Essay On Nursing Prevention

Nurses lacked knowledge in the use and was unaware of the importance of the underlying evidence- base recommended criteria’s indicated on the nurse driven protocol to remove inappropriate UC’s. A nurse driven indwelling catheter removal protocol is an evidence base tool recommended by infection control organization and experts for the early removal of unnecessary or inappropriately placed urinary catheters (UC). Evidence shows that urinary catheters are the source of catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). CAUTI, is the leading cause of hospital acquired infections in the United States. The purpose of this evidence-based quality project is to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention on the importance and use of the nurse driven protocol on nurses ' knowledge and CAUTI rates.

Bernard, M.S., Hunter, K.F., & Moore, K.N. (2012). A review of strategies to decrease the duration of indwelling urethral catheters and potentially reduce the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Urologic Nursing 32(1)

Joint Commission released national patient safety goals for hospitals in January of 2016. These patient safety goals were “established to help accredited organizations address specific areas of concern in regards to patient safety” (Facts about the National Patient Safety Goals, 2015). National patient safety goal 07.06.01 focuses on the prevention of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) in hospitalized patients. Evidence based practice should be implemented to stop these common infections occurring in patients nationwide. Indwelling urinary catheters are only recommended in certain patients, for example to prevent further breakdown of sacral wounds or pressure ulcers in incontinent patients, for comfort in end of life care

National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs), established in 2002 by the Joint Commission, is to help accredited organizations address specific areas of concern in regard to patient safety ("Catheter-Associated," 2015). NPSG.07.06.01 Implement evidence-based practices to prevent indwelling catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) is a 2015 NPSG ("The Joint Commission," 2015). Our facility has 1.32 CAUTIs per 1000 device days (Carson, 2015). Decreasing CAUTIs can be achieved with a strict goal, addressing the financial implications, interdisciplinary collaboration, nursing leadership, a measurement tool, and discussing the future healthcare delivery methods.

Preventing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Older Adults: Improving Health Outcomes through Assessment, Intervention, and Prevention

Also another serious complication of CAUTI is BSI (Blood stream infections) that can be fatal if not caught and treated promptly. “The Clinical Performance of Quality Health Care, along with Joint Commission” offers standards and objectives for facilities to assess measure and improve their standards at the lowest cost possible. The database covers nursing care and education, along with guidelines on prevention. Moreover the JCAHO regulatory standards for catheterized patients are explained and the documentation that is expected when JCAHO inspections are rendered in a facility. The source “Stop orders to reduce inappropriate urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients” states that by following standard precautions with every patient these infections can be prevented. . Also the source explored whether catheters should be used at all in an effort to decrease the incidence of CAUTI’s. Intermittent catheterizations along with supra-pubic were explored with a decreased incidence of bacteria being present in the bladder afterwards. The source “Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals” offered ways of cleansing and disinfecting the skin before insertion to reduce the risk of infection. Many CAUTI’s are linked to bacteria harboring in or around the site at insertion. By using not only aseptic technique but also cleansing the skin with chlorhexadine can decrease he incidence of infection

Urinary tract infections are one of the most hospital-acquired infections in the country. With so much technology and evidence based practice, why is this still an ongoing problem worldwide? Could it simply be the basics of hygiene or just patient negligence? The purpose of this paper is to identify multiple studies that have been done to reduce or prevent hospital associated urinary tract infections. In these articles you will find the use of different interventions that will aid in lowering the risk of these hospital acquired infections.

After an initial search of scholarly databases, a total of fifteen articles was selected for their application to the PICO question. An appraisal of each article uses the following format:

Focus on enhancing quality of care has exaggerated on a nationwide scale. Decreasing preventable damages within the health care settings is being on focus furthermore. From this there has been an immediate connection between repayment to quality through pay-for-reporting and pay-for-execution programs. Around 25% of the hospitalized patients have an indwelling catheter in place (Saint, Kowalski, Forman et al., 2008) and there is a 3% to 7% has the probability to get urinary tract infections in such cases. The infection could cause the signs of bladder distress, trouble in urination, and high temperature in such patients. Analysis shows that 48% of patient who has indwelling catheter complains of pain from the catheter, 42 % experience inconvenience from the catheter and 61% found that their daily activities are exceptionally constrained by these catheters (Saint, Lipsky, Baker, McDonald, & Ossenkop, 1999). Urinary tract infections may prompt bacteremia (infection

