Essay On Anarlo Gold Performance

With all elements of the analysis considered, it seems like the potential threats outweigh the strengths and opportunities, however the company’s strong financial performance results positions it as a low risk investment.

b) (2 pts.) Does either firm have a dominant strategy? If yes, which firm and what strategy?

The company does a lot of technology work. The best stock i had was Microsoft. I bought 111 shares of it and it went up 4.41% since i bought it. I made a total of $260 off of it. This was the stock that i had originally wanted to invest all my money into but i backed out of my plan and invested into multiple stocks to decrease my risk. The reason i had invested into seven stocks was that i knew some would drop and some would gain so i wanted to balance out my money that way if one stock started doing really bad i would have another one doing good, decreasing my risk. When i bought my stocks i decided that i would just leave them alone and see how the gain or decrease. I didn't want to keep selling and buying more. This strategy didn't work out so well because my US oil stock dropped so low. i should've sold it when it was reasonable and bout something that would make me money. Later down the road that stock would make me a lot of money when the price of oil goes up and that why i think i kept it instead of selling

As stated above these calculations can be of some interest to the right investor and that investor would need to do more calculations and more researching to find out whether either company is right for them. Researching these companies has opened my eyes to new ways to find out very important information that I might need if I were going to invest or even work at one of these companies.

Conclusion: Microsoft is the safer investment when you examine the liquidity and solvency ratios. Also, Microsoft has the clear advantage when you look at the profitability ratios of both companies. The stock market is more optimistic about the future of Oracle given the P/E ratio however Microsoft’s P/E ratio is not much lower than Oracle’s. Hence, I would certainly invest in Microsoft because of their fiscal

As you requested, this report outlines a publicly traded company’s information which will aide you in deciding if it’s a good investment. The topics covered are the company’s market position, growth potential, its ability to compete, its financial analysis and recent publicity. I researched and reviewed secondary research for this report.

These shares recommended below will give you the best return over a long-period of time:

"They have an excellent management team, an excellent strategy. They communicate well with shareholders. They hold themselves to a high degree of transparency. There are other company-specific things that they do well. They have very strong margins, returns and they seem very disciplined at maintaining those margins and returns. Generally speaking that should make for a good investment."

Telstra is Australia’s biggest telecommunications provider. Many Australians are familiar with the work of Telstra and their utilities can be found in most suburban houses. Stability in this company can be proven by the continuous uprising for the past four years. This rise will

This shows that the company is looking to benefit their stockholders, but their debt is the highest of three. Although their stockholder equity is the lowest, the biggest thing to consider is that the earning per share is substantially higher than the other two companies by more than half. This will most likely make it the riskiest investment, but will the most profitable.

The Quick Ratio also known as Acid Ratio is used by firms to determine liquidity position. It explains if the firm is able to pay all of their current debt liabilities. (Dyson, 2010) The graph above illustrates that over the period from 2007 to 2011 quick ratio was not more that 1, which means that their debts might not be covered all. The graph also indicates that a peak was in 2011.

The aim of this report is to recommend whether or not a publicly traded company has been is worth investing in. The company chosen in this case is JPMorgan & Chase which is a large financial institution. This report is going to use a financial rational formed by the analysis of various financial metrics.

These ratios help company in determining its capability to pay short-term debts. Liquidity ratios inform about, how quickly a firm can obtain cash by liquidating its current assets in order to pay its liabilities. General liquidity ratios are: current ratio and quick ratio. Current ration can be obtain by dividing company’s current assets by its’ current liabilities. Generally a current ratio of two is considered as good (Cleverley et al., 2011). Quick ratio also known as acid test determines company’s liabilities that need to be fulfilled on urgent basis. Quick ratio can be obtained by dividing quick assets by current liabilities. Quick ratio is considered as stricter because it excludes inventories from current assets. Generally a quick ratio of 1:1 is considered as good for the company. Higher quick

Many analysts would note that based on the consensus of the world population, the company’s equity is of the highest value as they are currently ranked as industry leader in market capitalization (source: Yahoo Finance) which conveniently brings me to my next evaluation.

The quick ratio reflects on a company’s ability to meet its current liabilities without liquidating inventories that could require markdowns. It is a more stringent test of liquidity than the current ratio and may provide more insight into company liquidity in some cases. For Colgate-Palmolive, the quick ratio has declined from 0.73 in 2008 to 0.58 in 2010. While this does not necessarily mean a problem, a higher current ratio and quick ratio analysis will mean that the company will not have difficulty in meeting its short-term obligations from its operations and not by liquidating its assets.