facilities anywhere. Some cities are responding by encouraging nursing home construction in specific residential areas based upon density bonuses. Density bonuses are granted for projects in which the developer agrees to include a certain number of affordable housing units. For every one unit of affordable housing a developer agrees to build, there’s a greater number of market rate units. Density bonuses vary from project to project.
There should be an increment or flex pay plan for the residents who are suddenly constrained with higher property taxes. This way they can gradually increase their payments, instead of their payments ballooning at one time. There should be low-interest loans or funding for established small and minority-owned businesses wanting to upgrade their business. The community should be made aware of any funds that will allow them to improve their homes and keep in line with the revitalization.
Gentrification is an existential threat in the Bay Area due to urban renewal, spatial capital, and inequity. This threat can best be described as the process of residential or commercial use of an urban area shifting towards higher economic classes (Center, 199). The process of gentrification has caused many native residents to be displaced from their homes, as well as being forced to move further out of the area or become homeless. Neighborhoods that were once oasis’ for the working class are shifting and becoming too expensive for the people who live there. Food and job insecurity are two forms of inequity that contribute to gentrification practices. These three factors are key in the gentrification that is threatening Bay Area residents.
Inclusionary zoning is a tool to help accomplish affordable housing. The main goal of it is to build a certain percentages of house but to where the houses can be afforded by middle/low income earners. Incentives are provided to act as cost offsets and include density bonuses, tax abatement, and reduced parking charges. Density bonuses motivate developers to have additional units which result in an increased profit margin. On subscription to the inclusionary zoning, benefits accrued eventually lower costs that would have otherwise been charged on the developers. This technique provides a sustainable method of dealing with housing shortage (Dietderich 13). The municipality, however, cannot force developers to set a particular minimum price and therefore the government can only provide incentives to developers to voluntarily provide the units for low-income earners.
Joel: Building Resource Fair event is coming up in September. Home in community services: Kathy and Robin have been involved, first meeting July 1st.
As gentrification of housing stress continues, Local Government Areas (LGA) will lose lower income groups and assimilate into a predominance of higher income groups, effectively homogenizing the population and decreasing diversity. This trend will drive the housing market price up, decrease housing affordability and deter outsiders into joining the community. The existing housing units will experience financial hardships, housing stress, and a gradual deprivation of a means to cope with increasing basic living costs. In order to combat this ongoing issue, speculative approaches by the City have been in consideration.¬¬¬¬
According to Jack Poe, master of science real estate appraisal and state certified real state appraiser in Texas, “According to Babcock’s classic study, the primary effect of Houston’s lack of zoning has been…high income neighborhoods have been preserved by the employment of private covenants and low income neighborhoods have sought in-home commercial development (like a small repair shop) as a way to add value to otherwise low value homes. (Babcock 1966, P. 28).” What all this means to the modern developer in Houston is that they have more freedom to develop what they perceive is needed. The remedy to Houston’s continuing discourse over zoning is a democratic zoning process that is not completely laissez-fair in its approach, as currently exists with the no zoning policy, but remains participatory in order to safeguard the “neighborhood commons” whilst still maintaining this membership and stewardship of the land. The no zoning land policy, as it currently stands in Houston, in part meets Aldo Leopold’s criteria for the land ethic because the citizens are members of the land and it is treated as a shared land-community rather than a commodity controlled by government official(s) or political elites. However, to meet the criteria for the land ethic in whole, it must incorporate a flexible zoning policy that would seek to protect the “neighborhood common” (citizens interests and resources) while still respecting the land-community, which Olmsted values so
In this area there was gangs and trap houses but now there were small businesses and higher income people who were moving in and changing the neighborhood. Gentrification has happened, is happening or will happen in the United States and it is inevitable due to the government supporting it and the power that money has in these regions. Although gentrification does have some pros, it also has some important cons; the first con is the hidden cost that comes with gentrification, the second con is the rents being raised which leads people to becoming homeless. This paper will show the history, effects, benefits, and solutions like putting limits to when and by how much the rent can be raised so that people don’t become homeless. This is not the right time for gentrification because levels of poverty are high and the amount of people in debt is too much for gentrification to occur at this
affordability in the area and create higher density housing with a planned 2,828 new dwellings. It plans to have diverse housing types for all socio economic groups to prevent exclusion and support the economic and social sustainability of the area.
Key planning through such tools as the Greer Community Master Plan and monitoring progress through the National Citizen Survey have proven to be effective as the City of Greer works to improve not only infrastructure but also the quality of life for residents.
The city of Brea is a vibrant and exciting city in the heart of Orange County. With amazing, year-round weather and a forward thinking, community minded municipal government, the city of Brea is one of the most sought after places to live in all of California. Because Brea is one of the most livable cities in all the western United States, the real estate market can be quite competitive. That is why the city of Brea has many new, great housing developments that are adding new, charming and safe neighborhoods to the city and drawing families, seniors and professionals to the community. If you are looking at some of the homes for sale in Brea, you may want to consider looking at the new and exciting
Originally a movement started by artists who moved into these neighborhoods for their affordability, real estate developers and urban planners take advantage of this increased demand for residence as an opportunity to convert once dilapidated buildings into luxury housing units. These once lifeless neighborhoods are given business, increased jobs, and a “safer” atmosphere. However, complying with the basic rules of supply and demand, as demand for housing in these neighborhoods increases, housing prices also go up. As once affordable housing prices hit astronomical rates, lower-income families that once lived in these neighborhoods are eventually forced out when they simply cannot afford to pay rent
Encino and Tarzana Community Plan Update workshops: Two workshops were held to review and participate in shaping land use recommendations affecting the neighborhoods. The workshops were a vital component in the DCP’s engagement with the community on the long range vision for the management of growth and improvement of quality of life within the vibrant community in the Southwest San Fernando Valley. Approximately 150 people signed-in and attend at the workshops throughout the evenings.
Gentrification is a problem that is occurring in many communities. The city of Boyle Heights in East Los Angeles is one of the communities that the citizens of the community are notice new apartments build, galleries owner by rich people, and high prices for apartment the people are not able to afford to live there. Because the renewal of neighborhood environments that transform and attract middle and upper-class households and investors, creating problems for those who cannot afford rises of rents. According to O’Regan, “some of the biggest concerns about gentrification-potential displacement and increased rent burdens-are driven by rent or housing cost increases” (152). The only way to