Essay On 4th Amendment

1. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S Constitution says, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The fourth amendment was made to protect "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."("Understanding search-and-seizure law", 2018).

After the horrific terrorist attack on the date of September 11th, 2001 the U.S has passed a law to help prevent terrorist attacks. Through the use of tapping phone lines and checking citizens Internet usage. The U.S. department of Homeland Security’s purpose was to organize the National Security Agency, the Pentagon, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Central Intelligence Agency. The design was intended to product the people of the U.S. It allows the government to search people’s home without a warrant. The causal factors that allow the government search through without warrant are: emails, phones and search engine searches. There is a problem the 4th amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,

The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution is one of the ten amendments that makes up the Bill of Rights. It established that people are protected against “unreasonable searches and seizures” of their “persons houses, papers, and effects” and that a warrant may be issued if probable cause exists and it must describe “the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized” (HOW TO CITE THIS? U.S. Const., amend. IV)

As concluded, Fourth amendment provides the protection to U.S. citizens from unauthorized searches and seizures by law enforcement officers. Simply the law enforcement officer do not have any authority to perform searching on persons personal things or places, otherwise it would violate fourth amendment. In some special scenarios an officer may perform searches at any place, at times time is very short to get search warrant from judge or at emergency situations. Later he has to explain the correct or probable reason that makes him to perform search.

The Fourth Amendment states that “[the] right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” U.S. Const. amend. IV. The purpose of this guarantee is to prevent the government from unjustly laying claim to any information, items, or persons captured from such an intrusion.

Drug Searches are recently being questioned by students, teachers, parents, and administrators. The use of Dogs sniffing out drugs, in schools across America. Questions rise through the cracks asking if it is a violation of American rights. The fourth amendment guarantees “the right of the people to secure to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures (Ehlenberger, 31-35).” Administration has no justifiable reason to conduct random searches, thus breaking the fourth amendment. A myriad of court cases has concluded that there are questions about what constitutes reasonable suspicion. Cases brought to court, for example, two students told a teacher about another student will be bringing

The Fourth Amendment protects the right of citizens from illegal and unreasonable searches. The Fourth Amendment states that a soldier, government agent, or police officer is not allowed to search your home unless there is a probable cause. Unless, if a law enforcement officer were to believe that you may have committed a crime, a search warrant is needed. It is not legal and is considered a crime if a soldier, officer, etc were to check or take property without a search warrant. This gives citizens the freedom of privacy with their belongings.

Bang Bang “Police open up.” You head over to the door and open it up, the police rush in and start searching your house. They start to go through your kitchen and open up all your doors. The police can’t do that because of the 4th amendment, the 4th amendment is about search and seizures. The meaning and purpose of the 4th amendment has left an enduring impact on the U.S economy.

This week in class we went in depth of the 4th Amendment, which essentially protects people against unreasonable search and seizure. The problem with this amendment is that people may not know what is considered unlawful when it comes to them being searched so they tend to comply so they do not cause more trouble or risk being arrested. However, it is these searches that they could have avoided because they were not constitutional, yet an officer then finds probable cause after searching the individual and they are then arrested for the found item or evidence. It is important to note that it is the responsibility of average citizens to know their basic rights so they are not taken advantage of. I learned the reason why people who typically

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees the right of the people "to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." ("Fourth Amendment") In order to avoid an illegal search or seizure, the police must first obtain a search warrant "upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." ("Fourth Amendment") Despite these fundamental principles, the courts have been forced to recognize that there are times when a search or seizure is appropriate without a warrant.

?Privacy is one of the biggest problems in this new electronic age.[footnoteRef:1]? [1: Andy Grove http://quotesgram.com/img/privacy-quotes/9730413/]

Amazon should not share user data with the police without a specific warrant, otherwise it would violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Fourth Amendment affirms the people have the right to be secure in their, persons, homes, papers, and effects against unreasonable government searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment even protects a person's personal conversation with Amazon Echo, and may prohibit the use of the Echo in the courtroom as evidence in a court case.

According to The United States Constitution’s Bill of Right The 4th Amendment reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” (Archives.gov, 2015) The 4th Amendment was passed by Congress on September 25, 1789 and ratified on December 15, 1791.

As the late Frank Herbert once said, “Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” Federal electronic wiretapping and supervision dates to the Wiretap Act of 1968, and has only increased in the following decades. Organizations such as the National Security Agency have been empowered by FISA (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts) to bypass the authority of the Supreme Court in determining the constitutional validity on searches (Bamford). Government Surveillance is unjustified because it infringes upon personal freedoms, does not guarantee safety, and is not a vital necessity.