Energy Synthesis Essay

Dr James Hansen’s argumentative essay, “A Solution to the Climate Problem,” discusses his premise that it is imperative for humankind to deal with carbon dioxide emissions, which he believes needs to be phased out by the mid-21st century. He begins with the current paradigm in government efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and claims that so far it has been a lot of talk and action in the other direction. Dr Hansen argues that while governments pay lip service to agreements such as the Kyoto Accord, they are going full steam ahead with projects that will result in increased carbon dioxide emissions, such as going forth with coal-fired power plants, coal-to-liquids, hydraulic fracturing, and tar sands oil extraction. Dr Hansen believes

Oil, gas, and fossil fuels have been recent controversial issues. There are cleaner forms of energy that could be used, but it is unclear what sources should be used and how to

The argument about man’s role in climate change and the role of government, the role of industry and the role of citizens is a significant challenge that crosses all levels of government, crosses all geopolitical boundaries and crosses all sectors of business. National governments across the globe are dealing with the issue in different ways, but one overarching aspect of control and mitigation can be seen in the oversight and regulation of the electric energy industry. One significant challenge facing each nation is the cost to lower carbon emissions and the question of who will pay the additional cost for compliance. Though the cost issue is significant, a much more difficult question is whether any decision on lowering emissions can make

Our energy use has dramatically improved our lives , but this energy is derived mostly from fossil fuels and has resulted in environmental change , and depletion of fossil fuels (Shahriar 181 ). This leads to continuing military conflict . This resulted in developing and using alternate resources for the increasing energy demand.

The United States currently uses approximately one quarter of the world’s total energy consumption (Toossi). With around 322 million people inhabiting the United States, our population accounts for just fewer than 5% of the total world population. That means that our 5% of the world’s population is using 25% of the world’s energy! Something has to be done.

The United States of America is suffering from a downward trend in competitiveness. From a policymaker’s standpoint, it makes sense for a focus to be on the events most pressing. It could be conceded, however, that a continued dependence on nonrenewable energy could create unwanted ties with extremist nations in the Middle East, while also being a silent killer on the home front. When lawmakers do not take the initiative to make changes in an effort to improve the quality of life and the life expectancy for individuals in a society, it is up to the general public to make this change.

In conclusion, because of boosting the economy, the importance of keeping the earth healthy, and keeping people healthy, it is in America’s best interest to start pushing the use of cleaner energy

There needs to be integration on all levels of society and among the various stakeholders in order to have any hope of restricting warming to 1.5-2 degrees Celsius, therefor limiting the disastrous potential impacts. This report will detail and inventory some of the most ambitious climate action plans and applied policies from a selection of the most influential and innovative cities, businesses, and universities in the world. Data collected from policies around the world as well as emissions targets relay the actions already in place. Additionally, an analysis of the methods within California and Sweden in terms of GHG emissions, reductions targets and

Since the industrial revolution began, humans have doubled their consumption rates almost every decade. The worlds natural resources have been on a steady decline for many years and a frequently asked question is “what’s next?”. Professor David MacKay explains how he thinks society can give answers to these questions of what is next after the natural resources dry up. MacKay is a professor of Natural Philosophy at the University of Cambridge, and chief Advisor of the U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change. MacKay has elaborated in several ways how countries around the world have increased consumption more in the past 15 years than ever before in recorded history. There are many factors that could effect the future of our energy crisis, including the increase of renewable power sources, slowing down on energy consumption, and the development of new technologies to power the forever growing world.

