England's Demographic Changes During The Industrial Revolution

From around 1750 to 1900 Britain went through major changes or transformation in industry, agriculture and transportation that affected everybody’s lives. For some it generally improved their lives, however not all were so lucky. The industrial revolution brought with it many changes good for some and bad for others.

The lifestyle in France, just like in all other European countries, has changed dramatically since the early 1700’s. People went from farmers to factory owners to all of the professions of today’s society. The main reason for the great changes in lifestyle that occurred in France was the Industrial Revolution, which urbanized most of France. But the Industrial Revolution was not the only thing that changed France. The monarchy fell the church changed, and the role people had in their jobs and family life change drastically.

There is no doubt that the Industrial Revolution plays a central role in the modern British history. The structure of British society has forever changed by the impact and consequences of Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution is often stated as the increase of the number of factories, the exercise of steam power in a wide range of area and the mass-production produced by new technology in the course of 1750 to 1850 (Lane, 1978: 72). Engles (1986: 37) argued that the Industrial Revolution’s mainly development were the invention of the steam engine and the cotton industry. As the improvement of technology, the steam engine could produce more power with less

During the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries the European population grew immensely (Doc. 1). This was because there were lower death rates and more opportunities during this period. Also, one could also observe that the population increased the most in the countries that were being industrialized. Europe experienced tremendous population growth, but it was often decreased with plagues, wars, and famine. Food prices rose because there was a great need to feed the steadily increasing European population. This change fueled both the Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions. With more job opportunities, the European people took advantage of having multiple children because now they could provide more for their family. These fundamental

Hobsbawm defends the pessimistic view of England’s industrial revolution using the following arguments and evidence. He states that social indicators are more representative of individuals’ standard of living than wages (25-26). Thus, mortality rates strongly suggest a rise from 1811 to 1841, and although variances may be apparent among the available rates, these should not undermine their usefulness to measure the negative impacts that the industrial revolution may have had in England (26). Unemployment for artisans was widespread throughout various cities in 1842 (27). While wages might have been improving for artisans employment was not because of the growing nature of industrialization and the substantial number of workers unemployed during slower expansions and slumps, which, he states, emphasizes the importance to observe quantitative figures, not only qualitative ones (28). In regard to “foodstuffs”, the consumption per capita of tea, sugar, and tobacco remained quite consistent, except during and after evident slumps in which they fell and rose again (30). Furthermore, beef (shown by Smithfield figures, as well as excise on hides and leather) consumption did not rise in correspondence with the population increase, and wheat and milk consumption fell (31-32). He stresses that these assertions are merely to provide suspicion toward the view that the industrial revolution was a positive occurrence, but not to discredit the advances that it provided England, and eventually the Continent and the world, with overall

To begin with, the French production method that outdated towards other countries, predominantly turned into the root of the French Revolution. As in 1789, French economy laid on peasants and artisans (Soboul 1974, p. 27). At the same time, there were many developments of overseas trade and big industries in other parts of the world, especially Britain, which was France’s rival to achieve the authority in Europe. As a result, the French economic agents intended to transform their approach, as it happened in Britain. In fact, France just responsive to modernize in the transportation and communication section. It seemed less willing to change the

During the late 1840s, France had suffered commercial decline. France had begun construction on a large scale rail network, but failed to budget their construction properly, leaving the construction unfinished, and it’s backers bankrupt. This cascaded further than the initial investors, as smelters who relied on the railways to buy their metal lost a major purchaser. The resulting economic fallout lead to unemployment across several industries. The lack of work for the majority of the populace led many to poverty. At the time, bread prices began rising prices, further straining the economic situation of the working class.

marriage for women was younger than that in France, as well, they also had more children. A

Overcrowding in British cities was extreme during the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution for factories, and this led to the need of a labor force. These factors caused the level of population to grow, which caused large cities to develop very quickly, this was the main reason for overcrowding. The rapid population growth caused some serious problems in Britain. The demand for workers in factories caused people to leave small towns and farms to find employment in the cities. This changed Britain from an agriculture based to an urban focussed nation. The lack of adequate sanitation meant diseases spread quickly from poor conditions and unhygienic streets and work areas. The diseases killed many children and

Both the Industrial Revolution and the French Revolution induced great social transformations from the end of the 18th century on. The revolutions laid the foundation for the journey of modernization for Great Britain and France. Although the two countries were merely separated by the English Channel, the relatively low degree of pre-industrial international communications hindered the interaction of both events. Nevertheless, it is not coincidental that the revolutions occurred roughly at the same time: the rapidly increasing economic demand as well as the emergence of enlightenment philosophies served as the stimuli. However, the varied application and reaction to the two elements are country-based: the difference in the availability of natural resources, the class relations in each states, and the dissimilar applications of the philosophical ideas developed into the two distinctively varied revolutions.

There were many different factors which contributed to the rise and fall of population levels during the medieval and early modern period. No doubt one of the most catastrophically devastating limitations to the population on record in the medieval times was that of the Black Death in 1348 to 1350. However, famines were another common cause of population decline, and because of their impact on fertility, it could be argued that they were an even bigger check on population growth than mass deaths from disease in the same period. It is important to note that natural disasters and other limitations are

The period of agriculture in the industrial revolution saw a dramatic growth in the population of Great Britain , due to the improvement and introductions to new farming methods, which is said to be one part of the population growth. It is estimated that between the years 1300 and 1700 the population rapidly increased and decreased and that was because of the lack of food, and introductions to common diseases like the black death and the plague, which was a negative because many people were dying. Early eighteenth century the population doubled up , as cures were found and the agriculture was improved as changes in agriculture began to have an impact, more resources started to be available for food ,and larger populations could be fed. By

The French Revolution were influenced by many factors such as the Enlightenment ideals, concepts of popular sovereignty, and unchallengeable rights. France’s costly involvement in the Revolution and excessive spending by King Louis XVI and his predecessor had left the country on the brink of bankruptcy. Not only were the royal coffers exhausted, but two decades of poor cereal harvests, drought, cattle disease and skyrocketing bread prices had kindled unrest among peasants and the urban poor. (history.com).These actions played a critical role in shaping modern nations. As

There were plenty of signs that the Industrial Revolution propelled the world human population into an period of living and production at the final expense of the human condition. It also known to influence the resources that had been held for granted for the whole before history of human kind. There has always been plenty of resources before the demand for them. The human population increase is permanently connect together with growth use of natural and human made resources, energy, land for producing food and for living, and waste by products that they get rid of, to

Both the Industrial Revolution and the French Revolution left an everlasting print on society. Life in the 19th century changed drastically caused a shift in classes and the way in which society was seen, increased growth in wealth, and the beginning nations assuming national identities. The Industrial Revolution brought made the world confront numerous social results and economic changes that even now influence us today. The industrial revolution is known as one of the most important events in history; therefore, I agree is one of the most important factors in shaping European societies. Classes were shifting due to the effects of industrialisation. Working classes become more prosperous, and people taking more of an interest in the meaning