Episcopalianism Vs Presbyterianism

The split difference between people could be a single belief. This is one reason why there are so many types of Christianity. They all believe in a God and a way of life which is usually God, Jesus, and or the Holy Spirit and the ways of the bible. It could all be a matter of how to achieve salvation. Pentecostals and Episcopalians are extremely different. Baptists are more of a mutual faith between the two. What sets most religions apart is who they give their thanks and praise to.

While the majority of Americans (almost 80%) identify themselves as Christians, religion in the United States is characterized by both a large diversity of believers and variable attendance and adherence levels (Eck, 2002). However, an August 2010 poll showed that almost 70% of Americans believed that religion was losing influence in everyday life, yet most feel that is a negative thing even though politicians continue to discuss religion while campaigning (Religion Losing, 2012). In light of these statistics, many religious scholars have turned to more quantitative methods to establish ways to both improve service attendance, solidify the financial health of churches, and establish a faith-based understanding of current psychographic trends. One of the predominant ways this is happening is through people like George Barna.

127). This point is the first of emphasized three that seems worthy of its own chapter. While still maintaining that Americans are not polarized, Fiorina et al. give concessions to the opposition, recognizing their own speculation (p. 133). In addition to this, the authors included an appendix immediately after the chapter to clarify their charts. Although slightly different, this is reminiscent of the early chapters. The authors have rediscovered their confidence that had faltered in the two previous arguments. No longer relying on misrepresentations to paint a prettier picture, the authors instead trust in themselves enough to admit supposition and then defend it. Before getting into that, the authors begin by explaining that many scholars have identified a correlation between religion and voter identification (p. 128). What Fiorina et al. argue is that specific religions are not an indicator of specific political identification. Instead, they claim that it is the commitment of an individual to their religion, regardless of denomination, is the determining factor. This important distinction provides the authors with a base on which to build their

Furthermore, emphasizing the influence of President’s secret religiosity on the politics of the country may well be part of a larger regard to view religion as, entirely, a private task, rather than a common enterprise. However, civil religion in U.S Presidential rhetoric still represents the republican tradition of the Declaration of Independence, and it is important in shaping the policy and political rhetoric guide of the Americans in choosing their candidates. It also attributes to the American sense of exceptionalism which is the belief that the United States is chosen by God. This idea was emphasized in one of the preacher Billy Graham’s sermons, who argued that, the desire of September 9/11 would come to be seen as ‘a day of victory’,

Bush had with Christians, Obama partook in religiously focused events in hopes of structuring an evangelical backing as well as quieting down his supposed Muslim faith. In the face of creating an advisory council specifically to reach Catholic voters and citing the Bible at different events, Patricia Smith in “Religion & the White House” claims that “18 percent of Americans still believe he’s a Muslim, according to a 2010 Pew Research Center Poll.” An individual can only go so far to convince an assemblage of people of a particular lifestyle before it simply becomes ignorance. In the 2012 presidential race, it was Barack Obama’s competition that was at the forefront of the religious

Yet, it is only the appearance of religion that is helpful . George Bush claims that not only is he saved, but is called upon by God to political office. He also uses extensive references to scripture during his public speeches and he promises to bring freedom “as a gift from the Almighty” to benighted regions of the world like the Middle East. His so called strong morality and grounding in faith was one of the major reasons for his widespread public appeal, and according to some estimates, they are among the most important factors in the 2004 election(Urban, #130). This “good ole boy” painted a virtuous image of himself that the people loved and he has quickly fallen from grace after being in office for two terms. His positive popularity diminished, not only in the United States, but all over the world as well. I found the following fact interesting: a poll conducted in Britain named Bush the second biggest “threat to world peace” after Bin Laden, beating North Korean president Kim Jong–il (Wikipedia, #203). I guess appearance isn’t everything.

I don’t think religion has any place in politics, and certainly should not play any important role in government or politics. But America’s conservatives are obsessed with religion, with these GOP candidates perpetually attempting to “out-Christian” each other. It’s quite common to hear conservatives rant about Obama not being “Christian enough” for their liking. Why, then, are they all clamoring to get Trump elected? Trump has been divorced twice and married three times, and recently made some controversial remarks about his Church visits.

