Many influential thinkers view foreign aid as one of the best tools for eradicating poverty. However, my aim is to prove this belief wrong by demonstrating that if the capital is given to the wrong types of government then it works to further perpetuate inequalities. Nations thrive only when they establish inclusive governments—ones that promote free markets that permit citizens to not only spend freely but also to invest to promote the flow of capital. On the other hand, governments that use authority to consolidate power in the hand of only a few, such as one in Mexico, may show some economic growth but at the cost of the well-being of the majority.
The city of Nogales is divided in half by a fence. While Nogales, Arizona is situated in
…show more content…
How can two areas of essentially the same city have so many discrepancies? Evidently, geography, climate, food, and diseases (in forms of germs) are identical. Some might argue that health care is different; nevertheless, that argument is not relevant to the disease environment. A plausible reason for why the people of the south suffer from more diseases is simply because they lack sanitation and decent health care system, which are determined by man-made institutions.
Could one argue then that the inhabitants of Nogales, Arizona and Nogales, Sonora have different ancestors? No, they do not. After Mexico’s independence from the Spanish Empire in 1821, the area around the two Nogales belonged to the Mexican state of Vieja California (Acemoglu 2012). I maintain that it is the human-made border that serves as the sole explanation for these differences in qualities of lives. Since northern Nogales is in the Unites States, its citizens can obtain the benefits of economic institutions of the United States that allow them to freely choose their career, get skills and schooling, and invest in technology, which results in higher wages and profit. More importantly, they have direct access to political institutions that ensure their participation in democratic processes; consequently, popularly elected officials provide services ranging from law and order to sanitations systems. Citizens of Nogales, Sonora, on the other hand, face a different reality. This leads
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, signed in 1848, officially ended the war between Mexico and the United States. Even though it happened over 168 years ago, its legacy persists, because the treaty redefined the border and the border region. Under the terms of the treaty, Mexicans who suddenly found themselves living in the United States choose either Mexican citizenship, in which case they would have to relocate south of the new border, or to stay where they were and become citizens of the United States. About 80 percent—a total of seventy-five thousand Mexican people—remained in the United States (Passel, 2011). Since then, continuing economic and political difficulties in Mexico, combined with economic opportunities in the United States, have encouraged the flow of migration from Mexico to the United States in large numbers. Today, Mexican Americans are the fastest growing ethnic group in the United States and the estimated Mexican American population in 2000 was 20.6 million people, the largest Mexican population outside of Mexico (Center for Immigration Studies, 2010). Most Mexican Americans entered the United States legally and have become full U.S. citizens, however, the number of illegal immigrants arriving from Mexico has been an alarming and concerning issue in the United States and especially the state of Arizona. Arizona is in a unique geopolitical location in the United States because it shares a 370-mile border with Mexico. Much of the border is open and
The story “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been” by Joyce Carol Oates is very much different from the movie Smooth Talk directed by Joyce Chopra in many ways. The story and film were both made to relate to the real life serial killer Charles Howard Schmid Jr. and his crimes committed, while also reflecting a passage from the Old Testament that states “Whither goest thou? and whence comest thou?” (Judges, 19:17) The three ways that the story and the film are very different are, how Connie’s vainness is portrayed, the importance of the mother daughter relationship, and finally the conclusion of the storyline.
Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Proctor are two main and important women in the Crucible. They are opposite of each other based on their acts we can notice that Elizabeth is a better women, which makes their characters important and vital to the story. Elizabeth Proctor character seems to be the only good thing left in John Proctors life. Elizabeth is an honest woman who would never lie or hides something to John, although John has lied to her. While she is suspicious at times with Abigail, she will never stop loving him.
Summary: • “I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education, and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality, and freedom for their spirits. I still believe we shall overcome.” pg. 189 1. Sissela Bok is a very positive person and Arnett and Arneson would agree with her statement that people shall overcome.
In the Land of Open Graves Jason de León personifies the US-Mexico border crossers who are often dehumanized and reduced to the “undocumented”, and simultaneously explores the interaction between sociopolitical power and hybrid collectif in producing the deterrence that serves the interests of the US government. He elucidates the true objective of the Prevention Through Deterrence Strategy which funneled the border crossers to hostile environments such as the Sonoran Desert of Arizona with the aim to enhance fatal consequences of illegal immigration and discourage people from violating the law. Most interestingly, the policy rests on the “personification of the dessert”, scapegoating nature for increased death rates and “masking the workings
Should the United States enter into military intervention in foreign countries for humanitarian reason? Why? Why not? Under what conditions should the U.S. intervene if at all?
