Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide

A controversial human rights issue in modern society is the right to die, an issue that has much to do with the way that human beings relate to society at large, the notion that a man has ownership of their own body, and the obligations set forth in the Hippocratic oath and medical ethics. Physician assisted suicide, or the right to die as those in the pro-assisted suicide movement call it, divides two very different kinds of people into two camps. One’s opinion on the subject is entirely related to one’s core values. Whether one values the individual or whether one places more emphasis on the will of the majority has a great impact on one’s beliefs concerning the issue of the right to die. In this essay, I will prove

In homes across the world, millions of victims are suffering from fatal and terminal illnesses.With death knocking on their door, should these people have to endure pain and misery knowing what is to come? The answers to these questions are very controversial. Furthermore, there is a greater question to be answered—should these people have the right and option to end the relentless pain and agony through physician assisted death? Physician-Assisted Suicide PAS is highly contentious because it induces conflict of several moral and ethical questions such as who is the true director of our lives. Is suicide an individual choice and should the highest priority to humans be alleviating pain or do we suffer for a purpose? Is suicide a purely

Physician-assisted suicide is controversial in healthcare and political realms alike. Currently, this end-of-life option is practiced in five states within the United States. Social concerns regarding assisted suicide revolve around ethical quandaries; providing the means to a patient’s death is contradictory to ethical principles of healthcare providers. Political concerns surrounding the legalization of assisted suicide include disparities in healthcare that may lead to certain populations choosing assisted suicide and the stagnation of current care options. While there is no succinct manner in which to declare assisted suicide right or wrong, each individual must address the social and political concerns surrounding the issue when voting for legislation to legalize assisted suicide or pursuing the option for themselves.

Suicide is one person’s personal decision; physician-assisted suicide is a patient who is not capable of carrying the task out themselves asking a physician for access to lethal medication. What people may fail to see however is that the physician is not the only healthcare personnel involved; it may include, but is not limited to, a physician, nurse, and pharmacist. This may conflict with the healthcare worker’s own morals and there are cases in which the patient suffers from depression, or the patient is not receiving proper palliative care. Allowing physician-assisted suicide causes the physician to become entangled in an ethical and moral discrepancy and has too many other issues surrounding it for it to be legal.

Pain is universal. In life, everyone will feel pain; it is inevitable and cruel. Physical or emotional, insignificant or severe, it is there. The pain continues mounting into an unbearable amount of suffering. Suffering that blots out everything of worth, such as family, love, aspirations, and optimism. Hopelessness seizes any will to endure. With no way to subside or control the pain, often one will go to extremes in order to be free of it. Many take their life, in order to escape the horror. Committing suicide is a traumatizing experience for any and all involved. Life is precious. The chance to live is only given once, and cannot be taken for granted. Preventing even a single life from ending early is imperative and obligatory

Public support for physician assisted suicide was confined to the limited situation where a terminally ill patient would ask a doctor for help to commit suicide. Fifty four percent thought that doctors should

their patients, or to assist them in ending their lives? Many people may believe that physicians would never perform the latter, but in actuality one practice does so. Physician assisted suicide is the intentional ending of one’s life brought on by lethal substances prescribed by a doctor. In the majority of cases, the patient is terminally ill and simply does not desire to live any longer. Their physician provides the medication necessary to end their life. Many supporters aver that this practice is merely an act of compassion as terminally ill persons may suffer extreme pain that eradicates any will to live. They also assert that the decision to die is of the patient’s

Alma Moctezuma Western Governors University WGU Student ID # 000429008 Thesis statement: Research suggests the legalization of assisted suicide is necessary throughout all states in the U.S. because it will give a human being the moral right to choose freely, provide them with an opportunity for death with dignity, and allow for the option of timely organ donation. Annotated Bibliography CNN U.S. Edition.