Religion, whether we realize it or not, is a major element of American society (and also worldwide history). For many, religion is a significant part of their cultural identity. Religion plays a part in all levels of politics and is often an aspect of community events and organizations. Everyday, we all interact with people who have different religious backgrounds and personal beliefs. Children born into religious families are very connected with their religions from birth and this affects the way they will see the world for the rest of their lives. Even those who later explore other faiths or convert to other religious ideas will be affected in

“Blue laws” are laws that prohibit certain activates on Sundays. During the 19th century, blue laws continued as activist were successful in enacting and enforcing new laws preventing many commercial or “immoral” activities on a Sunday. These laws were opposed Catholic immigrants from Europe, members of the Jewish faith and political progressives who viewed practices as violation of church and state. The United States Supreme court rules that restricting activities on Sundays are not unconstitutional if there is “a secular purpose in enacting

“American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us,” by Robert D. Putnam and David E. Campbell, and “America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity,” by Robert Wuthnow, give different thoughts to religion and politics in the United States. Putnam and Campbell utilize the concepts of shocks and aftershocks to highlight religious changes in the United States. On the other hand, Wuthnow uses observations to focus on the encounters of religious diversity in the United States. Wuthnow compares American Christianity with other popular religions in America and how Christianity has affected the perception of religion. Putnam and Campbell’s “American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us” is a more persuasive assessment of American religion and politics.

America wastes a lot of time trying to create a democracy completely absent of the moral expectations that our ancestors have put into place. Our founding fathers’ dream of establishing a country in which all people would be accepted has begun to fall. In our attempt to rid our country of a democracy contaminated with any belief in a supreme power, we have rid ourselves of many of our values and morals. Perhaps it is impossible for religion to dominate our political country, but we have misinterpreted the original intent of “separation of church and state” and taken this concept too far.

Out of these 44 individuals, 43 have been white and all of them have been men. There has been only one black president and there has never been a female president. The United States constitution prohibits a religious test as a requirement for the presidency, however, nearly all of the U.S. presidents have been christians (Masci 2017). Nearly half of the presidents have been affiliated with the Episcopal or Presbyterian churches. John F. Kennedy has been the only Catholic to have held the nation’s highest office. Only three U.S. presidents — Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson — have been unaffiliated with a specific religious tradition (Knott 2005). A survey by the Pew Research Center shows that many Americans care about their beliefs. For instance, half of all American adults say it’s important for a president to share their religious beliefs. And more people now say there is “too little” religious discussion by their political leaders (40%) than say there is “too much” (27%). Two of possibly the most famous presidents in American history had no formal religious affiliation. The first, Thomas Jefferson, lost his faith in orthodox Christianity at an early age, but continued to believe in

For social scientists, it will be interesting to study and analyze how organized religions will attempt to gain back their power to influence and to stay relevant in the political process as well as staying in individuals’ routines. The change in perception of the public on the perceived relationship between the church and state can cause major change in how government officials are elected and whether these official will continue to turn to their religious beliefs when deciding policy. Again, France is an example of how religion has been taken out the political process which discourages officials from referring or mentioning their faith in public discourses and speeches. The change in representation in government can be affected by secularism especially in the United States where a large number of officials claim taking part in a certain religion. In Congress, about 90% of members claim to be Christian and only 1 member claims to be unaffiliated with any religion. With an incoming generation that is not religious-oriented or wishes not to have religion in government, it can transform the scale the extent in which religion and culture can have on social and political progress. Communities could no longer rely on religious beliefs or social norms on their own modifying individual behavior and political choices in order to be

In the body of political science research, there is a world of information about how female candidates running for office affect the likelihood of women to be politically active. There is also a significant amount of data regarding both candidate religion and religiosity and how these factors could impact their likeability and send subtle messages to voters. However, there is not enough research that has been done on the intersection of these two topics. In this literature review, I will attempt to connect these topics, specifically to predict how religious women would tend to vote for highly visible religious female candidates. Primarily, I will address how candidate gender

Religion influences many of the leaders from around the world. Many politicians use religion such as Christianity as a way of appealing to the masses and to get followers for their campaigns. In the United States the republican party is known and considered to be the Christian party. They have ideals such as pro-life and tend to be a bit more conservative than Democrats. However, Christianity’s involvement in politics had started at the “turn of the century, known as the Second Enlightenment…’which’…launched movements like the Disciples of Christ, a community in which three future presidents were brought up--- James Garfield, Lyndon Johnson, and Ronald Reagan.”