Essay On Ban Animal Testing

Animal testing in unhelpful when it comes to experimentation. The research that is done on animals is rarely sufficient for humans. Even when the animal test was a success it rarely works on humans. It's also unhelpful in the fact that animal should have rights to. We place their lives in our own hands which is unfair.

Animal testing is not only beneficial to human but also animals, at least to those who are not used in the experiments, such as pets and endangered species. Along with researching for new treatments and medicines for

There is much debate over whether animal testing should be allowed or not. Some people think that it is not essential to sacrifice animals for human benefits because they are being abused and tortured severely during experiments. Some others who stand against animal testing claim that humans eliminate many lives on earth in order to safe humans’ lives, so there is no justice because even animals have the right to live on earth, yet these people do not consider the truth that animals are being used in the food industry or in the laboratories. Thus, if someone asks how many animals are being used in the laboratory experiments around the world every year, who can give an accurate answer? It can be one, ten, or fifty million. It is difficult to find the exact figure on this question because people only read news through mass media such as having a new vaccine which can help human avoid uterus cancer or a new medicine help humans cure strokes, but they also need to know how many lives of the animals would have to take in order to get theses vaccines. Therefore, some organizes think that animal testing is one of the most disturbing experiments ever, and it should be banned. Despite many controversies with opposing opinions, a compromise can be made in order to reduce the use of animals in the laboratory experiments.

This helps to ensure the results are as reliable as possible and allows progress in many fields of science it is important that everyone follows these regulations in order to maintain a high quality of research. Animal research has led to much advancement in scientific research and even continues to help the animals themselves, as our knowledge increases we need to use fewer animals to get the same results and in some cases have even been able to replace animals with non-sentient alternatives (House of Lords, 2002). I believe the procedures and policies in place do a good job of limiting animals in research to the minimum needed and do as much as is possible to ensure animals are treated as well as possible with as little pain, suffering or stress caused as is practicable (Bennett,

Everyday animals are being locked up in cages and are being tested on. Animals in laboratories do not provide reliable results in human beings, and are going through cruel and inhumane tests. There are also alternative methods that replace the need for the animals. Testing animals has contributed to many life savings cures and treatments, along with animals themselves benefiting from the results of the testing. Animals are also similar to humans in many ways and are appropriate test subjects. Animal testing needs to stop because every year 100 million animals die. The animals have no say in this treatment being done to them. Animals cannot be tested in a variety of human procedures despite what the benefits are.

If people took the time to research the actual tests animals are forced to undergo, they would be appalled by the inhumanity of the whole process. There is only one piece of legislation in the United States that regulates animal testing in laboratories. The Animal Welfare Act, first passed in 1966, has not

Testing animals has been going on since 500 bc. Testing on animals is extremely wrong and not a good procedure to do. Animal testing is done on 26 million animals a year. Because so many animals are tested on each year, more money is wasted than the government researches dollars, many animals have died over the years. 87% of the studies have killed animals

Many argue that animal testing is misleading or unsafe and some even believe there are alternatives for all animal research. However, where there are reliable alternatives, most certainly, scientists and many other professionals have used them, that's what the law demands. Advanced computer systems, mathematical models, human tissue and cell cultures can be helpful; but they cannot provide the answers that animal research can (Blakemore, 2008). Moreover, no researcher chooses to use and test on animals where there is no need. Animal research is time consuming and expensive, therefore no scientist gains pleasure from causing an animal suffering and wasting his/her time while doing so. Secondly, critics argue that using animals in the lab to

Animal research refers to the use of non-human animals for testing or experimenting on. The first recorded use of animals for testing started with the Greeks in the third and fourth century BC. The use of animals for testing is usually in the basic fields of; biomedical research, security, evaluation and education of a product. It is estimated that almost 50 million—100 million animals are tested on and killed annually, but this is usually done to make a product safer for humans.

An animal is taken, injected with all kinds substances, then killed from the tests ran by researchers. Meanwhile, an old woman is laying on her death bed waiting for the same researchers to find a cure but dies before researchers can succeed. Which scenario do you think is worse? This is a difficult question and may not have an answer. Animal testing has been around for centuries starting with early Greek physicians around 384 BC. These Greek physicians included Aristotle, Erasistratus, and Galen, who all created huge contributions to medical history. Throughout history animal testing has helped to cure many diseases including polio, diabetes, smallpox, and many more. These cures have helped save thousands of lives and would not have been possible without the help of animals. However, these contributions did not occur without the cost of hurting animals in the process. There have been some laws, like the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, that requires safety testing of drugs on animals before they can be sold. Both animal lives and human lives are affected by animal testing in many ways, making this topic very important. 100 million animals die each year due to animal testing but there are also many diseases that haven’t been cured, making animal testing necessary. Animal testing has both saved lives and taken them away. Us humans have to decide how many animal lives are worth the knowledge gained. In this paper I will address and analyze two alternate perspectives,

Animal testing has been around for centuries. It started out for curiosity reasons; people wanted to learn more about the internal construction of the body and animals were convenient—more so than humans. When it comes down to it, the word animal testing and animal research are interchangeable, moreover, both relate to the same meaning: the use of animals in scientific experiments. One of the scientists that made the first major use with animal testing was Louis Pasteur in the finding of milk pasteurization. However, while his conclusions were beneficial as a result from animal testing,that was back in 1880 and a considerable amount of technology has advanced since then. Biomedical research in the past has benefited from animal testing, but now, in 2016, animal research is concluded to be cost ineffective, increasingly inaccurate, and most importantly, how inhumane animal testing really is. Technological advances have happened since the late 1800s and hologram guided surgeries have become available, as well as microfluidic chip testing—all which can help provide a more accurate version of testing than we have been able to do in the past. Animal research has been talked about again and again, only this time, medical advances are finally becoming better and more useful than testing on animals. We must use this information and once and for all move towards the  advancement in limiting the number of animals used in testing, all while reaching for those alternatives in

According to CBSNews.com, animal testing has risen 73% in the last fifteen years. It is estimated that by the end of this year, over 100 million animals will have been used for experimentation. While some people believe that use of animals for experimentation is imperative in order for medicine to

Ricky Gervais, an English comedian and actor, once said, "Dear intelligent people of the world, don't get shampoo in your eyes. It really stings. There. Done. Now f***ing stop torturing animals." (Gervais). Although people may receive Mr. Gervais’ words as harsh, his message contains truth, that people need to stop testing on animals. Animals need to stop being the center of laboratory and farm experiments, or at least given more rights to protect their general welfare and life. Scientists started using animals in testing in 1851 as a part of learning in the classroom at universities (ProQuest). Animals started to be used because doing the experiments on humans would be viewed as unethical and inhumane, but should not the treatment of

Animals in the United States are suffering from a lack of intervention in the testing being performed on them by the animal testing industry. This testing often times creates a great deal of controversy. The reason why there is controversy is the lack of animal rights, animals can be hurt and abused, and too many animals are involved in this barbaric system.

Did you know that our of the 767.622 animals used in research and experimentation forty percent undergo cruel and unethical experiments? That is almost half of all the animals used in experimentation. Some animal researchers claim that the animals they are experimenting on are dealt with ethically. But the statistics show otherwise. Over the past year, 100 million animals have died during these experimentations. Including monkeys, birds, fish, dogs, cats, hamsters, frogs, mice, rats, guinea pigs, and much more that have not been mentioned. Based on these facts, it can said that even though animal experimentation has helped further some medical research and knowledge, we should not depend on it because it is inhumane, unethical, and unreliable.