Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

At this moment, millions of animals know cold cages in laboratories as home, but why? Some of these animals are subjects for medical research purposes, while others are used out of pure curiosity and to test different products. Majority of these animals are used in painful experiments and are left in agony. While many of them die, a few animals survive, but these unfortunate ones wish they could be put out of their misery as well. Although scientists have resources they could use to lower the pain each animal endures and even alternatives of their test subjects, millions of innocent creatures are still suffering. The fact that animals are still used when animal experimentation is avoidable and not necessary makes animal testing unethical.

are not able to give consent for this as would be required of a human. Other

Animal testing has been bad of the years and it can even be dated back to the ancient times of the greek. Physicians would dissect animals with the pure interest to obtain knowledge. But even then, one such physician stated that he would rather use a pig as his subject because he wanted to.The ethics of animal testing has always been questioned. Humans do not want to think of animals as on the same level of us. The similarity is terrifying and makes the cruelness obvious. In the 16 century it has been recorded that early vivisectionists, scientists who perform experiments and operations on live animals, did not consider animals to be of the same lineage of us and barely cared for them.The remaining are used as test dummies for products.

The subject of animal testing when it comes to religion is exceedingly debated. As long as there is no unnecessary pain inflicted onto the animals and there is a real possibility of benefit to human beings, then Jewish, Christian, and Muslim teaching allows for animal experimentation. On the other hand, many people believe that since religious traditions, such as Hindu or Buddashism, tell us to be merciful to animals, we should not cause them suffering by experimenting on them.

In this research i will be going to explain the cons of animals testing. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animal testing is wasteful, it is bad science, 92 out of 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans.

Supporters of animal testing might say that the tests help find new research that gets us one step closer to curing many diseases but they are misguided. Research shows that animals have different structure when compared to human beings making them poor test subjects. Animals have significantly different anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences that make it hard to compare to humans. This fact proves that animal testing will get us nowhere in curing or helping humans in any way. Studies have shown that it creating an animal model that mimics the human model is nearly impossible . This statement is also false because animal tests may mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments.If it misleads the researches then it does not make sense for animal testing to still exist. One example of this case is chemicals that are proven harmful for animals but proven beneficial for humans. One case of this incident is aspirin where it seemed to cause liver failure for animals but benefits

Another point of opposition directed towards animal testing is the belief that research on animals is irrelevant to the beneficiary of people because animals are different from people, rendering experiments inaccurate and useless. PETA has noted that the Food and Drug Association has accounted, “...92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials,” due to the inability of working or its potential danger.

To begin, one of the most important reasons why animal testing should be unacceptable, is because the human species is very different compared to any other animal; therefore, they make unreliable test subjects. For example, according to PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), they found that nearly 150 clinical trials [human tests] of treatments, to reduce inflammation in critically ill patients, have been undertaken, and all of them failed, despite all the animal tests being successful (Should Animals Be Used for

Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Every year, more than a hundred million animals- including mice, dogs, cats, rabbits, monkeys, and many more- are killed in the U.S. They are killed for laboratories in biology lessons, training, curiosity experiments, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Experimenting on animals is a cruel way of testing products. Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. Most experiments involving animals are flawed, which wastes the lives of the animals. Also, animals suffer just like humans, so it is speciesism to experiment on animals while refraining from experimenting on humans.

There are numerous studies that document the failure of animal testing. Scientific studies have documented failures of animal testing, which is not surprising given the many differences that exist between human and animal species in terms of their anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, and metabolism. Although animal testing has helped us, it has also led us down countless scientific dead ends, while detracting attention and funds from more applicable scientific techniques. In reality, animal research never guarantees that medications and other products will be safe and effective for us humans. Most drugs that were previously tested on other animals have been pulled off the market because they caused severe illness or death in human patients (France

Many people in America test on animals for health care items, cosmetics, and other medical items. Animal testing first started in 500 B.C., so 500 years before christ. Also, animal testing is legal and that happened in 1966. Next, what they do to these animals when they get experimented on is to test medical treatments, cosmetics, and other health related items and also, in the past the Greeks would do a live dissection of live animals. Ultimately, animal testing is cruel and inhumane and should become illegal.

First of all, animal testing is immoral and atrocious. According to the ‘US Department of Agriculture (USDA), in 2010, 97,123 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief.’ From this, we can notice that a lot of animals are agonized and deteriorated. In addition, the environment of laboratories where animals live are extremely poor. For instance, all animals are locked up in small cages and animals’ limbs are chained tightly in severe cases. These examples show how animals are treated barbarously and forced by humans. Therefore, animal testing should be regulated and should keep safe of the animals in order to make the test less immoral.

Imagine being a rabbit; a vertebrate and warm blooded species. Hopping around an open field and eating all greens. All of sudden, you were captured by an unknown human. You start to rattle around your cage figuring out how to escape. About “twenty-five million and 30 million” animals are exploited in experiments; “half are only used through education” (Donna 7).

Animal testing is cruel, against God, and can be avoided. Each year over 100 million animals die in United States laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Animal testing dates all the way back to 258 B.C. The famous Greek doctor Galen (AD 129-200) studied animals. William Harvey used animals 400 years ago to discover how blood circulated in the body. Animal testing eventually made its way over to the United States in 1965.

Nearly every disease known to humans has been researched at some point in time using animals (Lee). As a matter of fact 100 million animals are used in chemical, food, cosmetic, and medical testing every year (Mendoza). Testing on animals can be cruel and inhumane. Many of the test done to animals have already been performed. Despite animal testing alternatives many researchers still use animals in research today. Animals should not be used in research.