Ernesto Che Guevara Research Paper

Mao Zedong was born in the Shaoshan village in the Hunan Province of China in 1893. Born to a peasant farmer who independently became wealthy, Mao became a revolutionary whose theoretical ideas spurred him into taking action against imperialist China. His father was noted to be a very strict man who wanted Mao to follow in his footsteps on the farm. Mao, however, was rebellious and had other ideas that he wished to pursue. He was a lover of books and learning the ways of many theoretical writers. One of his favorites for which he would eventually style his own beliefs and actions after is Karl Marx. These would come to be known as Maoism.

Methods: This investigation will describe Che Guevara’s involvement in Latin American independence movements, focusing specifically on his involvement with Fidel Castro’s “26th of July” movement. His actions and words will be analyzed, and his conduct this period of political upheaval will be used as evidence in order to answer the investigative question.

Alternatively, Chavez was born in Yuma, in the state of California. Likewise, Chavez moved to California with his parents to work in the fields. As Chavez, experienced the disturbing conditions that he and his fellow farm pickers encountered, he knew that he will soon devote his life in changing, the horrible migrant camps, untrustworthy labor contractors, bitter racism and insufficient wages.

Simon Bolivar, who had a reputation of being a liberator, took center stage. The common folk began to trust his words, as he talked about fighting for the resources that were theirs, ideals taken directly from the American Revolution itself. Also with the power struggle created by the Napoleonic wars, uprisings began. The most prominent of this movement was the uprising in Chuquisaca in 1809, which led to the formation of the Government Juntas. This group focused on taking the power from the Spanish and giving it to the people. Seeing the movement in Bolivia take shape, Latin Nations such as Peru began to provide military support to Bolivian liberators. Surprisingly, America didn’t live up to its reputation, having no negative impact on this revolution. Normally, America had been notorious for backing up the dictators or colonial powers and suppressing the Latin liberators. All in all, the combination of a power struggle brought upon by foreign wars, introduction of revolutionary independence ideals, proper leadership, and foreign aid, the Bolivian revolution was successful in liberating the nation from Spanish Colonial power after 16 years of conflict.

This paper will analyze whether Pablo Escobar was a Modern day Robin Hood or a Murderous Tyrant. Escobar to this day is still a highly controversial character and is perceived differently throughout Columbia. The topic was undertaken by thorough research and analyzing documents and interviews. Due to lack of Primary Documents, the majority of my research was from secondary sources. Pablo Escobar grew up in a time period which was referred to simply as the Violencia, Pablo was known as a loving father and the people saw him as a local boy who had done well for himself and gave back millions to the community. Escobar was not always seen as a charitable figure he was targeted by extreme left winged guerrillas. Intimidation and violence were the

In attempt to push Cuban nationalist Fidel Castro out of power, in April of 1961 the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) launched full-scale invasion of the Bahía de Cochinos in Cuba that was unfortunately not a success and failed miserably within 24 hours. After two years of trying to remove Castro from his political position America was very optimistic about this final strike. However, between being outnumbered by Castro's troops and almost immediately surrendering the invasion was not effective.

Planning each aspect of the Revolution, he compiled shipments of arms without the knowledge of neither the United States nor Cuban governments. He placed his heart and soul into the organization and preparations of the Revolution without complaint. As the Revolution dawned, he fought with dignity and purpose, serving his followers well into the revolution even after death.

The big question that has everyone stuck is was Che Guevara a hero or a villain. Che Guevara was a marxist revolutionary, which is a practice of communism which is not a good thing. Communism leads to dictatorship because you want everyone to share wealthiness, so everyone is equal, no one is being paid more no one is being paid less than anyone else. People can have less money than they had before but everyone is still equal. The bad part is some people are working harder than other people but they still get paid the same, also the people who do what the dictator says can get paid more money from the leader which means they might as well go back to where they started because the leader and the people who does what the leader says have more

Cuba has been around since October 10 1868. Cuba gained full independence in 1902. Cuba has been a communist country for over fifty years. Fidel Castro has been in power for roughly 5 decades. The United States was given the right to get involved with Cuban occurrences in 1902. US and Cuba have had political wars, nuclear disasters, and budgetary restraint. The US and Cuba have been at a standstill since the end of the Cold War but things have become more ordinary since 2015.

Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and Raul Castro have some things in common. One of those things are ; that they both are Latin American leaders . Later on you will learn about their life and how they became leaders. You will also learn about the differences and the things they have in common . Another thing that you will learn is about their impact on their own country and how they changed the country into what it is today . I will first speak about Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and after her I will speak about Raul Castro.

Ernesto “Che” Guevara was a part of the 26th of July Movement in Cuba. He became a revolutionary leader who inspired many and brought the guerrilla to victory in 1959. He was a part of the eighty-two men who sailed on the Granma from Mexico to Cuba in December of 1956 (Staten 114). The biographical film, Che: Part One directed by Steven Soderbergh, shows the journey of Che and the guerrillas as they attempted to defeat Batista’s military. Che: Part One is not simply just a depiction of Che’s life, but it brings you right into the action of the armed struggle the guerrilla faced. The revolution shaped Che into the leader he became. He started out as a simple doctor who wanted to bring the people of Cuba what they deserved. Che went through changes as the periods of the revolution went on. He grew to be a leader that would bring his people to the victories they achieved. Throughout the portrayal of the revolution, it can be seen how Che changes and adapts based on what situation he is facing and how the movie shows it. The film goes back and forth between the times Che is in Cuba fighting and after he wins the revolution and talks about his experiences.

As a child the young Guevara “developed a persistent cough and later serious allergic asthma” (“CUBA: Castro’s Brain”) prompting his family of seven to “move to the hill town of Alta Gracia” (“CUBA: Castro’s Brain”) a city 250 miles northwest of Rosario. During these youthful years, “his father … started [Ernesto] rambling through some of the 3,000 books, mostly leftist sociology and history, that crammed the family bookshelves” (“CUBA: Castro’s Brain”) among which were “the works of Chile’s Communist Poet Pablo Neruda” (“CUBA: Castro’s Brain”) which compelled the young boy greatly to further explore leftist ideologies. Neruda’s poetry, which had a great influence on the young boy by presenting the great struggles of the Latin American peoples, was characterized by its stark depiction of human suffering as seen in his poem “United Fruit Co.:” “… in the seaports’ / sugary abysses, / Indians collapsed, buried / in the morning mist: / a body rolls down, a nameless / thing, a fallen number, / a bunch of lifeless fruit / dumped in the rubbish heap” (Neruda 45). Along with the political writings of Karl Marx, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Vladimir Lenin – all socialist thinkers and leaders in their own like – the young Guevara entered politics at the age of 14 “as a member of a nationalistic youth group specializing in

I decided to write this research paper because we were assigned to find an issue or subject within Latin America to write about. One of the most widely known and influential revolutionary figure in the history of Latin America is Ché Guevara. Ché knew how to use his intelligence and judgment in all the circumstances he encountered taking advantage of each moment as if it was a highly intensive chess game he was sincerely

Like the much used stencil of Guevara's determined visage, the general perception of his life is flat and two-dimensional. No where more so, it seems, then in the country richest in Guevara's history, Cuba. An article printed July 21st 1997 in Newsweek, entitled 'Return Of The Rebel', explored Cuban society in the wake of the long-awaited discovery of Guevara's skeleton in Bolivian town of Vallegrande. In it journalist Brook Lamer explains how 'the Cuban Government played a pivotal role in creating the Che mystique, and it is not about to let its franchise slip away'[2].

It is hard to travel anywhere in the world without seeing somewhere the iconic image of Che Guevara on a T-Shirt, souvenir, or poster. The original photographer, and the Irish artist who turned that photograph into a print, are virtually unknown. However, their image has been redistributed to the point where it can effectively be called an icon or a meme. There is no small amount of irony in the fact that an icon of communism has become an emblem of capitalism: as the image has been bought and sold countless times in countless countries around the world. The iconic image of Che Guevara has a hipster chic to it, but also political panache. To don the Che Guevara image means one does not agree with the establishment and is part of the 99%. However, Che Guevara is a controversial figure too. The image has been banned in some parts of the world, because Che was a radical revolutionary who was not against the use of armed uprisings in communist revolts. Therefore, the iconic Che Guevara image created first in Cuba and turned into pop art by an Irishman is a paradoxical and typically postmodern cultural meme.