preview

Essay On The Differences Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document

Differences Between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution
There are many differences in the Articles of Confederation that was written in 1777 and the Constitution, which was later written in 1787. The Articles of Confederation can be considered the United States’ first constitution and was written “during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.” (Knoedl). The Constitution was written because in the Articles of Confederation, the states were more interested in themselves and not as a government as a whole. The Constitution provided the framework for us to form a more perfect government together. There are many similarities and differences that can be found between the two documents.
After the United …show more content…

If it wasn’t for the Articles of Confederation, then we would have not learned how to make a stronger second constitution. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress could pass laws but could not enforce them. If a state did not like the federal law, then they could just simply ignore the law. Congress also had no power to levy taxes or any right to regulate trade between states. (Knoedl). The major flaw in the Articles of Confederation might be the fact that in order to amend it, the decision had to be unanimous. This proved to be an extremely challenging …show more content…

As mentioned earlier, the Articles of Confederation says that it cannot be amended without all the states agreement, while in the Constitution, only three fourths must agree. The Articles of Confederation gave the individual states power with minimal central government and the Constitution gives the main power to the central government. And lastly, the Articles of Confederation gave power to only one Congress and the Constitution gives the power to one Congress but has two sub-divisions, the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Get Access