Essay On Homeowners Not Being Able To Defend Their Property

Studies have demonstrated, repeatedly, that homes with a firearm are no safer than those without guns. In fact, the sight of a gun during an intrusion is cause for action, deterring thought, which could make all the difference between life and unnecessary death. Besides which, most gun murders at home aren 't perpetrated by an intruder, but rather by a family member or an acquaintance.

Dr. Jeffrey A. Roth states that “research has shown that a gun kept in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household, or friend, than an intruder. The use of a firearm to resist a violent assault actually increases the victim's risk of injury and death.”

The topic of home defense and the extent of force a homeowner is allowed to use depends on the state one resides in as well as the state’s laws on home defense. In many states, like the state of New Jersey, there is what is known as, “Duty to Retreat” laws. These states are predominantly located in the north and do not allow the homeowner to take much action against an intruder. The “Duty to Retreat” is a duty of which citizens of a particular state are required by law to first look for a path of retreat before confronting the intruder. If the path of retreat does not present itself, the home owner can then take action. This “action” however, does not allow the homeowner to forcibly engage with the intruder. The intruder must first show signs of aggression towards the homeowner or their family. In the event that the intruder does show signs of aggression, the homeowner is only allowed to counter with equal force. For example, if the intruder only has their hands to fight the homeowner, the homeowner cannot draw a firearm and discharge at the intruder. This is the mentality of many states across the nation when it comes to defending one’s self or personal property. However, the other half of the states in the United States employ different tactics, which allow the homeowner to stand their ground against an intruder. These states are predominantly located in the south, with the exception of three northern states: Alaska, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania. Within these states, a

I would describe my own personal land ethic simply with my personal definitions of both terms. My personal definition of land is a substance in which animals and humans utilize by physically walking on. My personal definition of ethics is something (idea or belief) someone holds close to their heart and is willing to protect completely. When combining both personal definitions of land and ethic, I define land ethic as viewing land with the utmost respect, feeling passionate and taking action toward sustaining or benefiting the lands natural state. When comparing my definition of land ethic to Aldo Leopold’s definition, it is evident to see that we are both thinking similarly. When defining the land, Leopold includes soils, waters, plants and

Because of this, people are more scared of what will happen to them. This causes them to question the security of their safety. According to Wayne LaPierre, “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun” (Shermer). What if, though, those good people go bad? The fact is that gun-owners have little to no training experience at all. Not only are criminals a risk, but having guns in a person’s home also increase the risk of suicides, homicides, and other fatal and nonfatal accidents. As of 2010, 31,672 people were killed due to gun-shot wounds and another 73,505 were treated. Of these, the majority was homicides and 61 percent were suicides. Also another risk of owning guns is the event of fight between a couple. If a fight were to occur, a gun being present in the house could escalate things quickly. Studies have shown, 54% of intimate partners have been shot by guns. 1,082 women and 267 men killed in 2010 because of this. (Shermer). This proves that with guns present in a house hold, the risk of someone getting hurt increases. As of 2013, gun related accidents were reported to be higher than car accidents. This included all gun related incidents, from suicides to homicides and everything in between. In contrast to this, the death tolls of accidents caused by motor vehicle accidents have declined while those caused by guns have escalated higher than

From the very beginning, it is extraordinarily easy to step into the mind of the main character and narrator Manon Guadet and how the world she lives in becomes an eerie reality. Deeper throughout the novel, there are many themes presented through Manon’s eyes. Through the use of many paradoxes, the themes of racism, gender oppression and marriage in Property, by Valerie Martin is ultimately connected with the institution of slavery in America. The aristocratic life of the early 19th century is defined in the use of these themes through the pictures they create. Not only do the themes cause the novel to

From a personal protection angle, people own guns for self-defense, is impractical and glamorized. There is no reason for a person who lives in

homes are no conceivable reason to own an AR-15, a pump action shotgun, armor-piercing bullets or a high-capacity magazine. Opponents argue that gun control does not reduce gun-related injuries, murder, or suicide, and some argue that certain regulations violate individual liberties. If your fellow citizens have easy access to guns, they’re more likely to kill you than if they don’t have access. In the United States, firearms are used in

The presence of a gun has been proven to have a negative impact, research published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that living in a household where a gun is kept increased the risk of the homicide by between 15% and 170%. This is appears to be an inescapable statistic of gun ownership, but lowering this is a possibility through proper gun

With a corrupt housing assistance not only comes the families who refuse to work because of their children, but come the people who have a steady income who keep it hush-hush so they can receive benefits from the government. Personally working at a real estate company I've met quite a few people who are abusing our housing assistance. People who resume working and benefitting from the government assistance is a mockery of what our country should stand for. These people opt themselves out of paying taxes or taking any responsibility for what they must provide for their own families. They use the government assistance simply because of greed. The more money for them the better, they do not care that there are people being rejected the same benefits who actually need it. This is

A couple years back. My house was hit by a tornado. After the tornado hit there were a lot of break-ins the police said that if you see anyone in your house you can defend yourself and your property. I agree with this because of the fact that being in the situation of losing most of your house that them stealing from us was terrible. If someone came in my house I would

Although, when people think of self defense they tend to think that means killing someone if they were to break into their home, but the castle doctrine specifies that, a person may not use deadly force upon another person unless: he or she reasonably believes that such deadly force is necessary to protect himself or herself or another against death, serious physical injury, rape, sodomy or kidnapping or serious physical injury through robbery, burglary or arson or any forcible felony (Senate). You may use excessive force if a person who illegally enters, remains after illegally entering, or attempts to illegally enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle legally occupied by such person. A resident does not have to retreat from his or her home or vehicle when a burglar is breaking and entering.

You know you want to protect your home with an security system, you are just not sure how. You know you need an alarm system and perhaps a camera or two, but you have no idea how to go about getting what you need. Though there are some people who can install their own home systems, most have to rely on home security companies for help and monitoring services. You can set your own alarm, but without someone to let you know it is going off, you just have to hope it'll scare someone away. Luckily, having a watchful eye 24 hours a day is not as expensive as you may imagine.

The ideology behind what private property represents and conveys through the theories of both Locke and Marx's results in contrasting views. Locke heavily stresses the blending of labor and common land to create private property to increase one’s wealth. Liberty and livelihood under Locke’s theory is tied to the ability of an individual to control the use of their private property. Marx’s theory strongly contends that the bourgeoisie has gained control of the profit making private properties leaving the working class in a stage of exploitation. Marx’s conclusion then is to set private property in the hands of the people in hopes of creating universal economic equality. Respectively each thesis places governments, labour and religion

The United States of America was built on the ideals set forth by our founding fathers in the Constitution of the United States of America. Such ideals are held to the highest standards in our community to this day; like our right to the freedom of speech, our right to bear arms, and the right to own property. Each of these rights are firmly stated in the Constitution, along with many other rights that citizens of the Untied States have. The ideals of our founding fathers were so profound that many other nations modeled their democracy after the Constitution put forth by the Americans. It is basic human rights that people should have the freedom of speech, religion, and press and the right to own property. And we