Essay

what he perceived to be his father’s moral shortcomings, the hypocrisy of his parents’ lifestyle,

parents were willing to give him.This attitude came forth when he found out about his father’s

Never before a united nation, smaller independent German states were not united until the 1860s after a series of wars engineered by Otto von Bismarck. Historian, Eric Hobsbaw, says this of Bismarck, "He remained the undisputed world champion at the game of multilateral diplomatic chess for almost twenty years after 1871, [and] devoted himself exclusively, and successfully, to maintaining peace between the powers." Studying the German assimilation processes, Luebke focuses on sociohistorical interpretations of their religious leaders, theology and institutional changes, i.e. the Lutheran Church in particular. But preservation of the German language, transmittal of cultural heritage and moral idealism are the approach Henry J. Schmidt takes in studying German-Americanism in his essay The Rhetoric of Survival: The Germanist in America from 1900 to

him to go fish with a successful boat. The boy obeyed his father, but he still tried to take

Peter Fritzche’s book, Germans into Nazis, contends that, “Germans became Nazis because they wanted to become Nazis and because the Nazis spoke so well to their interests and inclinations…however, voters did not back Hitler mainly because they share his hatred of the Jews…but because they departed from established political traditions in that they were identified at once with a distinctly popular form of ethnic nationalism and with the basic social reforms most Germans counted on to ensure national well-being.” (8-9) His argument rests on the notion that the Nazis had a vision for Germany that incorporated Germans into a national community, throwing off the restraints of a tired government, and propelled them towards a future that would

Nationalism was an essential and indispensable variable in the ruin of the Weimar Republic and thusly, the resulting disappointment of vote based system in Germany in the period 1918-1934. The feeling of dependability and commitment to one 's country, which the German subjects had felt in their aggressive past, was at last crushed by WWI and its outcomes. In spite of the fact that patriotism was a noteworthy reason for the disappointment of vote based system in Germany, there were numerous different components adding to the anxiety upon the nation 's administration right now. This incorporated the Treaty of Versailles, the Reparations Bill, the control of the Ruhr and hyperinflation. A few endeavors to introduce nationalistic convictions back in the legislature happened, the most vital of these being the Kapp Putsch by the conservative patriots and the 'Lager Hall ' Putsch by the conservative Nazi party. The thwarted expectation felt by the general population and their need to restore pride in their country impacted numerous elements that prompted the disappointment of vote based system, and to the ascent of the Nazi political gathering and its pioneer Adolf Hitler.

In order to capture Tuchman’s argument on Germany’s behavior, it is essential to understand that realism asserts that all states seek power and that anarchy dictates the laws of the international system. Despite the internal divisions between classical and structural realism on how anarchy leads to war, this paradigm emphasizes the enduring propensity for conflict between self-interested states due to the lack of a central authority to regulate or control nation states. States are concerned with the distribution of power and seek to ensure their own survival and security in the international system. From a realist perspective, the outbreak of the war was a result of the increasingly multi-polar nature of arrangements and the entanglement of alliances, treaties and military plans all of which were diplomatic attempts to overpower nations and prevent hegemony. Therefore, Germany entered in an alliance with Austria which made it inevitable to avoid a two-front fight but also focused its diplomatic efforts to overcome the Anglo-Japanese Treaty which was viewed “as an unnatural alliance” (p.22, p.74). Realism also emphasizes that states are willing to do anything despite public and foreign opinion to gain power and size. It suggests that since its reunification in 1870, Germany viewed its national interest in terms of power and acted aggressively to secure its means of authority. It can also explain why the “probable effect on world opinion,

Most people in Germany supported the emperor’s idea of “civil peace”. The other people who disagreed were forced to agree whether they like the idea or not. In August 1, 1914, German Emperor Wilhelm II gave a speech at the royal palace in Berlin filled with a crowd of 40,000 people. Wilhelm II desired to unite the country by telling his people that “all that matters now is that we Germans stand together like brothers” (Doc 1). The speech that he conveyed rallied up the Germans to hope for the unification of their country by standing up together as brothers to help unite Germany. Wilhelm II’s view of a “civil peace” was supported by an abundant amount of civilians.

The Nazi rise to power brought an end to the Weimer Republic, the German Parliamentary Democracy established after World War I” (Timeline of Events). Soon after Hitler became Chancellor, he expanded his beliefs and ideologies all throughout Germany. His only problem was, he didn’t when the presidency. Hitler knew that his Reich would never become as powerful as he dreamed if the president of Germany was not a Nazi. However, Hitler would soon get his

The unifier of the German Empire, Otto Von Bismarck once said,“ A government must not waiver once it has chosen its course. It must not look to the left or right but go forward.” In 1914, Germany and the rest of the world chose a path that few had predicted; a course of a prolonged, intense war that featured unparalleled suffering. In the end, there would be more than thirty-five million military and civilian casualties, with Germany suffering the most military deaths (2.1 million.)1 When the trenches cleared, Germany was left in ruins by the Treaty of Versailles. In 2017, I undertook the mission to change Germany’s fate in “Diplomacy”, the 1954 game by Allan Calhamer. I began the game with the similar pride and nationalistic spirit that

The buildup to the 1933 Nazi seizure of power in Germany was a turbulent time in German history. Much of the factors that led to this momentous event can be found by looking into the past of the Second Reich, the first true unification of Germany. The German attitude, a culture focused on militarism and loyalty to the state, flourished throughout Germany, becoming a standard view of the world among many Germans. The German defeat and Treaty of Versailles at the end of the First World War directly conflicted with the established German attitude. The interwar period also brought many political reforms and economic crises that raised tensions throughout the newly established Weimar Republic. With mass amounts of German citizens dissatisfied with

John Maynard Keynes claimed ‘[The] German empire has been built more truly on coal and iron than on blood and iron.’ Germany’s economy is one that has had a mixed effect on both the politics and culture of Germany. Throughout its history it has experienced huge economic growth and profound economic failures. German politics also followed a similar fate. However, these changes were important to leading Germany into new grounds and new problems, the most significant of which includes, what some describe as an inevitable dictatorship of Germany. For many years the rise of Nazism has been put down to the idea of the Sonderweg, a ‘special path’ which would lead Germany through a change between both authoritarian and democratic rule. It is also believed that it led Germany to war and conquest - such as the need for Lebensraum which developed after Bismarck’s Unification of Germany and later during France’s invasion of the Ruhr in the early 20th Century. Moreover, the Sonderweg builds on the idea that National Socialism was a continuation of previous German history; that a German dictatorship was inevitable. ‘Germany did not embark on a straight or undeviating special path towards aggressive nationalism and political dictatorship after 1848. There were to be many twists and turns along the way.’ Although the Sonderweg provides an acceptable basis in which the Nazi’s were able to come from, it does not explain how their aggressive policies existed in Germany, were their support

Germany’s systems of power and changing of governments in the period of 1890-1990 are radically diverse, suggesting a restless and problematic state. Germany has seen extreme poverty and success throughout the 20th century with undying nationalism throughout. The end of the short lived Nazi regime in 1945 brought about by Axis defeat. Much as the treaty of Versailles had inflicted years before, Germany was, once again controlled by its neighbours, another historical turning point. New era of allied control emerged splitting western and eastern political ideologies, saw the end

Since the unification of Germany in the late 19th century, attitudes of nationalism, Prussian militarism and expansionism saturated German society. As one can clearly see in the

about the final defeat of liberalism in Germany and the removal of Austria in all German