The Collapse Of Enron And The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

One major scandal revealed in 2001 was Enron, a major energy company located in Houston, Texas (Auerbach, 2010, pp. 6). This organization collapsed because of their deceptive accounting practices and mismanagement. In 2001, Enron fraudulent practices became a public scandal, and because of these practices, shareholders lost $74 billion and thousands of employees (pp. 2). Unfortunately, investors lost their retirement accounts and because they lost many employees, it left many people unemployed. Essentially, Enron kept huge debts off their balance sheets. There were so many businesses and investors that were linked to Enron, and its bankruptcy was a major movement in Congress to make a legislative initiative towards the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Enron had the largest bankruptcy in America’s history and it happened in less than a year because of scandals and manipulation Enron displayed with California’s energy supply. A few years ago, Enron was the world’s 7th largest corporation, valued at 70 billion dollars. At that time, Enron’s business model was full of energy and power. Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling had raised Enron to stand on a culture of greed, lies, and fraud, coupled with an unregulated accounting system, which caused Enron to go down. Lies were being told by top management to the government, its employees and investors. There was a rise in Enron 's share price because of pyramid scheme; their strategy consisted of claiming so much money to easily get away with their tricky ways. They deceived their investors so they could keep investing their money in the company.

Enron became a giant middleman that worked like a hybrid of traditional exchanges. But instead of simply bringing buyers and sellers together, Enron entered the contract with the seller and signed a contract with the buyer, making money on the

The word “fraud” was magnified in the business world around the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002. No one had seen anything like it. Enron, one of the country’s largest energy companies, went bankrupt and took down with it Arthur Andersen, one of the five largest audit and accounting firms in the world. Enron was followed by other accounting scandals such as WorldCom, Tyco, Freddie Mac, and HealthSouth, yet Enron will always be remembered as one of the worst corporate accounting scandals of all time. Enron’s collapse was brought upon by the greed of its corporate hierarchy and how it preyed upon its faithful stockholders and employees who invested so much of their time and money into the company. Enron seemed to portray that the goal of corporate America was to drive up stock prices and get to the peak of the financial mountain by any means necessary. The “Conspiracy of Fools” is a tale of power, crony capitalism, and company greed that lead Enron down the dark road of corporate America.

Others companies like WorldCom provided the extra fuel that mandated that the United States Congress enact wide sweeping litigation to mitigate against large dollar level fraud, Ponzi schemes, accounting manipulation and unethical behavior among publicly traded companies. These events prompted the formation of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002. Not since the 1920’s have Americans seen such mismanagement of funds, corporate greed, and corruption. With the establishment of the Securities Act of 1933 and 1934 the US was able to initiate the first attempt at trying to control the issue of unethical behavior and corporate fraud. According to Rockness, H., & Rockness, J. (2005) "Losses from financial frauds total approximately $200 billion dollars. On Enron alone those losses are more than two times the aggregate losses suffered when the stock market crashed in 1929." (Rockness, H., & Rockness, J. 2005) Enron changed the game and

In the early 1990s, a young company named Enron was quickly moving up Fortune magazine’s chart of “America’s Most Innovative Company.” As the corporate world began to herald Enron as the next global leader in business, a dark secret loomed on the horizon of this great energy company. Aggressive entrepreneurs eager to push the company’s stock price higher and a series of fraudulent accounting procedures involving special purpose entities were about to be exposed. In early 2002, the United States Justice Department announced its intent to pursue a criminal investigation into the once mighty company, Enron.

An economic boom filled with fraud, collapsed in the early 2000s with the unravelling of Enron in October 2001 followed by the implosion of WorldCom and many others big corporations. The downfall of these major companies led to a wide spread crisis of confidence in the financial markets. A crisis caused by executive greed was able to be magnified when the gatekeepers, the auditors, lawyers and analysts, responsible for keeping businesses in check, also fell to greed.

