Essay On Locavore Movement

Locavorism has both strong supporters and vehement opposers, as most trends do. Overall, eating locally isn’t a bad idea: it can connect you with community farmers and help you to choose healthier meals. However — as with all topics — it isn’t all black and white. Many common locavorism arguments aren’t grounded in science, and people exalt it while blindly ignoring the aforementioned issues. People considering locavorism should ensure that they consider the negatives before beginning a locavore

Saving the planet is a topic that is taken seriously by a huge part of this planet’s population. James McWilliams argument, “The Locavore Myth: Why Buying from Nearby Farmer Won’t Save the Planet,” explains why people need to buy food from people other than the local farmers. He believes that the focus of the locavore movement on transportation is wrong because the real problem lies within the energy-hogging factors in food production. McWilliams also went on to explain that another mistake that the locavore movement made was how food miles were calculated. He believes that a truck with 2,000 apples driving 2,000 miles would consume the same amount of fuel as a truck that carried 50 apples to a local shop only 50 miles away. James McWilliams states that “The critical measure here is not food miles but apples per gallon.” He also argues that taking meat out of a person’s diet would cut down on the carbon footprint of his or her dinner because it takes less energy to bring plants, rather than meat, to the table.

Finally, in the book The End of Food, by Paul Roberts, the author displays the impracticality of the local food movement. When discussing how much of a poor fit a locavore food system is in the modern United States, Roberts states “...in the United States, 80 percent of us live in large, densely populated urban areas, usually on the coast, and typically hundreds of miles, often thousands of miles, from the major centers of food production”. This exhibits how eating locally would be a

Many people are not sure whether the locavore movement is the right route to take, however, Americans are not aware of the positive things it brings to its community. The taste and quality of their produce will improve, along with nutritional factors. Making

The book called The Omnivore’s Dilemma by Michael Pollan talks about 4 different food chains and their pros and cons. The Local sustainable farms let the animals roam free and feed them what the animals are supposed to eat. The food from the local sustainable farms are all natural with no pesticides or artificial fertilizer etc. The local sustainable food chain has the potential to feed all the people of America because it’s healthier for the consumer, animals eat what they are supposed to, and it’s healthier for the environment.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011 Consumer Expenditure Survey, each year millions of americans visit grocery stores, spending an average of $8,315, buying food to feed themselves and their families. However, how many of these americans stop to think of the where this food came from, how it was produced, or the impact that this food has on our environment? On Buying Local, is a persuasive essay written by Kathrine Spriggs, that explores some of these questions, and addresses many points of interest regarding the ideas and benefits of buying locally produced food.

The local sustainable food chain is a great deal better for the environment than any of the other food chains. It is way better than the other food chains because the farmers that

In order to change the way the United States food system is operating at the moment, a change needs to be made in the education that people are receiving about the way their food is produced, manufactured, distributed and consumed. The U.S. food system has become increasingly reliant on mass production factories and multinational retail corporations while local farms and family owned food markets diminish. Economies of scale and opportunity costs represent barriers to change of the current food system because of the many different paths available, each creating different outcomes for consumers, sellers, large corporations and small farms, determining their profit, prices, capital and value. Educating the American people about the benefits of local food production and the downsides of large scale food production, such as nutritional value, disease and safety concerns, and economic advantages, will help to move our food system from “point A” to “point B”.

One of the most troubling issues that is concerning our country is the amount of people living with type 2 diabetes and obesity because of food deserts. Food deserts are affecting the lives of older generation and could follow into the next generation if nothing is done to eliminate the harmful consequences of food deserts in the United States. A complete wipe out of food deserts will not be an easy process, it will years to change the eating habits for lower-income communities. It is less of a challenge to just put a supermarket in a community that needs it, but changing poor nutrition is not as easy. To dispose of food deserts, there are several ways to take action within rural communities. Since fresh fruits and vegetables are troublesome

Did you know that one in every four childen in the United States is obese? But by buying and eating locally grown you can hopefully prevent yourself from getting obese. In the novel, Omnivore’s Dilemma: The Secrets Behind What You Eat, written by Michael Pollan, he talks about four food chains- industrial, industrial organic, local sustainable, and the hunter-gatherer food chain. In the Industrial food chain, people would grow their genetically modified crops on a monoculture farm and they would spray artificial fertilizer, pesticides, and other harmful chemicals on the plants. When growing organic foods on a monoculture farm in the industrial organic food chain, people would using natural fertilizer and would not use pesticides, antibiotics,

Let’s be honest, who actually wants to live in a locavore community? You can receive fresh fruits including enough nutrients from your local grocery store or farmers market. Source B states, “ fresher foods that are grown on high quality soil are going to have more nutrients. But people are not nutrient-deprived. We’re just not nutrient deprived.” Just think about it. There will be absolutely no sweet snacks

I picked up a sweet, fresh, bright red apple at the farmer's market. The tangy smell of the apple makes me hungry, knowing I’m getting the freshest and most nutritious apple. Though is it really any different from the apple grown 300 miles away? The locavores are people who decided to eat locally grown produce, this has become known as the locavore movement and is quickly becoming widespread among more people. But, is a locavore movement really needed? The fact is, there is no difference between local produce and produce that was grown hundreds of miles away. The locavore movement may not make a huge difference.

The United States overall health is notably unfixed, especially among different populations and neighborhoods. Those who remain to be the most heavily impacted by health disparities include those who are of low socioeconomic status or are poor. A very well known, yet inadequately addressed environmental health disparity is the unequal access to healthy foods and grocery stores in poverty areas across the U.S. This includes the deprivation of resources in low-income populations. Many low-income communities are surrounded by fast food restaurants, convenience and liquor stores. These communities see very few grocery stores and healthy food vendors in their community. The basic problem is that this unequal access to healthy foods and grocery stores create environmental challenges to make healthy dietary choices and maintain a healthy body weight. This overall problem can be referred to as “food deserts” which was first used

Locally grown produce is guaranteed to preserve fresh produce and maximum nutritional values, however, on the other hand, Americans are not “nutrient-deprived” (B). Professor Marion Nestle, also a former chair of nutrition, assures that a 100-mile diet is “almost certainly more nutritious than what the average American [is] eating. That doesn’t mean it is necessary to eat

Society must educate itself on what type of food is healthy such as fresh or fresh frozen vegetables, lean meats, whole grains and fruits. Parents should take the time to explain what these are and why they are important, educating themselves if necessary. Families can also extend this education to a hands-on experience but starting a small vegetable garden which produces some of the vegetables they eat. Author and farmer, Sharon Astyk, and sustainable systems land planner, Aaron Newton, argue that people need to take back the control of the food selection and prices by growing their own or purchasing directly from local farmers. In their article, “The Rich Get Richer: the Poor Go Hungry”, Astyk and Newton (2015) write, “When we grow our own food, or buy it directly from local farmers, we take power away from multinationals” (p.518). I agree that society should become more involved and self-sustaining pertaining to food to retain independence from companies that are loyal to shareholders. This education will provide the current and future generations necessary resources to make improved food choices, thereby reducing the obesity and diabetes epidemics gripping our nation.