Recognize Nieves? No? Okay, how about Zacatecas? Still not ringing a bell? Okay, okay, Mexico? Yeah, I knew you’d know that one. Nieves, Zacatecas is within the Mexico borders. A humble place where I was born. Several circumstances started evolving where I was raised. And just like any other parents, mine got concerned which later resulted of us relocating to a safer environment. A place where death would visit frequently wasn’t a good place for a 1 year old kid. A town where the word trust was unknown. Leading to my parents decision of following the american dream.
During the late 1700s, Adam Smith and Thomas Malthus each entered their predictions on the future of the world’s economies into the history books. In his writings in An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Smith theorized that national economies could be continuously improved by means of the division of labor, efficient production of goods, and international trade. In An Essay on the Principle of Population, Thomas Malthus predicted that the sustainable production of food in relation to population was vital to the mere existence of national economies in order to ensure an able labor force. Smith believed that the success or
Several historical legislations have contributed to the intensification of structural racism in Arizona towards Latino immigrants that has been carried along to modern days. Most of them originated from past disputes over illegal immigration, which for the most part entail perceptions of illegal immigrants as “criminal aliens”.
The disease environment of a particular area can be shaped by a number of things, some of which are economic, social, and political shifts in the area. During the 19th century as urbanization and industrialization grew economic, social, and political changes occurred. While these major shifts changed the dynamics of cities they also changed the dynamics of disease.
The actions made in today’s societies across the country not only affect those situations immediately at hand, but also those for generations to come. This paper will be delving into immigration reform in Arizona, and more specifically the negative effects that the border surge has had on the socio-economic status of the Grand Canyon state. The motivation for choosing this topic comes from the time spent personally living in Arizona for 12 years and seeing it as one of the most dynamic states having to solve problems for a multitude of issues that arouse within it. The main drive for this paper is the question that asks, what are the socio-economic impacts of the Arizona immigration legislation? This question focusing more on supporting
America is considered one of the leading countries in the world for medical advances. We are leaders in the effort to cure such things such as Cancer, AIDS, HIV, and as of recent Ebola. With such advanced tools, Americans can sleep easier at night. But what about other countries, like Liberia, who has little to no medical training? Don’t they deserve the right to a healthy life too? Many Americans believe that they do which is why we should send more health care professionals to countries struggling to fight deadly diseases.
Probably, one of the most frequently cited de nitions of “borderlands” in this new histori- cal school of thought comes from Gloria Anzaldúa’s 1987 book, Border- lands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza, in which she describes these zones as something more than xed areas on maps: they are places where “people of different races occupy the same territory, where under, lower, middle and upper classes touch, where the space between two individuals shrinks with intimacy” (preface, unnumbered page). Borderlands, in this view, are home to con icting, divergent cultures, as well as people for whom multiple cul- tures could potentially lend order and meaning to the
Over the last 50 years, the world has struggled to maintain an economic balance and stability, while flourishing countries try to maintain a steady income to support its people and relations with other countries. Therefore, when a continent like Africa fails to maintain a stable government and economy, super powers such as America decide to intervene with its relations. Africa has great potential to become another pillar of the world’s economic structure with its mass amounts of uncultivated land. Unfortunately, corruption and irresponsible governments hinder that progress. Foreign aid while helpful should be limited to a yearly amount because it allows the government to repudiate responsibility and gives room for corruption; it creates a
The first paradigm of international relations is the theory of Realism. Realism is focused on ideas of self-interest and the balance of power. Realism is also divided into two categories, classical realism and neo-realism. Famous political theorist, Hans Morgenthau was a classical realist who believed that national interest was based on three elements, balance of power, military force, and self interest (Kleinberg 2010, 32). He uses four levels of analysis to evaluate the power of a state. The first is that power and influence are not always the same thing. Influence means the ability to affect the decision of those who have the power to control outcomes and power is the ability to determine outcomes. An example of influence and power