Essay On College Athletes Are Not Paid

College athletes should not be paid to play the given sport they participate in. And as of right now, this statement stands true for the most part but is starting to become blurred and pushed extremely hard for. Over the years the NCAA and other organizations have had many conventions and uproars over the subject of whether or not college athletes should or should not be paid. The main two sports that this debate come up in are men's college basketball and college football, especially during march madness and the college football national championship. Now, I respect anyone who puts in the time, work, and excitement college athletics bring to the world or sports, but they should not be paid.

Many believe that college athletes should not be paid. The main debate against compensating college athletes is that they are at the university for educational purposes and playing sports is a benefit. The NCAA states, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (McCauley 10). Universities get all the financial benefits of the money earned from sports played from things such as team jerseys, sports passes and tickets, etc. Many argue that it is only fair to give a portion of the profit to the players that earned the money. It is very important when arguing for or against paying college athletes to not take into fairness, but to hold

College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.

Collegiate sports have grown throughout the years, making the National Collegiate Athletic Association, better known as the NCAA, a multimillion industry. Everyone within the industry gains their share of the revenue made, for example— the coaches and training staff— however, the college athletes, who are the main reason the NCAA makes all their revenue, do not gain anything. College athletes not receiving pay from the money they bring in is absurd and unfair, especially for them who sacrifice so much. This is a much debated topic, especially in the world of sports where any topic can escalate into a heated argument in a heartbeat from a disagreement. However, it is time for these athletes to receive the pay that the NCAA is pocketing from them; their sacrifice should no longer go unnoticed.

year, yet not one penny goes to the athletes who make it all happen. These

Does it make sense for colleges to run a multimillion dollar entertainment business? The idea of paying college athletes has increased in popularity in recent years. People believe that the athletes should get compensated for their time and money they make for their schools. It may seem like a legitimate argument, but paying college athletes are not why schools are built. Instead, colleges should focus more on educating students and athletes.

College athletes being paid has become an interesting debate in recent years. People are starting to get different feelings of the old way of not paying amateurs. Profits are so easily made in today’s age through social media, advertisements, apparel, and ticket sales, that programs are bringing in millions of dollars each year off the likeness of their athletes. Athletes dedicate their lives to the sports they play and it consumes their time. Data shows that some colleges do bring in millions of dollars a year in profit, but many colleges around the US are struggling to break even. Should college athletes be rewarded for their hard work and dedication? Opponents of paying college athletes point out that they are rewarded through scholarships,

College athletes are among the most hardworking individuals as they work to balance life as a young adult, collegiate studies, and the strenuous requirements that are involved in practicing and performing for their sport or sports of choice. These students athletes generally do not have time in their routines to add in additional employment that they may need in order to fund their lives while attending college and living away from home, often for the first time. The athletes are household names, the faces of the colleges, and hometown heroes yet they often cannot afford to enjoy the fruits of their labor. This is due to the legalities that are involved in regards to college athletes not being paid for extra curricular activities. Outside of the scholarships that are generally rewarded to the athletes in order to pay for their education,

Imagine if you were told that you had to work 43.5 hours a week, but you were not being paid for the work by your company or business. Would anyone be okay with that? Even if they love what they do, nobody would want to work that long for free. That is exactly what college athletes are being held asked to do. An investigation following a lawsuit by two former University of North Carolina students uncovered that most student athletes spend more than 40 hours per week in practice, the weight room or training room of their facility (Jacobs). Add on to those hours the hours of playing time, and it seems clear that student athletes deserve to be paid to play.

It’s an average day in life for an athlete in college. The alarm goes off at 4:00 AM to get up and go practice. You then go eat and then have another practice at 8:30 AM and after that you have class. You rush to class for a couple hours. After class you have a work out and film to rush to.

Have you ever done a job that brought in millions of dollars, but you didn’t get any of the profit. In America, college athletics are making over millions of dollars, but the athletes don’t get any of the money. The money could potentially help athletes in the future, especially if they get hurt, because they are easily proned to injury while playing most sports. Some think that college athletes should not get paid because they are part of an extracurricular, but the sport actually qualifies to be more like a full time job. Even though college sports are considered to be an extracurricular, athletes should get paid, because they are the ones bringing in the money, and they are at a high risk of injury.

College athletes are working so hard for their Universities every day. They are responsible for increasing revenues but aren’t rewarded with any monetary compensation. These students are working for their schools and are doing a service that seems to be overlooked. Some may argue that these athletes are being exploited by their schools, tv, and video games, which make millions of dollars off of intercollegiate athletics. Colleges are just using these hard working athletes to increase their reputations. Compensation of athletes I believe is necessity not only to keep competition at a constant level in college athletics, but also to encourage students to want to graduate high school, and get their college degrees. Everywhere else in this

In America people are paid for virtually anything nowadays; but for some reason we hold our superiorly achieving college athletes to a different moral standard where they showcase their highly profitable talents for free. College athletes such as Ben Simmons and Lonzo Ball, whose names alone bring in sell out crowds everywhere they go, are not paid, yet bring in insurmountable of profit to universities that not otherwise be possible. This begs the question: Do college athletes deserve to be paid for their time, skill, and profit they bring to the universities? College athletes should get paid for their play due to the fact that their job is working for their teams, the university makes enormous amounts of money off of them, and sometimes a

Another argument in the case for college athletes to be paid would be that the scholarships that are offered to athletes aren’t enough to cover the lost wages they would gain from working a job. Even though some athletes are offered full ride scholarships to great universities, they aren’t enough to pay their rent and other bills that they have. With athletes committing so much time for sports they do not have the time to get a job and pay for their bills and other things they need. This puts more strain on the athletes and can cause them to drop out of their respective sports and when that happens they ultimately lose their scholarships. College athletics are more demanding than a full-time job should pay their athletes for their services provided to the university they play for. The wages lost by athletes at universities are even greater than those working typical eight-hour days. Since athletes, football in particular, commit an immense amount of time to their sports they could be obtaining a wage far greater than the amount of the scholarship they obtained for attending and participating in sports at a university. Another point to be made would be that only a small portion of the people associated with college athletics receive full scholarships. This means that not only are athletes committing so much time and effort for sports, they must pay out of pocket for the portion that their respective

College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes