Essay On Domestic Policy Advisors

Domestic policy differs from foreign policy, which deals with a nation’s relationship with other nations, domestic policy tends to be more visible and often more controversial. The relationship between domestic and the other nations is also commonly linked by the influence of border security, improved infrastructure, surging economy, domestic culture, political, religion, social attitudes, and many other variables. American focus on national security strategies to protect the United States, promoting economic prosperity, creating peace through strength, and gaining American influences in the world. Our relationship with other nations can vary depending on each belief or values. A basic aspect in the relation between domestic and other nations is the importance of national identity and consistent needs to protect such values. Domestic and foreign policy can be distinguished as two separate concepts in international relations, because some nations do not have a similar set of objectives. Domestic sources play their role in the forms of compromises between social structure and elements of the government. The influence of the domestic policy forms the basis of foreign strategy. The relationship between domestic and other nations are separable in the sense that global politics play a major role in the modern global society and the conduct of states in

The Secretary of State is an official of the Federal Government that heads up the U.S. Department of State. The Secretary of State is appointed by the President, and is the highest ranking appointed executive branch official. A Secretary of State’s main concerns deal with foreign policy, and the position is considered to be the United States successor to the Minister for Foreign Affairs job. The Secretary of State as well as the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Treasury, and Attorney General are thought of as the four most important cabinet members. As the highest ranking member of the cabinet, the Secretary of State is the third-highest official of the executive branch of the Federal Government, after the President and Vice President. Six Secretaries of State have gone on to be elected President. The Secretary of State, with the counsel of the Senate, is the President’s main foreign affairs representative. The Secretary of State carries out foreign policies through the Foreign Service and the State Department of the United States. The duties of the Secretary of State in relation to foreign policy hasn’t changed that much since the late 1800s, but they have become much more complex and complicated as international countries evolved and multiplied. The secretary of State has many duties within the inner circle of the President, as The Secretary of State acts as the President 's first adviser on current issues within United States foreign policy. It’s also their job to

The arguments made by Federalists and anti-Federalists regarding the office and powers of the presidency during the ratifying debates that followed the drafting of the Constitution in 1787 were persuasive, but distinctly at odds. Both sides, however, sought the same thing, how best to allocate power in a unified republic of states? From this question opposing views developed as to whether or not a President should even exist, and if so, what powers he should be granted. I will briefly examine the presidential powers that were primarily awarded under Article II of the new Constitution. I will then explore the opposing arguments that arose during the ratifying debates concerning those granted powers. I do so in the interest of offering a

Abstract: This paper will speak to the duties of the cabinet that surrounds the President. In the text I will identify each cabinet position with a brief description of their role and importance to the president. The paper will prove that the president him/herself cannot do this job alone, an example from the Bush administration will also be included following the duties portion of the paper. All in all, the cabinet will be explored with their operational functions in the United States government.

The main role of the Secretary of State is to serve as the President’s Chief Foreign Affairs adviser. The Secretary also “carries out the President’s foreign policies through the State department & the Foreign Service of the United States”. Some of the Secretary of State’s specific tasks includes “conducting negotiations relating to U.S. foreign affairs, granting & issuing passports to American citizens and exequaturs to foreign consuls in the United States, supervising the administration of U.S. immigration laws abroad, and promoting beneficial economic intercourse between the United States and other

It is made up of the president, presidential advisors, and foreign policy bureaucracies. The president is the spokesperson for and to the nation. His responsibilities include being the commander in chief of the armed forces, negotiating treaties, and appointing ambassadors. The most important of the presidential advisors in the national security advisor. Led by the national security advisor is that National Security Council. The National Security Council (NSC) is in place to advise and assist the president on national security and foreign policies, and they serve as the president’s principle arm for coordinating these policies among various government agencies. The NSC was established under the National Security Act of 1947. The State Department is a cabinet-level department that manages the foreign affairs budget and resources. The State Department is required by Congress to certify countries and meeting targets on human rights, arms control, and reducing drug trafficking in order to be eligible for foreign aid. The executive branch makes and carries out foreign and military policies through these

While the President may believe that the US is doing more and gaining almost nothing from having military bases in East Asia, the reasons which will be explained below will argue otherwise with the full intention of convincing the President to continue the political stance taken by previous Presidents. The Trump administration may think that US bases in the East Asian region is not mutually beneficial, but a parasitical relationship, but numbers, statistics, and data beg to disagree. Even from a logical standpoint of diplomacy, the US gains a lot by having its military bases in the region. The President is considering withdrawing our troops if these countries “don’t do their part” but political experts concur that these countries indeed do and exceeds what’s expected of them. While on the veneer, the US receives nothing in return the following paragraphs of facts and logic may convince the President that having such bases is more favourable. The US should unceasingly extend our support to our allies in East Asia and other regions all over the world because it will be beneficial to project our military power and denuclearization is the way of the future.

