Fracking: The Role Of Climate Change In New Zealand

There are many similarities and differences between the United States (U.S.) and New Zealand that make them unique. The U.S. has people from all around the world Including people from New Zealand. There is an abundance of jobs and opportunities for people who live there. They have freedom and liberty. This gives them rights that citizens of many other countries don’t have. They also have the right to vote for laws as well as political figures they want in office. Although the U.S. has some amazing qualities, New Zealand has many of the same Ideals, as well as several differences, but regardless both countries are amazing places.

New Zealand is located in Oceania. It consists of islands in the South Pacific Ocean, southeast of Australia. The total area of this country is about 267,710 sq km. The nationality of the citizen is New Zealander. The population of New Zealand is about 4,438,393 people. The language used include English, Maori, Samoan, Hindi, French, Northern Chinese, and Yue. The religions available in New Zealand include Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Maori Christian, Islam and

My Take – The writer here does try to show just how ecofriendly fracking is, and to an extent even I’m convinced by his views. But the writer quotes a private energy company Andarko who takes care in conserving wildlife which can’t be taken at face value as such companies have quite a few environmental violations against them. Over and above I’m agreement with the writer’s views.

Over 50% of New Zealand’s population agree to changing their national flag. New Zealand have already created website, petitions and competitions based on getting a new flag. Australia is recognised by the national flag, unlike New Zealand which is recognised by a silver fern. If any country is too change their flag, it is a wise decision for New Zealand too.

Australia is diverse it has people from Lebanon, Italy and Greece. New Zeland on the other hand is a very religious country. The people that live there are mainly from Pacific Islands but have recently been getting immigrants from different parts of Asia. There are long spanning droughts in Australia, New Zealand has droughts that only last for a short period of time. The population is way greater than the one of New

Fracking takes place primarily in rural agricultural areas and many farmers have leased their land to the oil and gas industry. Examples of fracking 's negative impact on the food chain and water system are emerging. Water contamination from toxic chemicals has sickened and killed livestock. Accidents and spills contaminate crop land throughout the country. "These incidents could affect consumer confidence in the food produced in these areas." According to leading hydraulic fracturing expert Danny Reible. Furthermore the large quantities of water required for fracking poses a future challenge to agriculture and the process may contribut to global climate change which may strain freshwater resources even further.

Fracking, does it have more consequence or benefits? Well first let me explain what fracking is. Fracking is formally known as (Hydraulic Fracturing), an exceedingly confrontational procedure commonly used today to extort oil and natural gas from the earth. Many exponents of fracking congratulate the encouraging economic impacts and job creations. But they fail to recognize the effects fracking have on the climate and societies across America.

It is believed this is leading to water price increases as well (Loki (2015)). Air pollution is also occurring in several communities near where fracking is going on (Loki (2015)). They are experiencing 39% increase in radon concentration (Loki (2015)). This also causes a concern for babies because they are susceptible to what they breath in from the surrounding air (Loki (2015)). Many scientists believe that the fracking process also can be linked to earthquakes due to the loosening of the soil and the injection of the wastewater into the soil (Loki (2015)). The release of the methane also causes a heat increase because of the additional greenhouse gases (Loki (2015)). These are just a few of the main concerns with fracking and how it affects the environment.

Intergenerational equity and sustainable development require humans as a whole to understand the dire consequences of natural gas and oil extraction. Hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” not only distresses the local water supply, but provides potential damage to surrounding water aquifers that would be contaminated with various volatile organic compounds or VOCs. The negative externalities of fracking are disproportionately outweighed by the advancing technologies of solar and wind power, as they both can provide a sustainable way of living for future generations. Recognizing such adverse effects of fracking on the environment should catalyze the process of moving from non-renewable energy to renewable energy such as the photovoltaic cells that

what this is talking about how fracking is good and bad.Toxic substances are in fracking fluid and waste-water as well as air pollution from trucks. equipment and the wells themselves along with an increasing number of CNG fueling stations opening throughout the country.Just as plants do today, those living millions of years ago converted the sun's light energy into food (chemical) energy through the process of photosynthesis. Natural gas is most widely used in the industrial and manufacturing sectors chemicals, metals, glass and food processing,among others with its use to heat and power our nation’s homes and businesses expanding rapidly. have been linked to a variety of negative health effects. although fracking creates jobs for people and

Inigenous cultures of Australia and Oceania has chaged the environments in whch they lived in. the difference between New Zealand, Australia and Oceania is that Australia is a country ,Oceania is a group of isands, and New Zealand comes from the Pacific islands. what Australia and New Zealand are two countries located in the Oceania in the Southern Hemisphere. when they explored the South Pacific polynesians brought agriculture to isolated

Throughout the entirety of the sustainability lecture there were three points that really stuck out to me. I found the goals of Danish architect Bjarke Ingels admirable. I think that the public views on a healthy economy versus a healthy environment interesting. Also, the debate on fracking within the UK is something that caught my attention. I believe that all three of these topics/people can relate to one another regarding the conversation of sustainability, not just in the UK, but around the entire world.

Having the experience to go to New Zealand for two weeks in May of 2017. It was their Winter and it was our Summer back here in Hawaii. I had the chance to go with my classmates for our Senior class trip. We got to see both North and South Island. Both parts of New Zealand had different atmosphere. North Island felt like they cared more about keeping the Māori culture alive. While on South Island was more into with

New Zealand is currently practicing democracy system, a system where the powers are vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representations such as public elections (Merriam-Webster online dictionary, n.d). Hence, parliamentary elections must be done every three years to elect new members of Parliament (MPs). On 1986, the formation of Constitution Act 1986 make UK completely powerless to legislate for New Zealand as the residual

In New Zealand we have a constitution therefore ‘person A’ is incorrect as their argument is that we do not have one. They are incorrect because New Zealand has a constitution in the sense of ‘a body of rules determining or providing procedures for determining the organisation, personnel, powers and duties of the organs of government.’ The constitution is unwritten as there is no document generally known as ‘The Constitution’ but it is found in legal documents, decisions of the courts, and in practices. In this context it makes sense for ‘person A’ to believe that New Zealand does not have a constitution as there is not a physical document of all of our constitutional arrangements set out. If you do look at their point of view that way then they are not entirely incorrect, but when incorporating all of the proper information about New Zealand’s constitution it is hard to argue that they do not have one.