Our nation is on the brink of an energy crisis and alternative means to produce

The most of global energy production produces from fossil fuel such as coal, oil and natural gas. The vast fossil fuels generate energy which use for many purposes for instant residential, transportation and industrial sectors. While the rate consumption of fossil fuel higher than their formation leads to oil price crisis. Another concern of fossil fuel combustion is the impact on the environment. Global warming is a significant problem which results in increasing concentrations of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. These problems drive researchers and societies to search alternative energy such as switching to renewable energy or carbon-free energy to replace fossil fuels. For example Nakata et al., (2011:465) show ‘low-carbon society’

This article explains how all those countries are using energy. They are China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, and other. They will consume the global energy to almost double by 2040, according to the Department of Energy that released the news. However, people will save more resources that people would use in many other things? They are not recommending energy consumption. In order, they started using natural gas, and other renewable energy sources other than coal because it might cause pollution to the environment. It can also pollute the water and cause problems that might also make affect animal’s lives. Burning coal isn't a very bad idea but it should be used for a short period of time just to take care of people’s needs. Resulted, the EIA said CO2 has sent out from energy activities that are rising after years and will reach 43 billion metric tons in 2040, which can cause the air to pollute by burn wood, coal, and factories that might also use these resources instead of fossil fuels. Keeping an eye on when people start burning resources that cause CO2, and over many years now, CO2 is holding 34 percent. Which affects people’s and other living organisms around the world. As the studies show, An Administrator Adam Sieminski, said: “The world’s demand for fossil fuels will continue to grow.” Which means replacing fossil fuels with anything else, wouldn’t be favorable as fossil fuels. The purpose of this article is that natural resources are very important in around the world

People all around the world need to reduce the amount of carbon emissions that they release into the air. Plenty of the emissions are created by fossil fuels. According to Glenn Anderson, a member of the National Conference of State Legislatures, “Most C[O.sub.2] emissions come from the combustion of fossil fuel--for heating, electricity generation and transportation" (Anderson 20). The CO2 emissions not only come from cars, they also come from generators to produce electricity. Heating is also a big factor in the emissions. There are so many factories, such as NIPSCO, that will burn fuel in order to produce electricity for a city. While this company uses energy saving bulbs and equipment, they still burn fuels to create and produce the electricity. Scientists are continuing to understand more about climate change, finding alternative energy sources can be an important factor in reducing climate change. A book called Issues in Science and Technology states, "Scientific understanding of climate change has improved markedly, policy has advanced at the state level and internationally, and the portfolio of climate-friendly energy technologies that will be needed to maintain modern society has expanded" (Friedman 55). Many scientists are finding out more about climate change, and it is helping with the solution. A great quantity of them believe that the climate change can stop if people will start to use alternative energy sources.

Besides natural effects, growing presence of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is an inevitable concern to economists. The economic perspective on depletion of ozone layer and its side effects on the Mother-nature do not worry many nation officials who need development and money support. For some countries, necessary actions required for reduction of GHGs mean a major reduction in the variety of choices, consumption of products used and of costs of controlling the CO2. According to Andrew Hoffman, “to avoid the aforementioned scenarios, measures must be taken in all energy-consuming sectors of the economy: industry, transportation utilities and residential households. Homes, commercial buildings, and factories must become energy efficient, reducing their fuel use for heating, cooling, refrigeration, lighting, and so on. Improved energy efficiency is the primary near-term solution in each of these sectors; however, energy substitution is inevitable after initial cost-efficiency gains are made. The only efficient way to shift the use of other sources of energy is to raise the price of fossil fuels through a carbon tax …. 50% reduction in emission would require energy prices to more than double” .

From melting glaciers to devastating storms and stranded polar bears, the mascots of climate change show how rapidly the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) are changing the planet. Such examples, in addition with the rising price of energy, drive people to want to reduce consumption and lower their personal shares of global emissions. In the 1990s, almost every member state of the United Nations resolved to confront global warming and manage its consequences. Thus the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) international treaty recognized a unified resolve to curb global warming. In 1997, the Kyoto Protocol strengthened the convention. The process of cutting the carbon is a complex business and not all hybrid design would be a success in regard to uncertainties and political lobbying involved. The regulation of the government, participation of the industry and other participants can make the system effective over a certain time span.