I am a campaign advisor for an emerging political party called the Egalitarian Party of the United States. This party is still quite new on the political scene and lacks widespread credibility. Nonetheless, we are hoping to have a definitive impact on the upcoming federal election in the hopes of generating a strong base of support and priming ourselves for great prosperity in the near future. For our party, the issue that is of most significant and pressing consequence in United States is that of income inequality. As a western state, the US currently operates based on capitalist ideals that benefit large corporations and the wealthiest portion of the population. Although this system looks good on the surface, it has proven to have debilitating consequences on the vast majority of the population. Most new wealth being generated goes directly into the pockets of the top 1%, which has caused the middle class to shrink and has stunted economic development. In order to obtain success, our party must frame the issue in a strategic and constructive lens that mobilizes voters and engages the population as we fight for economic equality. Our party will have to be very cognizant of how it conveys its message if it hopes to gain respect and recognition going forward, and there are a number of strategies relating to political psychology that will be effective if implemented properly.

In exploring the basis on which the U.S President is considered to hold dominant authority in regard to foreign policy making, and whether the Congress ought to hold a significant role in the foreign decision making process, it is imperative to take into account the executive powers vested on the U.S presidency. This paper posits that the Presidency should be considered to be dominant, while at other times the Congress should be considered to be the dominant authority. In this perspective, it is essential that the Congress plays an important role in the foreign policy making process, since the most important feature of the U.S system is the division of powers.

The presidency ranks among the most important in the United States. Under the Constitution, the President serves as head of the state and head of government. The President has the tremendous power to initiate as well as implement foreign policy through response to foreign events through Commander in Chief, and negotiate treaties as Chief Diplomat, which is greater power than over domestic matters. The President has two additional informal but influential powers in foreign affairs, the ability to decide the national plan by addressing issues that the public might have, and the power to compel the nation to a particular course of action. The president also has the power to recommend foreign policy officials such as Secretary of State.

Why is US foreign policy pulled to extreme of either doing too much or nothing at all?

Eisenhower’s presidency, overall, was effective. Despite the many negative effects his foreign policies had on society, they also had positive aspects to them, allowing for some sort of balance to be created and set forth. Moreover, Eisenhower’s domestic policies was also contributed to his overall presidency’s effectiveness. For instance, he had created multiple civil rights acts to address certain humans rights such as voting. This was one of the major conflicts that many wanted to be adjusted and Eisenhower did do so through the multiple acts put in place. Adding on, another domestic policy would be the Federal Aid Highway Act, where roads and highways were developed, helping the nation’s economy and transportation. Both of these policies

The presidency occupies a unique position in all systems of government including the American system of government. The formal powers and the constitutional position occupied by the institution of the presidency are at the core of all national and international politics (Alexandrova & Timmermans, 2013). The President can serve as Commander-in-chief, nominate and appoint ambassadors, just to name a few of the powers of office. However, there is another power that is often overlooked by most, the power of agenda setting. The Constitution does not directly state this power, but it is heavily implied. This paper scrutinizes the institution of the presidency in line with agenda-setting literature. The agenda setting process relates to a series of streams, circumstances, or activities within public policy institutions and processes. The agenda setting process has three streams that incorporate the problem stream, the policy stream, and the politics stream. The problem stream relates to potential policy problems that may have different magnitudes attached to them. The policy stream associates with an agglomeration of potential solutions to policy problems (Eshbaugh-Soha, 2010). Additionally, the politics stream links to those policy issues and solutions that

I have always been interested in a career as a policy advisor. This role would give me the opportunity to gain experience and develop skills in policy advising, within a large and diverse government agency that suits my qualifications and interests. Policy advisory fits well with my Law and Arts degrees and I have tailored my law degree towards a business focus, which would fit well with the issues that MBIE deals with. Further, the team focus of the role also appeals to me as the collaborative nature of the public sector and MBIE in particular suits my working style well. Finally, I believe that I have a unique perspective to bring to policy research, analysis and advice and I would love to have an opportunity to apply this perspective to

As the commander in chief, the president plays a significant role in shaping foreign policy. The president possesses the power to appoint senior cabinet members, commit troops and conduct high level talks with foreign governments. Congress, on the other hand, has the power to ratify treaties, confirm the president’s appointees and approve budgetary measures. And while the president has the ability to commit troops, only Congress has the authority to declare war. Despite criticisms of the American policy making process describing it as inefficient and slow moving, the main purpose and thus benefit of the constitutional separation of power is the framework of checks and balances that safeguard against monopolization of foreign policy decision making.