Essay

“I got up and pretended to study the pictures on the walls like I was a lover of religious art. When I got to the Merciful Mother right above Sinita’s head, I reached in my pocket and pulled out the bottom I’d found on the train. It was sparkly like a diamond and had a little hole in back so you could thread a ribbon through it and wear it like a romantic lady’s choker necklace. It wasn’t something I’d do, but I could see the button would make a good trade with someone inclined in that direction.

In this paper I am going to concentrate on comparing and contrasting how America and France’s economic and political policies choices combined with their cultural and historic backgrounds helped their current place on the word stage. It is undoubted that the United States and France are two of the strongest and most competitive countries in the world. Although they have almost the same economic system and same concept, they still have very different current situations which are closely bound up with their historic backgrounds and political choices. Through this paper I am going to discuss this topic through several sections.

List and describe the four force multipliers. How do terrorists us force multipliers? Give examples for each force multipliers.

The popular front led by Leon Blum, was the socialist government from 1936 which put in place the ‘Matignon Agreement’. Several developments established during the period of governing such as raising wages, and introducing the forty hour working week (James, 2003, p.124). Although they had in a sense united workers and employers, the adverse consequences resulted in a radicalised nation, with strong policing on tax evasion, and the reforms were substantially expensive (James, 2003, pp.124-125). Politically, the poor stability of the French economy didn’t allow Blum and his party to enforce their power across Europe. With the German economy recovering rapidly, and the vast military production, France simply didn’t have the resources to match up to the threat posed upon them (James, 2003, p.125).

First, it was interested in achieving world peace and to improve living conditions in Europe. Second, it was aiming for the greater goal for itself to create the ECSC. Subsequently, France was driven by its own interest to benefit from an economic partnership with Germany. Thus, the Schuman Declaration provides enough credibility for the idea of the ECSC. Withal, the reader should not completely discount the notion of peace keeping. It is likely, that France acted in its personal interest but saw more prosperity in the

Every country has its own agenda for its people and purpose for it’s military. Looking at the world nations, France is one of the most advanced nations that are currently an ally to the United States (US). Looking at the political, economic, and military situation of France can best describe the type of ideals and direction of focus the society has and will continue to have over the next few years or more.

Clemenceau: Since our Alsace-Lorraine area was forced to cede to Germany during Franco–Prussian War, the nationalism ideological trend took control of the whole France, and then effects its government since France is a democracy state ruled by elected officers like me. Based on the purpose of avenge, France started engage in arms expansion. At 1905, The Morocco Crisis sharpened the conflict between Germany and France based on the colony issues. Since that, France started expand its armed force on a fast speed. At 1914, the tonnage of France navy already become the third in European

“The representatives in the Congress of Vienna wanted to prevent France’s aggression by surrounding France with stronger nations, restore balance of power, so no country would be a threat to others and restore Europe’s royal families to the thrones they head held before Napoleon’s coquets” (Beck, 239). In order to make the weak nations around France stronger, the former Austrian Netherlands and Dutch Republic were united to form the Kingdom of the Netherlands. “Group of 39 German states were loosely joined as the newly create German confederation, dominate by Austria. Leaders of Europe wanted to weaken France, but also didn’t want to leave it powerless. If they did, the French might rebel to take revenge but if France became weaker and was broken up, another country might become so strong that it would threaten them all. France remained a major but diminished European powers” (Beck, 239). Nevertheless, not all-important decisions were made by the great powers.

Democracy, so essential a feature of European countries today, had had to make a bumpy and potholed journey. Basically in all European countries, democracy was nebulous and uncertain in the 19th century, albeit in varying degrees. In Britain, a parliamentary democracy was very much in full bloom, but the inherent love and pride of the British people for their monarchy pre-empted a switch to a full-fledged democratic form of government. As a result, these democratic institutions functioned under a monarchy that controlled the largest empire of the day. In France, the scene was different. In the absence of democratic institutions of the kind Britain had nurtured, the governance the French

There are very rare cases in with society can see eye-to-eye on every situation, thus arguments arise and two to three viewpoints are created. France is no exception, in Brain Jenkins’ schema Order versus Movement, Reaction versus Progress, Catholicism versus Anti-clericalism, Right versus Left he sheds light on how France may be homogeneous and fragmented. Two oppose groups are thus created, the Girondins and the Jacobins. There are many differences between the Girondins and the Jacobins as each group’s viewpoint clash. Both of their conflicting viewpoints are striving for for the same end goal: to secure and foster their nation. This notion has a correlation to present day United States of America with the Democratic and Republican parties;

But most importantly, countries coming together in open arms to support each other. The way it’s written like a sort of fact sheet helps it be more persuasive because you would read it and take it for fact. Mostly because the whole purpose of the article is to inform. I think the reason America supports the french so much is because they have given us our symbol of freedom and were our first ally. They also supported use during 9/11 so in my personal opinion I would support them fully for everything they have already

The National Front has chosen to remain highly eurosceptic and distrustful of European institutions, reinforcing the conclusion that any outside power undermines the notion of sovereignty (Marks and Steenbergen, 113). The pervasive nature of the European Union infringes on the nationalistic culture the National Front has persistently promoted. The “distinguishing qualities of what it means to be French would be lost in the process of integration” (Williams, 98). Despite the National Fronts staunch opposition towards political assimilation through European institutions, the party can (and does) promote policy through the European Parliament. The success of the party platforms stems from the National Front’s ability to take discernible social issues and form a clear solution through anti-immigration and eurosceptic

Thus far, the details of the main institutions of France and Germany have been outlined. The issue is now to compare these and highlight the weaknesses and strengths of each country against the other as regards such institutions.

The unification of Germany threw all of Europe off its axis. With the formation of this new power there were now five major powers instead of four. This would work to unsettle age-old alliances and confuse the entire European continent for more than twenty years. Not least among the nations swept of their proverbial feet was France. France was a rival with the German alliance long before it merged into one state, but the new stability of a unified Germany made it a much more powerful entity. France scrambled to try and establish a sense of security, immediately demanding compensation in the form of

France has a high level of economic development. The CIA World Factbook (2012) characterizes the French economy as "transitioning from an economy that featured extensive government ownership and intervention to one that relies more on market mechanisms" but cautions that the effects of the Eurozone crisis are dampening progress of the French economy. France has a GDP of $2.2 trillion, making it the 9th-largest economy in the world. The GDP per capita is around $35,000, which ranks 35th in the world, comparable with Japan and the United Kingdom, but trailing several other major industrialized nations including the US. France has a strong industrial sector but today is largely a 21st-century service economy.