Essay On American Socialism

“ Foner means that the main question of ‘ Why is there no socialism in the United States?’ has been layered down into very little distinctive questions. But this does not explain why the United States has not became a socialist , the problem is generally defined as the absence in the United States of a large avowedly social democratic political party. For example the Labour party of Britian, the French Socialist party, and the Communist party of Italy. American writers generally infer a mass socialist consciousness among the working classes of these countries. So the question ‘ why is there no socialism?’ really means, why is the United States the only advanced capitalist nation whose political system lacks a social democratic

Socialism is the underlying motivation behind communist movements in history. Socialists believe that it is unjust for a small amount of people to own the biggest portion of the wealth in society. This idea lead to the concept of a communist society, in which the existence of private property is eliminated in favor of government-owned property being shared among all it’s people. The government would provide jobs and care for all people equally. The idea was that through communism, there would be no social classes, thus eliminating alienation for any of the people in the society.

Socialism is an economic system based on government or public control production. In such a system the government chooses what is produced as well as the quantity, regardless on the demand. Socialism focuses on equality rather than value, and rewards the workers by the amount of time they put in rather than by the amount or value they produce. It also makes the people rely on the state for everything from housing, food and health care. China, Vietnam, North Korea, Venezuela, Greece and Cuba are the best examples of socialist countries. The most notable use and collapse of socialism was with the former U.S.S.R.

Socialism is defined as a centrally planned economy in which the government controls all means of production. Basically, the government is in control of all business in the country that adopts it as an economic strategy, in our case, The United States of America. Now when we dissect this idea of socialism we find that there are to thought processes behind it. Some truly believe that socialism could truly be the answer to the problems of our nation, both economically and morally. These people try to push socialist policies in hopes of helping the nation and they are doing so with the purest of intentions. However, there are also the people who completely understand what socialism leads to, and want nothing more than to gain while others

Socialism refers to a system in which production and distribution of goods and services is a shared responsibility of a group of people. Karl Marx developed the theories of socialism. He believed that socialism is the transitional period between capitalism and communism. In a state of socialism, there is no privately owned property. Under Capitalism, manufacturing enterprises dominate the economy but are privately owned and is operated to generate wealth for the owners and only a small fraction of the money is paid to the workers. In socialism, this is turned around so that the class that produces the wealth can together decide how the wealth will be used for the benefit of all. In short, socialism prioritizes human needs and eliminates the profit that drives war, ecological destruction, and inequalities based on gender, race, nationality and sexuality.

As mentions before socialism is the doctrine that espouses public ownership or control of a major means of production. It aims to achieve an equitable and efficient distribution of social goods and greater economic planning then exist under capitalism. Although the central concerns of socialism appears to be economic its ramifications extend to the moral, social and political realms, in fact together with nationalism, it is the leading ideological and political movement of the 20th century.

This November, nearly 130 million Americans will be casting ballots to determine the next president of the United States. In the months leading up to this year’s election, voters will be taking into consideration each nominee’s political views and ideals to decide which candidate is the best qualified for office. Among the several political controversies involved in the election, one in particular has captured the attention of Democrats and Republicans alike: the idea of introducing democratic socialism —a policy rooted in traditional socialism— to America. Amid the initial consternation surrounding the proposal, the following question still lingers in the minds of many; what would socialism would mean for America?

Socialism is a system that advocates the means of production distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. Socialism benefits the common populace and alleviates society’s problems of today. Socialism often carries many negative connotations, however it is not necessarily a bad malicious and possibly has many benefits. Socialism takes many forms. Socialism has played a role in many non-Communist or non-socialist countries’ systems of healthcare, education, and economics (Parry 2). Reasonable protections for people from market instability and exploitation from laissez-faire capitalism can make for a healthier society. Effective policies of the past, more importantly, American policies, were of a socialist

Socialism is immoral because at its core, once you strip away the camouflage of false compassion, it requires an acceptance that the government owns you, that when the rubber hits the road you are simply a number, and that if you are more productive than most other people you will be regarded as a cash cow to be milked for what some group of statists considers The Common Good. You can dress that up in the “party dress” of alleged compassion but it remains un-American and immoral.

Accordingly, one idea or fact that is often raised to differentiate socialism from communism is that socialism in general is the political movement that refers to an economic system in that they believe that the state should be in charge of all important producing industries thus taking hold of the control of free market in order to promote economic parity and egalitarianism. Theoretically, socialism seeks to distribute wealth equally among its citizens in a way that the rich don’t take

For individuals, socialism means an end to economic insecurity and exploitation. It means workers cease to be commodities bought and sold on the labor market, and forced to work as appendages to tools owned by someone else. It means a chance to develop all individual capacities and potentials within a free community of free individuals. It means a classless society that guarantees full democratic rights for all workers. Some socialist countries are Netherlands, Canada and Sweden .

I do not believe that pure Socialism will work for a couple reasons. One reason is that socialism, as well as Communism, are both based on the idea that the government is in charge of distributing

The socialist movement in its simplest form was the redistribution of wealth. In the United States today there are taxes that are imposed on every working American employee, business and corporation. One of these taxes is used to support the welfare system, which provides aid to financially unstable citizens. By all accounts this can be considered a socialist program. Another example is the Canadian healthcare system. They are able to supply free healthcare to all its citizens. Except it’s not really free, roughly about 22 percent of Canada 's tax dollars are used to fund their healthcare system.

Throughout American history, society has libeled no idea more than socialism. Groups seeking to suppress socialism have arrested, maligned, and abused the supporters of socialism as scapegoats for all of America’s problems. Because of this, it is vital to explain exactly what market Socialism is and what it entails. Socialism cannot be measured in state control of the economy but in worker control of the economy. In the Soviet Union, for example, although the state controlled the entire economy, socialism did not exist. Only a society where those who produce, in this case, the workers, control the production can socialism exist (D’Amato). Of course, there is a third option, which involves neither state control of the economy nor capitalist exploitation but involves true worker control over the marketplace and the economy’s engines. This is market socialism or as Anarchists call it, Mutualism (“Introduction”). In a socialist society, taxation and governmental programs would ensure certain rights such as health care and education are available to all. Finally, a modern socialist economy must include freed markets. Unlike “free” markets under capitalism, rigged by the largest businesses for their own benefit, both corporate and governmental, socialist “freed” markets would be predominantly made up of independent worker’s institutions such as cooperatives. Freed from the power of exploitive capitalist business, the market would exist to serve the needs of the American worker

In socialism, there are sure laws and objectives which focus asset and obligation portion. In the event that the residents submit to these laws, this prompts a concordant soul of sharing one objective. Subsequently, this fabricates more grounded social groups and a much more grounded economy.