Essay On Health Care

Health care is an essential service needed by citizens. As a result, the government plays an important role by designing an appropriate health care system for its citizens. In this paper, a comparison between the health care system in the U.S. and Canada has been made. Using various literary sources, the comparison has been done considering the four components of health care services delivery; financing, insurance, delivery, and payment. The findings indicate that the health care system in the U.S. is expensive but more efficient than the single-payer health care system in Canada.

In this paper, there will be a comparative analysis to the United States (U.S.) healthcare system and Canadians healthcare system highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of both.

In recent years, health care reform has been a heated debate topic throughout the U.S. On March 23, 2010, the Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare,” was signed into law(Health Care). During this same time period, the health care system just north of us, in Canada, has been renowned as the ideal system. The two systems can be compared by looking at the major features of each: provision of care, funding of coverage, and availability of coverage.

It will be realized that the Obama healthcare system happens to be large step within the health reform throughout the United States, a decision to improve it will be very crucial. Just like the other key reforms witnessed during the past, the Obama healthcare system is focused on embedding the system’s private nature, and hence provide national health insurance. Despite the various pros as well as cons, regarding the Canadian Medicare, it is often considered necessary because it is works for a large fraction of the individuals and tends to have enough improvement

ca is able to find a political will to provide universal healthcare coverage, the rest of the world can then show the way. This says to me that the United States must look within itself and make the moral determination as to whether healthcare should be considered a fundamental right granted to all its citizens as a theme of this book. Once addressed, the United States can join the other industrialized countries who have long since implemented universal healthcare systems such as Germany, France, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, Canada who have more cost effective systems which produce better health outcomes than the US.1

Canada’s health care system “can be described as a publicly-funded, privately-provided, universal, comprehensive, affordable, single-payer, provincially administered national health care system” (Bernard, 1992, p.103). Health care in Canada is provincial responsibility, with the Canada Health act being a federal legislation (Bernard, 1992, p. 102). Federal budget cuts, has caused various problems within Medicare such as increased waiting times and lack of new technology. Another problem with Medicare is that The Canada Heath Act does not cover expenditures for prescriptions drugs. All these issue has caused individuals to suggest making Medicare privatized. Although, Canada’s health care system consists of shortcomings, our universal

Canada’s national healthcare system was implemented in 1957 by Paul Strand and continues to be one of the defining features of the country itself. Also known as Medicare, Canada’s healthcare system is a group of socialized universal health insurance programs that were introduced by legislations passed in 1957, 1966 and 1984. (Canadian Museum of History). This idea of a publicly funded and administered, comprehensive, accessible medical service insurance plan has a far more complex history than the politics of creating a program for cost sharing between the federal and provincial governments. Medicare is truly a delicate balance between societal expectations, medical advancements, available technology, economic and human resources, and ultimately,

The implementation of universal health care in one province of Canada had led to the evolution of health care in Canada as a whole country. Beginning in Saskatchewan with the help of the Co-Operative Commonwealth Federation in coalition with the New Democratic Party holding control in the province of Sasakachwan and acquiring great influence through the support of labour workers in other provinces they were able to pressure the government towards reform and grasp the attention of the working class (Maioni, 1997, p.415). The joining of an organization like the CCF and the political party of NDP created great influence that led to the formation of universal health care by means of a third party. As opposed to the United States who were unable

The foundation of Canada’s universal health care system was laid during the Great Depression, when national health insurance was initially proposed; it was refined when bills were passed during World War II to implement national insurance and finally found fruition when Saskatchewan first covered health care expenses for its entire population in 1947 (LeBien, 1996). This recognition that the social need for health care services and coverage was more important than any potential profits that could be made from providing such services led to the Federal government to begin work on a national plan (Armstrong, et al., 2000, p. 12). By 1961, the entire country had comprehensive insurance that covered all essential medical services. The Canada Health Act was enacted in 1984, and all of Canada was mandated to provide medical coverage based on universality, portability between provinces, comprehensive coverage, public administration and accessibility (Joudrey & Robson, 2010, p. 530). Canada did not assume full control of costs for providing the implemented coverage; rather they provided 50% funding, thus matching provincial costs (LeBien, 1996). Concerns around rising medical costs due to an aging population in the late 1980’s, led the government to commission a policy review by two economists, Drs. Barer and Stoddart (Beck & Thompson, 2006). The Barer-Stoddart report stated that“…provinces should review

The divide between Canada and the United States transcend into healthcare as well. Markedly, the United States and Canada differ in policy. Canadians place concentration on making decisions for the common good; for the people. Americans focus on making decisions for the rights of the individual. To explain, “the United States pushes the cost of healthcare while other institutions hold down funds to pay for healthcare” (Barr 52). To put it another way, Canada spends less on healthcare than the United States. In fact, the Canada and the United States physicians practice medicine differently, therefore the costs of healthcare differ. Comparatively, “Canada spends 10

Canada: An Evaluation of Health Policy Canada remains the country of constant comparison when it comes to health care in the United States. Their ability to manage and execute a universal healthcare program proves that this coverage is possible with a large population. However, it took many years for Canada to perfect the process and there are still shortfalls within the industry.

As early as 1919, Canada’s Liberal party promised national health insurance, but the first real step was taken in Saskatchewan, where in 1947 province wide hospital insurance was introduced. A national hospital-insurance act followed in 1958, and by 1960, 99% of Canadians were covered by government run hospital insurance. Saskatchewan was again the first in 1961 to introduce medical-care insurance which covered doctors’ services as well. However, this was not an easy transformation. In 1962 when the medical insurance act was implemented, the doctors of Saskatchewan went on strike. As a part of the settlement the government agreed to a modified plan that addressed some of the doctors’ grievances. Despite the opposition from provinces, doctors and insurance companies, national Medicare legislation was in place by 1967, and today health care is a constitutional right.

In Canada, often times public versus private healthcare is a prevalent debate among citizens. Canada’s public health care system was implemented in the years surrounding the 1950s, this healthcare system named Medicare. This healthcare system here in Canada is one that all Canadians take great dignity in, and it states that “all insured persons have access to medically necessary hospital and physical services on a prepaid basis”; where “insured person” is defined as “a person lawfully entitled to be or to remain in Canada who makes his home and is ordinarily present in the province, but does not include a tourist, a transit or a visitor to the province”. In this essay, I will analyze whether it would be of greater benefit for Canada to maintain

Healthcare costs represent a high offer of Gross Domestic Product in the United States, with respect to Canada. In 2013, U.S. social insurance spending served 17.1 for every penny of GDP, versus only 10.7 for every penny in Canada, as indicated by an October 2015 report from the Commonwealth Fund (Karen E. Lasser; David U., 2014). Pundits of U.S. social insurance burning through frequently finish up this is unnecessary, forcing a delay American flourishing. It's one motivation behind why legislators, for example, Democratic presidential competitor Bernie Sanders (from the fringe province of Vermont) support Canadian-style, single-payer therapeutic services (Karen E. Lasser; David U., 2014).

The evolution of healthcare system in Canada have been made over the past four decades