The collapse of Enron left thousands of employees without jobs and demolished the retirement accounts of employees and investors alike. Enron, a company much like General Electric (GE) was ranked as one of the top ten on the Fortune 500 list in 2001 (according to Fortune 500 archive list) right before Enron filed for bankruptcy in October of that year. According to an article by (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-01-27/news/0201270343_1_enron-stock-market-cautious-investors) Flynn McRobertshe, “At one time the seventh-largest company in the country, Enron was a popular pick for many investors--both individuals and large institutions such as pension and mutual funds.” No one expected a company of that size to be able collapse and conduct business like Enron did. To many it was hard to believe

Enron’s fraudulent financial practices lead to the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Mistakes made by the company and their leadership shocked the world and cost billions. Enron’s leadership could have taken steps to prevent or mitigate the repercussions of their actions. The act restored ethical and reliable financial practices to the market.The major provisions of the act made corporations responsibility for financial reports, and required internal and external audits. The Act changed the accounting regulatory environment. And although corporations incurred the additional expense of audit and new reporting standards, these changes restored consumer investing confidence, strengthening the corporations and the stock market overall. (Flanigan, 2002.)

Enron’s ride is quite a phenomenon: from a regional gas pipeline trader to the largest energy trader in the world, and then back down the hill into bankruptcy and disgrace. As a matter of fact, it took Enron 16 years to go from about $10 billion of assets to $65 billion of assets, and 24 days to go bankruptcy. Enron is also one of the most celebrated business ethics cases in the century. There are so many things that went wrong within the organization, from all personal (prescriptive and psychological approaches), managerial (group norms, reward system, etc.), and organizational (world-class culture) perspectives. This paper will focus on the business ethics issues at Enron that were raised from the documentation Enron: The Smartest Guys

Besides hiding results, they also created affiliated companies (SPEs - special purpose entities) to transfer liabilities and expenses camouflage. On balance, not consolidated Enron statements together with the related companies SPE`s. They used improperly accounting technique mark-to-market. The main reasons for the financial and accounting transactions Enron seemed to increase revenue and cash flow reported at a high level, the amount of inflated assets and liabilities off the company's accounts. The combination of all these factors eventually lead to giant bankrupt.

Enron Corporation was an energy company founded in Omaha, Nebraska. The corporation chose Houston, Texas to home its headquarters and staffed about 20,000 people. It was one of the largest natural gas and electricity providers in the United States, and even the world. In the 1990’s, Enron was widely considered a highly innovative, financially booming company, with shares trading at about $90 at their highest points. Little did the public know, the success of the company was a gigantic lie, and possibly the largest example of white-collar crime in the history of business.

As competition increased and the economy started to plunge in the early 2000s, Enron struggled to maintain their profit margins. Executives determined that in order to keep their debt ratio low, they would need to transfer debt from their balance sheet. “Reducing hard assets while earning increasing paper profits served to increase Enron’s return on assets (ROA) and reduce its debt-to-total-assets ratio, making the company more attractive to credit rating agencies and investors” (Thomas, 2002). Executives developed Structured Financing and Special Purpose Entities (SPE), which they used to transfer the majority of Enron’s debt to the SPEs. Enron also failed to appropriately disclose information regarding the related party transactions in the notes to the financial statements.Andersen performed audit work for Enron and rendered an unqualified opinion of their financial statements while this activity occurred. The seriousness and amount of misstatement has led some to believe that Andersen must have known what was going on inside Enron, but decided to overlook it. Assets and equities were overstated by over $1.2 billion, which can clearly be considered a material amount (Cunningham & Harris, 2006). These are a few of several practices that spiraled out of control in an effort to meet forecasted quarterly earnings. As competition grew against the energy giant and their

When Enron's stock price subsequently fell, the SPE's value also fell, triggering the Enron guarantees, which guarantee payments in turn apparently further reduced Enron stock value, triggering additional guarantees.

Most of the world has heard of Enron, the American, mega-energy company that “cooked their books” ( ) and cost their investors billions of dollars in lost earnings and retirement funds. While much of the controversy surrounding the Enron scandal focused on the losses of investors, unethical practices of executives and questionable accounting tactics, there were many others within close proximity to the turmoil. It begs the question- who was really at fault and what has been done to prevent it from happening again?