Essay Against 10 % Plan

The benefits of this will be less student debt, higher student populations, and more jobs will be available.

       Recently President Obama proposed a plan to make two years of community college free to

On the other hand, US citizens from other states cannot pay in-state tuition rates, so that is unfair to them. A way to solve this issue perhaps would be to create a public policy to allow US students to pay the same tuition rate across the US. In total, alternative 1 scores 2.05 out of 3.0. The policy is of low cost to the state, brings in a large amount of revenue, and is relatively fair to the parties involved and affected.

In 1997, Texas legislature passed a law that all high school seniors were to be accepted to the University of Texas if they finish in the top ten percent of their class. The University of Texas followed this law but found that their student body was becoming less and diverse. Universities believe that having a diverse student is an important part of learning.

Kayla Webley states concerns around Applebaum’s plan which involves fairness. One question Webley brings to my attention is, why should taxpayers especially those who never attended college in the first place cover the cost of the borrowers education (3). On one hand Webley brings up a valid point. Why should taxpayers pay for a college tuition for someone who possibly never held a job or for that matter ever paid taxes. On the other hand though if the taxpayers vote to

It is unfair to those who pay their taxes see no good come from it. Although, it is their civic duty, they should be able to be proud and say “I’m glad my tax dollars went to that program.”

Education should not be denied because of financial reasons. Children shouldn’t be denied an education because of their “wealth status”; they should be guaranteed an equal, fair education.

The few people who stated their supportive thoughts on this matter were encouraging about wanting free tuition for community colleges. "I think any time access to education is increased, it is a positive step forward in economic vitality, Stanley said.” (Obama 's free community college tuition plan raises doubts). I agree with what Stanley stated when we take the initiative to realize there is a problem in our education system with furthering our education it’s a good leap forward to more people getting the right education needed to get better jobs and provide for their families. Even David Patti who is president and CEO of Pennsylvania business council also suggested cost of tuition wouldn’t need to be very high in cost if companies donated equipment and computers necessary to the schools. Laura Fisher who is senior vice president with Allegheny business council stated a good example such as there are

Community college should not be free An article written by Joanne Jacobs gives two perspectives about President Barack Obama’s free college plan. The reason behind Obama’s unveiling is because he believes if he makes community college free the number of people with degrees with increase. Yet not a lot of people agree. If community college does become free then a lot of more students would like to go that route since they won’t be paying debts or loans till they transfer into a university.

I feel this essay has an unbiased tone; however, I don’t see a varied perspective. Possibly the naysayer could the group of people that set the tuition defending their reasoning as to why it is so

Eliminating the cost of tuition would tremendously help students get a head start on their college education. Sara Goldrick-Rab

There are several problems with this arrangement not the least of which: It smacks of indentured servitude. The arrangement puts the student in the same financial place as traded securities: i.e. bought and sold. In addition, investing in an individual student would be on its face a more risky “investment” if the student were from low-income families. This plan might work for student from high-income families: Students from high-income families can use their family income, and assets as tangible collaterals; and goodwill, namely, family name and reputation as intangible “collaterals.” So in institutions of higher learning, the poor would be underrepresented in the student population if the Marco Rubio model is deployed.

Arthur C. Brooks presents his opinion on an idea gaining prevalence across the United States in his published article, “My Valuable, Cheap College Degree.” This new idea is a college degree which costs the student a total of $10,000, also known as the 10K-B.A. Inspired by a challenge to educators from Bill Gates, governors in the states of Texas, Florida, Wisconsin, and a state assemblyman in California have recently made efforts to make this idea a reality.

Higher education should, without a doubt, be free and available for all. Imagine if you were a high school student with good grades and you weren’t able to go to college because of the high expenses; how would you feel? The costs have just gotten out of hand for students. Some kids have had no other choice but to enter the work field making little money. When this happens, people are unable to support themselves and are living paycheck-to-paycheck. To avoid situations like poverty,

Before debating on whether increasing tuition fee is unfair to future students, we should keep in mind that the current education system and policy can never benefit everyone. Especially when the competition between universities is a lot more intense nowadays. Increasing the income and value of the school is the priority. If one has no money or resources provided, it is less likely that he or she can be enrolled at a university compared to others. Thus, the