Enterprise Resources Planning Implementation Of Manufacturing And Public Sector

Kumar, P. (2010). Successful implementation of ERP in a large organization International journal of engineering science and technology. Vol. 2(7), 3218-3224. Retrieved from http://www.ijest.info/docs/IJEST10-02-07-151.pdf

The problem presented by Joseph-Armand Bombardier is the upcoming third round of ERP implementation in his organization. Even though a big improvement over the efficiency and success of execution between the first ERP round (Mirabel plant) and second round (Saint-Laurent plant), there is still room for improvement.

An extensive research was done to fetch the historical background of company, the functioning of its legacy systems, and the issues that are being faced by the company as a result of ERP implementation. However, there are only few studies that showed ERP case studies for the company relative to the ERP issues.The web searches provided a restricted account of data on company’s ERP profile. In order to find details of the issues that are being faced by the

In general, ERP systems are designed to standardize information entry and create data storage for information sharing across the organization. There are numerous advantages of ERP but skeptics argued on the fact that these advantages can be also achieved by simplification and lean production methods. IT systems could be effective and reliable in the long run but at the same time there is an uncertainty about whether it will align with the concerned business process. For instance, the ERP system implemented at the Korey plant to replace MRP system failed. Though it met the requirements of individual unit and enabled employees with wide range of

To increase the chance of a successful ERP implementation and to minimize organizational resistance, Hunter Manufacturing should be careful in “selecting the right employees to participate in the implementation process (Bingi, P.; et al.).” Employees and managers with the right attitude can make the implementation an easier transition by increasing employee buy in through education, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence.

The Problem. ERP packages are difficult to install because they are so large in scope. The top reasons why ERP installations fail are (1) unrealistic expectations, (2) inability to map business processes, (3) inaccurate data, and (4) failure to factor in hidden costs. The implementation of an ERP system can take up to 24 months, depending on the number of modules that are implemented. Project management activities are extremely complex with multiple layers of resource concerns. Change management processes are extremely important in ERP systems development and implementation, yet this is often overlooked by many organizations. Postimplementation issues that are of concern include the quality of training manuals, hands-on training provided, help-desk and user navigation, and productivity using the new system. The Solution. Two factors were found to

An effective communication has been suggested to be one of the success factors that have an impact on users’ acceptance of an ERP implementation (Amoako-Gyampah & Salam, 2004). Furthermore Ngai et al. (2008) rightfully pointed out that communication is vital for an organisation to achieve an advantage from the ERP system implementation. In order to overcome user resistance before and during the implementation of ERP, operative and explicitly communication is very important in all

Anderson (2014) said “ERP implementations rarely fail in formulation; however, they frequently fail in implementation.” It does not in with just purchasing an ERP system. A well designed implementation plan is the company’s ticket to success. A well designed implementation plan addresses all potential bottlenecks like execution problems such as lack of training, attitude and participation of the entire workforce from leaders to staff, and member selection for the whole ERP project implementation team. An ERP project is

In light of their wide extent of use inside a business, ERP programming systems are commonly unpredictable and for the most part force noteworthy changes on staff work hones. Implementing ERP programming is normally not an "in-house" expertise, so significantly littler projects are more financially savvy if authority ERP implementation specialists are utilized. The period of time to implement an ERP system relies on upon the span of the business, the extent of the change and readiness of the client to take proprietorship for the project. A little project (e.g., a company of under 100 staff) might be arranged and conveyed inside 3 months; nonetheless, an extensive, multi-site or multi-nation implementation may take years.

The main barriers for implementing ERP systems in SMEs were constraints in terms of resources and information, implementation time escalations, poorly defined organisational structures, weak formalisation of procedures or processes, unclear and also confused understanding amongst the employees and management.

ERP implementation is a massive decision making process for the company with a lot of risk which involves significant after affect for the company in future prospective of the organization in relation with performance, maintenance and growth. There are a no of potential risks involved that should be avoided while installing of ERP systems, but the first step to avoid is by deciding as which type of ERP package the organization needs as there are a lots of different vendors selling different ERP packages and company needs to select the best for itself. ERP system selection is tedious and time consuming. However, given the considerable financial investment and potential risks and benefits which would be involved, the importance of a pertinent ERP system selection cannot be overemphasized (teltumbde,2000). Since business is characterized by high rate of uncertainty, risks, and evolution the process of ERP systems implementation involves numerous problems. “Kumar et al. (2000)” emphasized that installing an ERP system is much more than having another information technology tool; it a

Some businesses are apprehensive about the time and costs involved in implementing an ERP system. That’s understandable, as traditional ERP software can be inflexible and take a significant amount of resources to implement.

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is a business management system that comprises set of rules and regulation, which should be used, for the successful

When Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solutions and systems came in early 90ies, they were considered too expensive and complex for smaller organizations and were mainly considered by the largest organizations. However, vendors like SAP have started to redirect the system towards SMEs also and cheaper and inexpensive versions are rolled from them that are making Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)s very popular among SMEs also (Everdinen et al., 2000).

ERP implementation is unlikely experience that any company will have. It has to be planned prepared and stimulated from the entire stakeholder otherwise it will sunk the millions of dollar and it drain the companies market. In case of Nestle USA, it confronted a lot of difficulties due to improper implementation plan yet be able to recover as a successful project. Many organisations have gone through the similar situation that there are plenty of lesson to be learned. We can conclude that ERP implementation needs big consideration on business requirement, business process reengineering, stakeholder’s involvement, hardware and software and other units.