Essay On Kerkoff And Davis Filter Theory

Relationships are basically, what makes the world go round. All provide a sense of personal fulfillment, whether it'd be positive or negative. A good example are companies. Companies make strong relationships with their customers, in turn, customers spend more money buying their wares. Another example is the relationship between parents and children. Two texts that focus on these relationships are; “Only Daughter” by Sandra Cisneros and “Mother Tongue” by Amy Tan. The texts heavily revolve around the familial connection between a parent and a daughter. Actually, it s so emphasized on that connection, you might say to yourself,”Why is this so important?” It's important because connections go hand in hand with personal fulfillment. Explanations

3.1 Process involved in the development, maintenance and breakdown of relationships – development - Reward/need satisfaction model direct reinforcement may encourage the formation of a relationship between individuals. Operant conditioning could occur where an individual is positively reinforced with the potential partner offering pleasant stimulus such as smiling. Additionally social needs may be provided for by this potential partner such as friendship and sex, furthering the likelihood of a relationship developing. Alternatively negative reinforcement may be involved where a negative stimulus is removed by the potential partner e.g. If a woman helps a man through a troubled time in his life he may find her more attractive as she has helped to alleviate his negative stimuli. Liking through association – Classical conditioning The potential partner may be associated with pleasant circumstances. If someone was to meet another individual while they are in a good mood, they may then associate such individual with the positive mood, finding them more

Another theory is the Filter Model proposed by Kerchoff and Davis; they say that relationships develop through three ‘filters’. It starts with the ‘field of availables’ which are people available for a relationship where we then filter out different partners for different reasons, so it narrows down to a ‘field of desirables’ who are the people we consider as a potential partner. The first filter involves the social model where we choose people without being aware by where they live, work, have been educated or their social class. With individual characteristics not being important at this point. Then there is similarity of attitudes and values, where a partner’s beliefs and ideas come into effect. This is where communication is easier and the relationship can progress, however if beliefs and views are very different then the relationship may not move from its current position. The final filter is the emotional needs, which is whether the people fit as a couple and can meet each other’s needs.

Relationships are extremely important as Ray bradbury said in Fahrenheit 451 because the people in that relationship can change their perspectives for the better. When Montag

Furthermore, in 2007 a research was administered by Kathleen Gerson, writer of the American Prospect, based on the question of unsuccessful relationships as a result of poor nurturing through their childhood. She states that “young workers today grew up in rapidly changing times: They watched women march into the workplace and adults develop a wide range of alternatives to traditional marriage.” In other words, Gerson is explaining that due to the change in families, many children can administer a misconception of what relationships are composed of, concluding why their relationships are different than previous generations. This generation grew up in a completely different aspect when women’s rights were already given and male dominance was slowly vanishing. However, since this was a social time change for many, gender roles in the relationships differentiated between families, some decided to remain in traditional-like relationships, while others went to have their own directed relationships but because divorce was no longer unacceptable, many ended in divorce. Having parents as idols and creating their own perspective on relationships, children learned a lot from simple observations. For example as children grow up living with parents in an unhealthy relationship, as they reach a stage to date, they will initiate that all relationships are similar and will believe that-that is the correct way to behave in their own relationship since it’s what they were accustomed to. This

Hazan and Shaver (1987) aimed to investigate whether they could classify the responders’ love relationships as secure, ambivalent, and avoidant, whether there was a correlation between the formed attachment pattern from childhood and attachment pattern during the love relationships, and whether there was a correlation between the distribution of childhood attachment patterns and adult love relationships’ attachment patterns.

According to Gordon (1976), "It is clear to the teenager that he or she should have a date after school, and it is clear to the average man or woman that he should have a mate, family, a circle of friends." Cultural expectations for social relationships change with age. For instance, while it is appropriate for young children to have their primary emotional attachment to their parents, young adults are expected to develop new attachments to dating partners and later to a spouse. Therefore, Daniel Perlman and Letitia Anne Peplau stated that when a person's social relationships do not keep pace with age-related changes in normative standards for relationships, he or she is likely to feel

When you spend two hours with the same group of people every week for a long period of time you are going to form relationships with them. This

These theories insist that human relationships are made and sustained by evaluating the costs and benefits of entering a relationship, and by comparing them to alternative options. Specifically, I chose the first and second most common principles of this theory in order to analyze my turning points. The first principle is the notion that relationships are initiated out of self-interest. So for example, if a person believes that the relationship could prove beneficial towards personally achieving something, they will be more inclined to pursue that relationship even if it is outside their conscious awareness. The second principle is the notion that rewards and costs are positive and negative outcomes associated with a variety of exchanged resources.