This article does not provide the search strategy including a number of databases and other resources which identify key published and unpublished research. In this article, both the primary sources and the theoretical literatures are collected and appraised in order to generate the research question and to conduct knowledge-based research. In the section of the literature review, nineteen professional articles are appraised in order to provide the significance and background of the study. Saint develops the research question based on these analyses. “Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in surgical patients: A controlled study on the excess morbidity and costs” is one of the primary sources written by Givens and Wenzel who conduct and analyze this study. In addition, “Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria” is a review of a literature article which is the secondary source. Although many studies state that patient safety is a top priority and CAUTI can be controlled by the caution of health care providers, the infection rate is relatively high among other nosocomial infections. One of the reasons Saint and colleagues uncovered is unawareness and negligence by health care

The implementation of this component has been delegated to our Quality Indicator Clinical Coordinator. The Quality Indicator goes around every morning to each and every patient that possesses a urinary catheter and asks his or her nurse “What is the reason for the urinary catheter?” and “Can we remove the urinary catheter?” Our organization has put guidelines into action for patients in critical care. These guidelines have been named “No Plastic Left Behind” and are posted throughout the critical care units. The list for when the urinary catheter is not indicated includes, tube feedings, pressors with minimal titration, diuretic IV pushes/PO doses, sedation/ drowsiness/ lethargy, dementia/ confusion, and mechanical ventilation. Indicators for the use and continuous need for a urinary catheter are sepsis (first 24-48 hours), hemodynamically unstable patient, hypothermia protocol in use, ARDS with proning, impella, requires prolonged immobilization with strict bedrest, end of life patients, urinary obstruction and/or retention, diuretic drip, new spinal cord injuries, incontinent patients with a stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer, organ donation patients. Removing the urinary catheter when a patient does not meet the above indicators, consider using urinary alternatives, utilize the urinary retention algorithm, and if

A Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) is a serious problem in the clinical setting. “UTIs are mostly associated with catheterization” (Hooton, 2010, p. 629). The infection can be described as bacteria invading the urinary tract. More so, the bacteria accounts for nosocomial bacteremia since the patient obtains the infection in the hospital (Hooton et al., 2010). A Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) is common because nurses do not find this problem at the top of their to-do list during their shift. It can be easy for the nurse to become accustomed to a slight deviation from the correct method. Any break in the chain of infection has opened the opportunity for microorganisms to reproduce in a susceptible host. Research has proven that when hospitals, long-term care facilities, and other healthcare settings intervene with making positives changes, less of the patients developed a UTI with catheterization. Infection control with catheterized patients can be implemented and resolved with collaboration and education among healthcare staff.

A few weeks ago nursing staff in my facility had a meeting with Nursing Director who was discussing upcoming changes in the nursing practice and interestingly enough one of the topics was related to the subject you mentioned in your thread discussion: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Conversely, VA Hospital nurses have been diligently working on eliminating catheter-associated urinary tract infections by creating a protocol which would empower them as professionals to make an executive decision when to place or remove Foley catheter. As of now, a nurse depends on physician's order to initiate the catheter-related intervention while taking entirely under consideration patient's condition. At the same time, we must remember that

The Quality Improvement nursing process that I have chosen to research is patient safety. I have chosen to focus specifically on the topic of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI’s) during hospitalization and their preventions. It is estimated that 15-25% of hospitalized patients receive a urinary catheter throughout their stay, whether or not they need it. A large 80% of all patients diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) can be attributed to a catheter (Bernard, Hunter, and Moore, 2012). The bacteria may gain entry into the bladder during insertion of the catheter, during manipulation of the catheter or drainage system, around the catheter, and after removal.

The overuse or misuse of indwelling urinary catheters (IUC) is a concern in the emergency department (ED) despite the well-known risks and complications. Although the medically indicated guidelines for use are specific, professionals often ignore the guidelines and insert an IUC without applying evidence-based practice strategies to manage urinary output.