Organizations expect the employees to believe in its mission, purpose and values and come out with the commitment by way of their deeds. This situation is called Employee Engagement. An employee who has total belief in the organization, has a desire to work to make things better and better in the business context, he is considered to be an Engaged Employee. They put forth an extra effort, as well as are very loyal towards their organization. They work there for long and show a strong level of commitment. Employee Engagement is a powerful source of competitive advantage. With this a research study was conducted among the employees of a reputed industrial organization at Hosur. A proper methodology was followed , tool administered, statistical test were done and findings were drawn.
The CIPD (2014) factsheet states that Employee Engagement is a concept that ‘is generally seen as an internal state of being – physical, mental and emotional – that brings together earlier concepts of work effort, organisational commitment, job satisfaction and ‘flow’ (or optimal experience)’. An engaged workforce willingly demonstrates discretionary effort within their roles; their goals and values reflect that of their employers/organisation; they express a passion for work, feel valued and that their work has meaning.
One of the primary factors in employee engagement is a person’s relationship with his or her direct manager. Some managers are excellent at managing teams and making each person feel valued, while others don’t have the same abilities. Train your managers in the skills that can improve employee engagement, and it can boost your organization’s overall results. Most employees fear their supervisors, so they choose to leave because they don’t want to work in a stressful environment. However, they don’t always express their
More importantly, these groups see their leaders as walking reflections of the organization’s core values (Dearborn, 2014). This increased productivity carries over to promote employee engagement. Dearborn asserted that engaged employees remain with organizations longer than those who are disengaged (Dearborn, 2014). Furthermore, disengaged employees cost the U.S. between $450 and $550 billion annually (Dearborn, 2014).
Employee Engagement: It’s a known perception that an engaged workforce provides many intangible benefits that is linked directly to retention. HR policies should focus on employee engagement initiatives that stimulate motivation levels of employees to perform better and bond with organisation. This process should be initiated right from induction and continue throughout their tenure by opening channels of continuous communication and encouraging interpersonal relations. HR is responsible to incorporate methods to measure engagement and at regular intervals track engagement contribution to company’s success.
Fifty-four percent of employees are not engaged. These employees have essentially “checked out,” sleepwalking through their workday and putting time – but not passion – into their work. (Dan Crim, 2006)
Employee engagement, which reflects the emotional commitment an employee has to an organization is not just an organizational nicety but a business necessity due to direct ties to a number of performance outcomes, such as profitability,
In internationally competitive business environments, employers need dedicated employees fully committed to the success of their organization (Kenan-Flagler, 2011). Although, there is a difference between employees who are engaged and those who are disengaged in terms of their commitment to the organization, motivation, enthusiasm and their focus on building a better future for their company. In these areas where engaged employees excel, disengaged employees fall short. These employees can have a negative effect on everything from customer service to sales, quality of products, productivity of the workers and other crucial areas of the business. The companies that invest their time in getting to know what matters to their employees are the
In studies, there is a correlation between a highly engaged workforce and the overall success of the company. Engaged work groups are 33% more profitable and 50% more productive (right.com 17). Common problems employers have is they carry the false assumption that employees are aware of the corporate goals of the company. This problem is easily overlooked in both management and employees as they are focused on the immediate tasks and are not aware how their actions contribute to the organization as a whole. This causes employees to not goals aligned with their organizations goals. Not having this understanding, employees become disengaged because they believe their work contributes to anything significant. When an organization’s goals are not understood, it becomes increasingly difficult to improve their performance (business salary). Keeping well performing employees is vital to the success of any company. It is also important to identify TWK’s employees do not work as a team. Instead, employees work for their individual goals. In TWK’s case, the goal for the majority of people at TWK is to retain their jobs, keeping themselves employed. An example of this separation
Employee engagement has been a trend of management since 2004.(CMI 2015) ‘Some people may believe that engagement is just about employees ‘going the extra mile’, but it is much more.’(CMI 2014) Within globalization, how to apply employee engagement is significant for an organization to achieve their performance. A key aspect of employee engagement concerns how employees manage their position, performance and development in relationship to the company’s strategies. Therefore, according to Moenguc (2013), employee engagement has been personalized as a“persistent, positive affective-motivational state of fulfillment.” To demonstrate how this process affects the overall performance of an organization, John Lewis has been selected as the case study
The monkeys at the top look down and see a tree full of smiling faces. The monkeys on the bottom look up and see nothing but assholes. The unknown author of this metaphor provides a descriptive analogy on the view of the executives who are at the top of the organizational chart which is completely opposite of the view that everyone else in the company sees. These different perspectives are just one of the reasons why employee engagement continues to be an important topic of research among consultants and company leaders. Engaged employees are defined as being committed to their organizations’ goals and values, motivated to contribute to organizational success, while enhancing their own sense of well-being. Even though engagement is a personal feeling, it still requires a combination of effort between the employee and the leaders of the organization. The bottom line is that organizations need highly engaged employees working in their companies because at the end of the day every employee’s productivity is affecting the bottom line of the company.
Employee engagement is a major issue for most of the organization even today, which needs to be resolved immediately. Employee engagement is fundamentally a
Quirke (2008) defined engaged employees as “feeling a strong emotional bond to their employer, recommending it to others and committing time and effort to help the organization succeed” (p. 102).