Relationships are about two people who want the same thing. In Gray’s Anatomy there are many different friendships, relationships and theories. With different kinds of friendships, sometimes you can’t tell what is real. Association is when you’re friends just because you work together. Sometimes people confuse love with lust. Ludus is when a relationship is just for fun, nothing more. Sometimes being in a relationship with people you love doesn’t always go the exact way you want. “Relationship Rules Theory” is help together by rules and by following them. Being equal in a relationship is huge matter. “Equal Theory” is when some relationships work and some don’t. It takes two dedicated people to succeed at friendships and relationships.

The five factors that predict interpersonal relationships are: proximity, familiarity, similarity, physical appearance, and reciprocity. Proximity refers to the geographical location of persons. People are more likely to initiate, engage, or maintain relationships if someone’s geographical location is near or convenient to the person they are to pursue. Relationships, whether romantic or platonic, are not as likely to be initiated if the proximity does not allow individuals to cross paths or maintain a certain level of communication. As well, familiarity plays an important role in the fostering of relationships. People are said to have an increased attraction and fondness for individuals that they see more often than those they do not. In lay terms, similarity can be summed up by saying that people enjoy the presence of those like (or similar) to them. Individuals are more often drawn to and feel less intimidated by others that share their culture and belief systems; thus, are more likely to form relationships with them. Next, is physical attractiveness; which can be defined in two different ways. First off, people tend to believe that beautiful things equal good things and are more likely to seek out relationships with individuals they find beautiful. However, people are also likely to form relationships with people they believe to be on

Popular beliefs attribute value on relationships in order to make sense of the world and each

In addition, the relational theory emphasize further that the four models are sufficient enough to generate the very high diversity in social relationships observed in practice based on the following two reasons. First, actors’ relationship behavior/disposition may be different if found in different domain of their relationship, and it outcomes variety across relationships (Fiske & Haslam, 2005; Fiske, 2012; Bridoux & Stoelhorst, 2016). Second, the cultural context (i.e., organizational, ethnic national, etc.), ascertain the precise implementation rules of the relational models. In other words, when, how, and with whom to implement each relational model ( e.g,. in order to operate EM, actors must have a shared understanding of the exact proper interval between receiving and giving in return; Bridoux & Stoelhorst,

From the moment we start school, we enter a world where social skills are important and friendships begin to form. Initially, we “make friends” with kids that sit near us in class, or ride the same bus. But, as we age the connection to others depends more on common interests than on geography. This is certainly true as we form friendships as teens and young adults, and even more so as we start searching for a life partner. But even when the stars align and it seems as though you have found your “soulmate”, there can be questions. With the divorce rate on the rise, many couples are left wondering if the choice they made so many years ago was correct.

To explain human relationships further, the social exchange theory can be another definite explanation to help distinguish how we feel to be with other people and how one perceives to be with them, either to rekindle their relationship or to question the decisions that make to be in a relationship (Kelley 1959). The social exchange theory can be defined as a term that allows behaviour to be exchanged to allow a relationship between two people to happen (Huston et al., 2013). An individual social life involves interactions between two people which can be viewed as social exchanges in terms of costs and benefits (Nakagawa et al., 2013). By taking the view of human relationships the social exchange theory argues that individuals engage in a cost benefit analysis which forms their relationship with others (Milkie et al., 2004). When the costs and benefits are equal in a relationship, it is defined as equitable (Siddiqui 2008). Moreover, romantic relationships may be difficult for some people as it involves interpersonal skills in order to make them mutually satisfying therefore requires constant maintenance. Recently, Psychologists have begun to look at the breakdown of relationships and the characteristics which requires them to fail. The breakdown of relationship is a theory which explains the failure of certain human relationships and the factors that may be involved such as lack