Essay On Gun Rights

It is appropriate to own a gun but following the entire legal requirements that are put in place to control the ownership and usage. In a state where everyone owns a firearm, the stability of that nation is likely to collapse .However, if a country controls the legalization of gun ownership, then security will not be a problem. In most of the nations where a large number of people own guns illegally, their stability is always questionable. The economy is still at its lowest, and the citizens are always fighting against one another. All these negative impacts then result in the formation of organizations or otherwise some militia groups that will ever want to be against the government. (Cerrone, 1999)

The right to possess guns is a fundamental element to American identity. The right to own and operate guns under certain circumstances is in fact guaranteed as part of the United States Constitution. Over the course of American history and particularly in the 21st century, there exists a great debate over the possession of guns of private citizens. Both sides of the debate argue with fervor. There are those that argue fervently for the right to possess arms; they argue for guns with regard to home protection, property protection, personal security, and that it is a fundamental right as a citizen.

Some States have enacted their own laws. Florida has allowed its citizens to carry a concealed weapon. Since this law was enacted the murder rate has dropped by 29%. Over the same period of time the nationwide murder rate increased by 11%. This clearly shows that guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens can prevent crime.

The role guns play in our society has long been debated on whether or not citizens have the right to own guns. There are those who believe that guns have no role in the hands of private citizens. Whereas there are those who believe that guns are the very foundation that protects our rights and liberties expressed in the Constitution. The debate is over whether or not there should be stricter laws preventing people to own guns. Though gun control and gun rights advocates share similar views on background checks and requirements, each have different views on the safety of guns and the Second Amendment meaning.

I believe everyone should have the right to be able to keep a gun on them if they choose. If the government puts laws on guns, it's likely that less people will have a chance at protecting themselves. Also these gun laws will not prevent people from having illegal guns. Many criminals use illegal weapons so the guns can't be traced back to them. Few people

I am a firm believer in one being able to protect themselves. As American citizens, we should have the right and freedom to choose bear arms as a form of self defense. I do believe that this right needs to be taken very seriously and responsibly. Enforcing the laws we have now on gun control will help to keep others safe and make it harder for criminals to obtain a weapon. Before the government decides to uphold the strict interpretation of the Second Amendment, they should take everything into account, including the freedom

Employees do have the moral right to park their cars with guns in them as long as they are locked and out of the sight of someone walking by the vehicle to get in to the building. Some employees are leaving late and in the dark to an empty or secluded lot. I can understand the employers concern as well in that people often leave work mad or stressed and this could aggravate a possible assault.

The 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, outlining the right for any citizens to bear arms, is considered a cornerstone of our culture, but given how weapons have advanced so much since the amendment was drafted, is the “right to bear arms” truly ethical? In the past several decades, the United States has witnessed an unprecedented number of mass shootings (372 in 2015 alone), increasing in deadliness as citizens gain access to more advanced tech. Despite the frequency of these shootings and the number of victims killed, there has been little effective action taken to curtail these shootings in the United States. While liberals argue that the solution is strict gun regulation, conservatives claim that it infringes on the rights guaranteed by the 2nd amendment. Effectively, we’re forced to ask whether our right to own weapons is ethical in light of these tragedies where many innocent lives are lost. In good faith, I will argue in favor of the liberal argument of strict gun laws.

Today it is not necessary for each individual to own a gun. Yes, everyone has a right to own a gun and bear arms. With the various law enforcement

There are not any laws that can take away your right to openly carry your firearm in any place that exists on a federal or state level. But there are ways in that a state can use the prohibition of firearms. In fact there are already laws in states that prevent the open carry of firearms in public places. Laws surrounding open carry are in California

Supporters beg to differ by explaining that it is effective because it helps make the workplace less violent and safer. According an online scholar journal, The Employer's Conundrum of Firearms & Parking Lots, written by Texas State University professors Dr. Sanders, Dr. Pattison, and Dr. John K. Ross, III, the promoters thinks that the bill pushes for an individual’s safety and protection when going to and from work (Sanders). It gives the employee’s a sense of security. The loaded guns that it in their car could be first thing that comes to an individual’s mind in an unpredictable situation that can happen to anyone at any time even at work. Advocates of the bill may also add it is effective because it gives an individual’s their rights to self-defend themselves. In numerous state like Oklahoma are passing “Self-Defense Act” to prohibit employers from enforcing any restriction and regulation against workers from storing guns or in their car that is located at an individual job’s site because they have their right to do so (Sanders). Clearly, the advocates for this Guns in the Parking lot bill think the law is effective since it is safest and ethical to allow employees to have guns in their car at their

No, I do not have a moral right keep a gun in my car regardless to the Second Amendment or state law gives me the right to keep a gun in my car. Although having a gun in your car is your legal right, the company policy may state it is prohibited. The

Gun control has been an ongoing issue in the American way of life, even though gun ownership is a constitutional right of the American people. The issue dates back prior to the drafting of the United States Constitution. According to Thomas Jefferson, “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms, only disarm those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicide, for an unarmed man to be attacked with greater confidence that an armed man. Although weapon ownership has been a dated issue; it is still a controversial issue argued today in society. Despite recent gun violence incidents, I think there are more important reasons why gun ownership should not be banned.

Over the centuries, the Supreme Court has always ruled that the 2nd Amendment protects the states' militia's rights to bear arms, and that this protection does not extend to individuals. In fact, legal scholars consider the issue "settled law." For this reason, the gun lobby does not fight for its perceived constitutional right to keep and bear arms before the Supreme Court, but in Congress. Interestingly, even interpreting an individual right in the 2nd Amendment presents the gun lobby with some thorny problems, like the right to keep and bear nuclear weapons.

Even though there has been conflict over this issue for years, owning a gun is indeed one of the rights of the people to have. People should be able to protect themselves against people that have the intention of hurting you. So having a gun is good for safety. But on the other hand it can be used against you because most gun accidents happen inside the home due to misuse or a kid having a grab at it. There should be