Essay On The Post-Test Survey

1. A Likert scale (/ˈlɪkərt/[1]) is a psychometric scale commonly involved in research that employs questionnaires. It is the most widely used approach to scaling responses in survey research, such that the term is often used interchangeably with rating scale, or more accurately the Likert-type scale. One of the most common scale types is a Likert scale. A Likert scale is commonly used to measure attitudes, knowledge, perceptions, values, and behavioral changes. A Likert-type scale involves a series of statements that respondents may choose from in order to rate their responses to evaluative questions

In this chapter, I will analyse the data according to the principles proposed, such as Likert’s scale. According to the data collected, I will come out with certain conclusions to predict the respondents’

Overall the results of the pre-and post-survey show a positive increase in all areas measured. As shown in Appendix XI, questions 1 and 6-10 (self-perceived technical and non-technical competency) showed a statistically significant increase when comparing the pre- and post-intervention surveys. All 10 questions demonstrated an increase in positive Likert scale responses, though only questions 1 and 6-10 had a statistically significant increase (p = < .05). In addition to a statistically significant increase in these Likert responses, the pre-and post-implementation surveys demonstrated an increase in the proportion of Likert

The participants were asked to complete a survey. The first step was for the participants to read and understand the information regarding the rules of the survey before they began. After reading and complying with the rules, the participants had a choice to continue with the survey or opt out. The volunteers, were then presented with the newly created measure of fifteen questions regarding their level of anger. Following that were two other measures rating their level of aggression. All the questions were presented for each measure at a time. The participants needed to complete a measure before going to the next one. When the participants completed the final measure, the survey asked the participants to respond to two questions with a short response. When they finished, participants were asked to identify their demographics by answering the demographics questions. A total of 64 questions (including the three measures, two short response and demographics) were given to the participants taking roughly ten minutes to complete. The participants completed the survey online at their own pace without any supervision.

Per the assignment instructions, this paper will present the prospective study’s guiding theoretical perspective along with its corresponding propositions and concepts followed by a brief discussion of potential extant instruments capable of capturing these dimensions. Next, a review of examples of operationalization methods used to construct variables from those items in prior research will precede the unveiling of research questions and hypotheses intended for the exploration of the theory. Lastly, survey items adapted from substantiated scales will be presented at the conclusion of this paper. To assist in the navigation of the paper and

Likert scale was used for both questionnaires to measure quality and importance of subject matter.

The initial item pool consisted of 140 items on a five point likert scale. Hinkin (1998) suggests that the statements of the items should be as simple and short as possible, something that Glick and Fiske (1996) did seem to keep in mind. Double-barreled and leading questions / statements also seemed to be avoided for the most part. Hinkin also

The self-assessment, “How Stressful is my Life” is an evaluation tool used to help measure an individual stress in their life thereby predicting the risk of potential health related illness associated with stress. The evaluation measured different events in an individual’s life, over the last 12 months, whether positive or negative. Each event is weighted and all that apply is added for a total score. Based on the total score and where it fits into a predetermined range, suggest the level of stress an individual possess.

The research survey consisted of 26 questions. The questions were constructed by using: the Likert scale from 1-7(1 –not at all to 7-very), close-ended questions, open-ended questions, multiple choice questions, and demographic questions. The questions were formulated around attractiveness. How does the

Likert scale (p.157) – scale used that is comprised of different rating values/ Researchers may use a Likert Scale when surveying their participants when asking them things about an experience the participants had. This is a common tool used in restaurants, when they ask people dining to rate how their service/experience was. Researchers can then use that information to put out either positive or negative information about a specific restaurant. An example of a Likert scale being used in research is if the participants in the study use a Likert rating scale to assess how many times a year they diet or exercise.

The strength of questionnaires is it can give an insight into respondent’s thoughts and opinions and also cost efficient as it is inexpensive.

3. Nominal and ordinal. Again, an interval scale would be possible if ranges were not given for each response, which limits the responses to ordinal. The nominal level provides some additional information, especially with the last possible response.

that their findings indicate that it is feasible to use the k-NN method with Likert

Open-ended questions allow for a greater variety of responses from participants but are difficult to analyze statistically because the data must be coded or reduced in some manner. Closed-ended questions are easy to analyze statistically, but they seriously limit the responses that participants can give. Many researchers prefer to use a Likert-type scale because it’s very easy to analyze statistically. (Jackson, 2009, p. 89)

Oral Assessment instruments should have an acceptable level of reliability in terms of internal consistency, test and re-test reliability and alternative form reliability. Its content must also have the necessary validity to be a valid assessment instrument, must be predictive and concurrent.