It is often said that the government control can be the threat for people because it means that the government dominates the country. North Korea is one of the examples that represents the government control. However, the problem of the government control is also disputed in America.
Both Anthem, the novel written by Ayn Land in 1938, and Trump Resistance, the protest against president Trump began in 2016, believe that their governments prevent them from living their lives freely and being treated equally. Therefore, they struggle against the authority which suppresses people and deprives citizen’s right in order to control the society smoothly.
Though Anthem argues that each person should create action by themselves and stay individually in the society, and Trump
…show more content…
Hence, this novel tries to be against to the government which controls the society and prevents people saying their thoughts freely. And in my opinion, this argument is justifiable claim.
Similarly, Trump Resistance also claims that the president and the government are the threat for citizens in US because they do not listen to their voices carefully. In addition, they argue that all people such as women, immigrants and other minorities have to be treated equally. According to Trump Resistance, protesters say “No to Trump and no to any future leaders who prey on our fear and lie to us plainly.”
The essence of protester’s argument is that the president and the government ought to respect what people in US demand and they should not be anxiety for citizen. So, what Trump Resistance argue is similar to Anthem.
And I think what protesters argue is right because now Trump’s policies send people in confusion because he does not pay attention to protesters
Ayn Rand’s novella, Anthem, depicts a totalitarian society that oppresses the ideology of individualism. Within these societies children live apart from their families and grow up without any inherited characteristics of being an individual. Anthem is an example of this kind of society because it showcases the link between a totalitarian dictator’s power to the oppression of individualism found in a children that live apart from their families. Totalitarian Dictators enforce the arrangement of children living separate from their families because it oppresses individualism and allows for a better grasp of beneficial control over a society.
Within the pages of Ayn Rand’s novel, Anthem, a government which resembles a dictatorship is exhibited. Both the leaders and the society itself seek to control mans body and mind as they follow ideals similar to that of a communist party. The leaders and society in Anthem seek to control mans mind using tactics such as collectivism and suppression of the past to accomplish a tyrannical end.
At the start of Anthem, a lack of free thought and individuality resulted from religious connotations in the negative form. The government dominating Equality’s society referred to all the information they wanted hidden from society through dismissive yet holy terms. On the contrary, beliefs that
Imagine living in a society where you have no control over your own life. In the book Anthem written by Ayn Rand, the characters are told how to live by the government. They have no control over their life, and they must follow the laws and rules. If any person breaks these laws and rules, they will be punished severely. There are no exceptions, no warnings, one strike and they’re done. In Anthem the government has enforced many rules. A few of the rules may include the “we” law, the “no affection” law and another law is how one must never write or talk about the Unmentionable Times. The government allows no human to live an uncontrolled life and they deserve to live their own lives.
The situation in Anthem is closely related to how Ayn Rand lived through the early years of the Soviet Union’s rise to power. The people of Russia were expected to everything for the state, and were expected to put their needs and wants on the back burner with no if ands or buts about it, and this is very much what was going on in Anthem.
In the story Anthem, members of the society are not allowed to do anything for themselves. Everything in their entire live is told to them by a council that has been told to do that by someone else. Nobody has complete control in the world, because everyone's job was told for them to by somebody else. The freedom of speech is blatantly absent from the story and after reading it, one could tell why it is so obvious yet so hard to see at the same time. The story tends to have the mention of the freedom of speech absent. It focuses more on things like, the freedom of preference, or the freedom to write.
An enslaved future in which people in a society are punished for wanting independence. This is the dark future Ayn Rand, author of Anthem, has set in this heart-wrenching dystopia. Ayn Rand sets the protagonist, Equality 7-2521, against his society to find the meaning of individuality and the sacred word “I”. Modern Day U.S society is much more progressive that Anthems’ society because of its’ individuality, education, and technology.
“I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; If I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do” (Robert Heinlein). Sometimes, there are certain rules where we will listen to them, and others that we do exactly the opposite of what is told. Either road you go, you will have to take responsibility for the choices you make. In Anthem, the major character, Equality, did exactly this. Anthem is written as a diary in the eyes of Equality, an individual living in a place where nobody knows what individualism is, to the point of not knowing words like I. Everybody works in groups, with their lives controlled by councils which makes an insane novella. In the novella, Anthem, written by Ayn Rand has a variety of rules which purpose is to create a dystopian government in which residents can’t express emotions, can’t make decisions for themselves, live in a communistic style of society, keeps the power in the hands of the elites, and as Equality creates a new society, some of these rules will exist and some will be different, either way, it will make a positive impact.
If you were to live in a society like the one in "Anthem," wouldn't you stand up for your rights? I know I would. Yet in Ayn Rand's novelette "Anthem," no-one chooses to oppose against the leaders of the society. Why is that? In my opinion I think people never argued against the leaders because they were manipulated into believing lies, many lies that pretty much control every piece of them.
Set in the age where government has become synonymous with oppressor, Anthem by Ayn Rand focuses on the perspective of Equality, a boy who grew up nestled underneath the boot of collectivism trying to find an identity. Equality’s narrative expresses both Rand’s fears and hopes for the society where government threatened to rein all. To comprehend fully what devices and mechanics that Rand did to implement her predictions of civilization under the tyranny, you must take into consideration the rhetorical theories of great rhetoricians like Plato, Aristotle, and Cicero. While Plato and Cicero’s theories explained details and choices, Aristotle’s theories explained how Rand introduced her paramount message and supported it.
The society in which the characters from Anthem by Ayn Rand live in is one of little to no opposition. The World Council made rules at their own discretion and the citizens followed them without question. The big question, though, is why. Why did the citizens mindlessly follow the rules and restrictions of the World Council? The citizens of this futuristic society followed their leaders because they were suppressed. They were trained to believe that the World Council was smarter than them, they were lied to about their jobs and the “common good,” and anyone who thought differently was punished. These three things are seen in several places throughout the novel, highlighting how much the citizens in the futuristic society of Anthem were suppressed in order for the State to remain in power.
Losing Individuality in Anthem is an everyday thing that the society people must deal with. Anthem is different, because in its society where a person has no voice, the town’s government expects the people to have no free rights. Losing individuality comes from strict laws, loss of family, and control of education.
The novel Anthem by Ayn Rand is set in a totalitarian, collectivist society in which individuality, as well as many other things, is viewed as a crime. Throughout the story, Equality 7-2521’s views on these laws change. He begins with the feeling of guilt for going against the leaders, but by the end of the story, Equality feels no regret or shame for his transgressions. The shift in Equality’s appraisal of his actions is equitable because the leaders of the society deliberately took away his individuality and withheld significant informations from him.
Being that Anthem takes place in a futuristic totalitarian world, its ideals are purely single minded. Usually, totalitarian regimes have a firm grip on every aspect of the lives of the citizens; Anthem’s society is no different. An article from Samizdata explains, “The thing that makes a place totalitarian is not the nastiness of it, or even the repulsiveness
Imagine a world where every aspect of your life is controlled. Everything from your job to your house is regulated for you. This is known as a dystopia. In a dystopia, the government controls citizens’ lives to constitute a false image of a perfect society. The world in Ayn Rand’s Anthem closely resembles a dystopia. Anthem is a story about a person’s experience being a rebel in a collectivist society. This person, known as Equality 7-2521, broke the rules of his society to realize himself as an individual. After sneaking out to his secret tunnel, falling in love, breaking out of jail, and escaping to a house in the Uncharted Forest, the resolution of the story includes him declaring his commitment to make individualism an important concept