Essay On Greenhouse Gas Emissions

One of the biggest controversies with livestock production is that the amount of greenhouse gas emissions that get released into the atmosphere. Its assumed that cars produce most if not all the greenhouse gas emissions however livestock has a big say in air pollution. According to Cassandra Brooks, writer for the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, 18 percent of all global greenhouse gas emissions are due to livestock production. This is nearly 20% and can be greatly reduced if people reduced their demand for meat. The Environmental Working Group used a tangible variable for Americans stating “if everyone in the U.S. ate no meat or cheese just one day a week, it would be like not driving 91 billion miles – or taking 7.6 million

It’s often argued that cows are the main source of our Methane emission, giving a strong argument to reduce, or even stop, our consumption of meat. In all actuality, only about six percent to seven percent of all greenhouse

If President Trump follows through his “America Free Energy Plan” promise it will undo a majority of President Obama’s actions to reduce the United States greenhouse gas emissions. Thus having a negative influence on the climate. Another problem that can occur is

In spite of increasing data which points towards the unsustainability of our meat industry, a report called the “Factory Farm Nation,” published by the Food and Water Watch, indicates that the U.S. meat industry has continued to grow over the last decade.

At last, the author raises awareness with the support of specific statistics related to the topic. He claims that ‘507 billion dollar’ worth land will sink if the emission of Co2 remains constant at same pace until 2100. Moreover, Crop yields will decrease dramatically , North Dakota will have problems with ‘declining productivity’, and Arizona will face a ‘one-in –20 odds ‘ that each individual will have to pay 800 more dollars.

Since the beginning of mankind, we have become dependent on animal products as a food source. As population increased, so did the production of animal agriculture and its profitability. Unfortunately, it has grown into an industry that is unsustainable for this planet and is demolishing our environment at an astonishing rate. In the academic article, ‘Cowspiracy’ Strips the Meat Industry Down to the Bone, Ford reports the shocking statistic that “even if all utilities were turned off and every fossil-fuel-guzzling system of transportation ceased immediately, environmental damage that results from greenhouse gases would be irreversible…even with humanity’s greatest efforts, the dairy and meat industries will still eventually destroy life on Earth”. As the environment is at its most crucial and devastating point, the major contribution that animal agriculture has on rainforest deforestation, pollution of our water, and global warming becomes undeniable.

Countries around the world have agreed that to avoid potentially dangerous climate change, global warming stay below 2 degrees C. This means that every country, including Australia will need to significantly increase their efforts to reduce emissions. Currently, Australia’s per capita emissions are among the highest in the world, however, there has been recent progress in decarbonising its economy. For example, greenhouse gas emissions have remained stable while economy size has almost doubled. (Pathways to deep carbonisation).

As counterintuitive as it sounds, Londoners rather buy lamb from New Zealand as from the United Kingdom because raising lamb in the United Kingdom emits a large amount of carbon, and it’s more environmentally friendly to purchase the lamb from an area that is further away, but contains less carbon emission (Source C). When comparing the transportation energy to other factors of the farmers’ market, it is obvious that the amount of energy used for transportation is insignificant compared to the damage the farmers market casts on the environment. Many farmers will use fertilizers to give nutrients to the plants so that it will maximize its growth, but do not consider the long-term effects it has on the

tax dollars to U.N. global warming programs”, as well as revoke the policies that prohibit unwarranted restrictions on drilling technology. By doing these things, it is easy to conclude that the United States does not want to make any action towards preventing global warming. Nevertheless, global warming is a real and traceable thing that important people like you should try to prevent. This can be done by the termination of drilling for oil and mining for coal, by taking one more step towards saving the environment, and therefore ensuring a safe future for generations to come. This earth is ours, and when we drill into it to get those energy sources, we are also ruining the planet. By taking actions such as taxing CO2 and putting money towards repairing the damage done to the environment, we can take one step towards a safer life. More money could go towards creating better technologies that use wind and solar power, that use hybrid cars and make the atmosphere less polluted. Jobs may be lost by moving towards renewable energy sources, but if we continue to use fossil fuels, there will be no future to worry about jobs again, and all will be

However, the Action Plan is not likely to produce 9.8 Mt in new reductions by 2020, as the government stated. For example, the government claimed that using Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account funds to subsidize electricity prices which would produce 3 Mt in emission reductions. We found no evidence to support this claim and concluded that subsidizing electricity rates is not an acceptable use of these funds. Fortunately, the government is no longer proposing to divert Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account funds in this way.

Last month, the United States of America and fellow global powerhouse China reached a deal to incorporate more non-fossil fuel energy into their total energy consumption. Through this deal, greenhouse gas production will be cut by up to 26 percent in America, lowering our levels to somewhere around 28 percent of the levels experienced in 2005 (Samuelson). This plan has been hailed as a great first step, and it is likely that smaller countries will make similar emissions cuts. That being said, China and America currently combine for 42 percent of carbon dioxide emissions worldwide according to the International Energy Agency. The world still heavily relies on fossil fuels for about 80 percent of its energy. In order to solve this problem of moving to renewable resources without causing a global economic collapse, countries need to be prepared to make budget cuts in other areas. Weak agreements have been enacted with dates a few years down the road to change this degenerative process. However, with loose restrictions on the way each country will achieve this goal, the discussions feels, according to Climate Research Program Leader Myles R. Allen, like a lost cause. It simply is not enough. The United States of America should be taking stronger initiatives and setting the standards for the transition towards a greener tomorrow. These initiatives would benefit both the Earth and its inhabitants. To do this, the government should take this more active role, through

The use of fossil fuels has greatly increased the amount of atmospheric and oceanic CO2 to a point where it’s ruining the natural flow of the world; the earth’s temperature is rising. As a result, the polar ice caps are melting causing the seas to rise. With only a 1 meter increase in sea level the United States alone could lose

Wang suggests in his article that the largest impact on our greenhouse gas emissions comes from beef and lamb. He also suggests that the gasses emitted from beef and lamb are “generated through livestock raising

NGS integrates greenhouse into other major policy initiatives, such as the Natural Heritage Trust, and launches new measures to increase greenhouse emission reduction activities across the Australian community. It provides the strategic framework for an effective greenhouse response and for meeting current and future international commitments. It will provide a fresh impetus for action by governments, stakeholder groups and the broader community and set directions for that action into the next century.

Methane is from the digestive of almost all livestock and from manure management. Cows themselves produce 150 billion gallons of methane per day. Methane is 50 times more destructive than carbon dioxide. All the greenhouse gases being emitted causes climate change and with the rate we are going at, by 2050 there will be 80% of emissions into the atmosphere. Manure is also plays a part in pollution and 7 million pounds of it is being produced a day. With feces comes toxic gases like ammonia, 80% of ammonia is produced from feces. The problem with ammonia is that it causes breathing issues. Reducing methane and manure production would have benefits to the Earth almost