Evidence of physician-assisted suicide can be traced back to ancient times, especially to ancient Greece or Rome . In fact, the term “euthanasia” comes from the Greek term “a good death” . This controversy has carried over into the modern era, and much of the world is still fragmented over this specific issue; particularly, the United States proves to be split nearly 50-50 on the topic. A poll taken in the United States in 2011 shows that Americans skew slightly toward thinking that physician-assisted suicide is morally wrong, with 48% of Americans thinking it is morally wrong and 45% of Americans thinking it is morally acceptable . However, by changing the phrasing of the question and asking if an individual has a right to end his or her own

Age, political orientation, religious affiliation, and education were found to have no relationship toward the favoring of physician-assisted suicide. It was thought that those younger in age, specifically eighteen to twenty-five would be more likely to favor physician-assisted suicide. This was on the premise that the younger generation would lean more toward pro-choice views. However, there was very little variation between ages of those that took the survey. This is most likely due to the surveys being distributed on a college campus where the age range is predominately eighteen to twenty-five. More variation among the ages would need to be established for clearer

Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide are both types of medical assistance aiding in ending a suffering patient’s life. This pain may be due to a terminal illness and suffering as well as those in an irreversible coma. This practice of doctor assisted suicide is illegal in many countries, but is increasing in popularity as people start to recognize the positive aspects that euthanasia has to offer for those that fit the criteria. Euthanasia is essential for those, placed in such life diminishing situations, and whom no longer want to experience suffering. This is where the issue gets complicated, and many religious groups argue that individuals should not have the legal right to choose whether they get to die or not, but that it is simply in God’s hands. Suffering patients argue that they should be given the right to choose whether or not they have to experience this suffering, to end their life with the dignity they still have, and to alleviate the stress that their deteriorating life conditions have on their families, themselves and the entire healthcare system. Therefore, despite the many arguments, euthanasia can have a very positive impact on the lives and families of suffering individuals, as well as the Canadian healthcare system.

There are “right-to-die” movements that advocated laws backing physician assisted-suicide. However, assisted-suicide should not be legalized in all states. Not only does it violate government laws and medical ethics, it also endangers socially marginalized groups, and

* Researchers at Duke University recently surveyed hundreds of frail elderly patients receiving outpatient treatment and their families. The elderly patients themselves strongly opposed physician-assisted suicide: only 34% favored legalization, with support even lower among female and black patients. But 56% of their younger relatives favored it, and they were usually wrong in predicting the elderly patients' views.

However, it presents a much larger data set and aims to understand an overall global perspective on this issue. The article, “Religion and Nurses’ attitudes to Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide,” they study the association of religion, ideologies, experience, and training with nurses’ attitudes directly primarily towards euthanasia. The researchers in this study believed that a medical assistants opinion may be more strongly based on their previous experience and training in the field of palliative care, rather than their religious or ideological standpoints. To understand the strength religion has on nurses compared to their experience, the researchers conducted a mass study of previous studies of the topic and comparing the results. The study, done in 2008, identified 347 articles that possibly could make a good match for the study, these articles were then refined to a select 31 that were studied more in depth. These articles consisted primarily of quantitative research, but also included reviews and a qualitative study as well. Upon comparison of these studies, they found that the results were inconclusive, with about two-thirds of the articles supporting a correlation between religion and attitudes, while the others negated the hypothesis. More specific results were reported in four categories: religious or ideological affiliation, observance of religious

In conclusion, much of the data agrees, religiosity should have an inverse relationship with opinions on doctor assisted suicide. Religiosity, as well as, race and denomination seem to be significant predictors when assessing the likelihood of supporting or opposing euthanasia or doctor assisted suicide. The most difficult part of analyzing previous research is understanding if all the researchers define certain concepts in the same way. This makes it hard to adequately compare studies due to the possible misalignment of data from one author to the next. It is also difficult to remove bias in studies such as these. When asking people to self-assess their religiosity, it could be very difficult for them to give an accurate answer for fear