Essay On Difference Between Apple And Apple

Even though, Samsung Company exists longer than Apple Company, it has number of major advantages and disadvantages. One of the biggest disadvantages of Samsung is that it has lost in the court against Apple and was forced to pay huge amount of money to Apple, thus undermining the authority of the company as a whole. On the other hand, the advantage of the Samsung is that it exists longer than Apple Company and has its well-established world-known brand and customer loyalty. Similarly to Samsung, Apple is also well-known company and advantage of that is that it is still growing company and has tendency to expand even more. According to the aspects described above, there are no major disadvantages related to Apple, which makes this company looks better comparing to others.

Samsung products range from mobile devices, TV, audio and video, home appliances, cameras, PC and peripherals and print solutions (Samsung 2014). This essay will predominantly look closely at Samsung’s mobile phones market.

In 2014 both Apple and Samsung sold a combined total of about 108.2 million units of their products! Samsung sold about 71 million units while on the other hand Apple sold 94.75 million units. For the past few years, the competing and comparison between Apple and Samsung was at its maximum. Fights started between people to prove an idea about which company is the best but they did not know that they were only comparing their smartphone. That is not the only thing a person should concentrate at while comparing two of the biggest multinationals in the world. People should look at the sales of all of the company’s products, their profits and losses, the history of the company, and the reviews of the people about their

Innovation, localization and customization, and an efficient and environment-friendly global supply chain are the pillars of growth for Lenovo. Cost-innovation, efficient execution of strategy and a strong presence in China support its global endeavours. In-house manufacturing reduces costs and strategically located manufacturing facilities in China, Mexico and India enhance the efficiency global supply chain. It spends adequately on R&D to move ahead with the times. The R&D centres are located in North America, Japan, and China. Joint ventures and local-level innovation supports its customer oriented focus. Over the years, it has leveraged its strong presence in China, pursued incremental innovation and used inorganic growth strategies to its advantage (Ahrens & Zhou 2013). Further, geographical diversity helps it avoid overdependence on a particular market or product. Cultural diversity, supported by an inclusive organisational culture, facilitates Lenovo’s efforts to build a sustainable competitive advantage (Lenovo

Strong position as a technology leader – Even if Lenovo is ranked as the world’s No. 1 PC maker it would not be able to achieve success without being a mobile tech leader. The smart-phone business will prove to be a key for success for Lenovo

Samsung truly caters to their consumers by making product consumers use for everyday life. Samsung continues to maintain brand loyalty with consumers

As direct exporting is the new proposed strategy in 3.1.1, Lenovo will be focusing on the pressures for global integration which is to seek cost reduction through economies of scale and arbitrage benefits. As Lenovo wanted to attain competitive advantage through cost leadership strategy, they first have to cut down their cost in order to be able to sell product with lower price. Hence, the pressure of global integration in cost reduction is identified there.

3.1 Specific: Samsung follows a target-oriented simple approach and seeks first mover advantage and enjoys economies of scale. However, Samsung could more its functioning strategy more dynamic. Also, the way Samsung has dominated and swept aside competition in low-end smartphones market, it should employ similar methods to invade market share of the “Others” in the tablet market. This would protect it from its threats of competition and emergence of new

In this report, the secondary data is used to assess and apply the use of economic theories and other relevant issues. The key findings of this report were that Lenovo is a US$39 billion fast growing business with its success completely depending on its innovation, high efficiency in global supply chain and for maintaining a strong business strategy that differentiates it from its competitors like Dell and Hewlett-Packard (hp).

Product Offering: Over the years, the features that are demanded by consumers has drastically changed and assuming that change would be constant, Lenovo can invest heavily in research and development of new products and technology offering features such as mobile form factor and high-speed internet access. Lenovo also needs to form strong partnerships with other manufacturers and retailers so that it can bundle products together to increase the total value for the user in a single

Samsung is focused on producing devices which can be integrated with most of the software and OS. This gives Samsung products an edge over Apple’s devices, especially as Android and other OS are gaining market share when iOS and OS X are losing it.

This is because Lenovo is offering an affordable price through direct exporting which related to the cost leadership strategy. The Cost leadership is an effective business-level strategy to the extent that a firm offers low prices, provides satisfactory quality, and attracts enough customers to be profitable. (citation)

In recent years, the personal computer (PC) industry has been developing by leaps and bounds. Global sales of PCs totaled 230 million units in 2006, representing a 9 percent increase over the previous year. Lenovo has a product line that includes everything from servers and storage devices to printers, printer supplies, projectors, digital products, computing accessories, computing services and mobile handsets, all in addition to its primary PC business, which made up 96 percent of the company’s turnover as of the second quarter of 2007.

Acer’s strategy has been described as “divide and conquer.” Compare and contrast this to Lenovo’s strategy

Briefly describe the strategy for leveraging the current Lenovo brands with the new tablet product.