Essay On A Quilt Of A Country And Immigration Contribution

The essays are both very different, mainly in the way the authors define what an immigrant is. Loudon defines an immigrant as "someone who comes to a new place and enjoys what pioneers worked and died to create" (1). In contrast to Loudon's definition, Miller defines an immigrant as an individual that makes America unique; she states that nobody is technically from America. These definitions are unique to the opinion of the author, making their arguments personal. Although Loudon and Millers definitions are contradicting, they have a similarity; each provides

The diction and the tone of a story help structure a prompt for a writing work. The authors of “The Immigrant Contribution” and “A Quilt of a Country” uses diction and tone to build up their essays. Diction makes tone since the word choices produce how the author wants their audience to understand what he/she purposed on their writing. Without diction or tone, a writing would become boring and meaningless. Using the stories that were mentioned earlier, I will find how diction and tone support the author’s claim.

Simply put, America is the land of opportunity. In the past, immigrants have left most of their family, memories, and familiarities with their homeland in search of a better life in America, where jobs were easy to find and the economy was booming. These immigrants formed almost the entire American population, a demographic anomaly in which people from nationalities separated by land and sea; these people come from countries separated by expansive distances can live within the same neighborhood. Both Anna Quindlen with her essay “A Quilt of a Country” and John F. Kennedy with his essay “The Immigrant Contribution” have documented the story of these immigrants and what they have done to contribute to the great country of the United States of America. Both authors have written in their own unique style which has changed the reader’s perspective of their accomplishments, contributions, and sense of community in their new nation. In the essays “A Quilt of a Country” by Anna Quindlen and “The Immigrant Contribution by John F. Kennedy, they show similar writing styles by both using the formal diction in their writing, and contradict in the way that Quindlen takes a more poetic approach in her writing, while Kennedy, being the President of the United States, uses more sophisticated dictions.

On the other hand, the essays “A Quilt of a Country” by Anna Quindlen and “The Immigrant Contribution” by John F. Kennedy, they differ in the way that Quindlen tends to use the poetic diction in her writing, while Kennedy typically leans towards using the sophisticated diction in his writing. For example, in this passage found in Quindlen’s essay, the dictions of technical, poetic, and sophisticated are used. Quindlen writes: “Once these disparate parts were held together by a common enemy, by the fault lines of world war and the electrified fence of communism.” (Quindlen, 15) The poetic diction used in this section of the essay helps paint the picture that once, the United

Differences are the key to the Development of the U.S.A. Quindlen wrote “Quilt of a Country” and John F. Kennedy wrote “The Immigrant Contribution”. Both Authors agree that America was built in nobodies image, but in different styles. Quindlen thinks more about the wars, John.F. Kennedy thinks more about immigrants and Cultures. Although they wrote in very different styles they also had similar ideas about America. Quindlen believes this is a mongrel nation and John F. Kennedy believes that the nation was built by immigrants coming to the nation and becoming entrepreneurs that help our nation become what it is today.

In the United States, the cliché of a nation of immigrants is often invoked. Indeed, very few Americans can trace their ancestry to what is now the United States, and the origins of its immigrants have changed many times in American history. Despite the identity of an immigrant nation, changes in the origins of immigrants have often been met with resistance. What began with white, western European settlers fleeing religious persecution morphed into a multicultural nation as immigrants from countries across the globe came to the U.S. in increasing numbers. Like the colonial immigrants before them, these new immigrants sailed to the Americas to gain freedom, flee poverty and

“We are nation of immigrants. Some came here willingly, some unwillingly. Nonetheless, we are immigrants, or the descendants of immigrants, one, and all. Even the natives came from somewhere else, originally. All of the people who come to this country come for freedom, or for some product of that extraordinary, illusory condition. That is what we offer here—freedom and opportunity in a land of relative plenty.” (Middletown Journal 2005)

Both Quindlen and Kennedy believed that immigration joins the country together. Although having the same belief, they also had different concepts when it came to the issue. However they also shared some similarities in their vision. Quindlen and Kennedy often shared the same idea but they had different opinions on ways to cope with the issues that are around us. These differences include, the purpose of immigration, if it’s helping and if it will be good in the long run. Each author however, has a different approach to this issue. Nevertheless, both Quindlen and Kennedy had well thought views about immigration and both of their stories were very intelligent and informal.

After the establishment of the “acceptable” and “right” type of American, the neglect of Blacks, Native Americans, and European immigrants emerged. Although white European immigrants, were not identified and considered as “White American,” they were the closest group to them. Native Americans came after, and at the bottom were considered Blacks. After

Despite sharing the same topic there are not many similarities between these articles. Both of these articles look into why the textile strike occurred and the hardships that many immigrants were facing. These people went through many harsh times and were forced to work very long hours with little pay. The articles both explain how the work was difficult and children and women were forced to work just as hard. Then they both go on to explain that when the strike was over that they did make some progress with better laws that allow them to work more reasonable hours with a little bit better pay. Although both of these articles share a similar topic, they are very different in their structure.

One vital piece of evidence supporting the contributions of immigrants can be shown in the excerpt “The Immigrant Contribution”. This except by John F. Kennedy tells us immigrants are a part of America, as can be shown by “Once I thought to write a history of the immigrants in America. Then I discovered that the immigrants were American history”(Paragraph 1 Kennedy). This description of America summarizes the very thread of America, it shows how our country isn’t just made up of immigrants, it is just a immense colony of immigrants.

Kennedy and Quindlen have similar writing styles; the main similarity is is how they use short sentences, outside sources, and quotations. The main difference, however, is how Quindlen uses a lot of questions, and Kennedy knows his information on the subject that he is talking about, and he doesn't feel the need of help from the reader or others, because he already knows the basic information. Both “A Quilt of a Country and” The Immigrant Contribution” discuss patriotism and immigration. Firstly, “Daniel Boorstin wrote,’ of all the nations in the world, the United States was built in nobody's image’” (Daniel Boorstin 14).

The story is based on how immigrants would tell their story of the struggles that they had faced on their journey to the USA. People would build these squares on a quilt and it would tell the story on how they came to the US. This is a good Example of American Identity Because how are people from time after they were Imigrated and they had passes on going to know some of the struggles they had to face to get to America and the life they have

The definition of immigration is the action of coming to live permanently in a foreign country. There are many authors that write about immigration in their writing pieces. Even though authors write about the same subject (Immigration), they are still different for how they portray the story. The texts that are being compared is “The Red Umbrella” and “A Band-Aid for 800 Children”, they both have to do with immigration, but are very different in many ways.

My essay is about comparing and contrasting two stories. The first story is the quilt of a country. The second story is the immigrant contribution. The stories are both alike and different. The first similarity is both stories have to do with immigrants. “It tells us about different races.” the second similarity is both stories have to do with america. The third similarity is they both have to do with america's people. The story had some differences. In the first story the differences are that they only speak english. In the second story they speak many languages. In the first story they talk about 911. A very tragic day. In the second story they talk about industry. In story one they talk about a research center. In industry you can make a