Adopting and implementing a universal helmet law for the State of Arizona is associated with a variety of costs as well as benefits. The most obvious benefit is the amount of lives that could potentially be saved by a universal helmet law. Studies and research have consistently proven that wearing a helmet while operating a motorcycle greatly decreases the prevalence of injuries and fatalities associated with motorcycle accidents. There is no price that can be put on a human life. In my opinion, if a universal helmet law can save even one life then it is worth whatever the monetary cost necessary to implement it. If a universal helmet law were to be implemented in the State of Arizona, healthcare costs for the state would decrease. Since helmets aid in preventing motorcycle accident injuries and fatalities there would be a decrease in motorcycle responsible ailments and medical visits. Furthermore, in the event that a motorcycle injury were to occur it is likely that the injuries would be less severe and require less medical attention and intervention, thus reducing the costs of medical care each year. …show more content…
A great deal of money would be required to fund education and community outreach efforts. Furthermore, it is likely that there would be a significant number of individuals in Arizona who would oppose the law. A universal helmet law could be perceived by individuals as the government intruding upon their rights and freedoms. It is important to acknowledge and recognize this opinion, and ensure the public that this is not a law designed for the government to control another area of constituents lives. Therefore, money would also need to be allocated to town hall meetings, advertising, and lobbyists to support the passing of the bill into a
Helmets are not always safe to wear while driving. It can be a distraction to others and it can cause a collision. For example, Football players wear helmets
law on or state. So I strongly agree with his idea because we can prevent a lot of accident
Have you ever had a concussion. Were you wearing a helmet. Well even though helmets cannot prevent every concussion but they definitely lower the number of concussions every year. Helmets save lives said Dr. Nav Persaud a doctor at a family center in toronto. There are about 70 cycling deaths per year with helmets we could lower that by 28.5 %every year. In some places around the world it is illegal to not wear a helmet if you are below the age of 18 which proves that helmets can prove concussions.
One issue that is a major part of concussion prevention is how the equipment is actually being processed and the tests done on the equipment to be able to show level of protection that can be provided, such as helmet strength and padding. For many decades, the standards for helmet protection was focused more so on preventing injuries, such as fractured skulls, than it was on concussion preventions. The National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) has recently revised its standards for helmet protection. NOCSAE does not make or produce helmets but rather creates and sets the testing standard for the helmet; standard tests include the “drop test” where a weight is dropped onto the helmet from certain heights to test how well the helmet reduces the linear force. Other tests that have recently been added include testing the rotational force a helmet can bare and also helps to simulate any angle that a force may come from, just like a hit during a football game. This is also “…another step forward because rotational forces
The problem with helmet-to-helmet hits is that it is too dangerous for the player being hit and the player doing the hitting. “You could have a helmet with 6 inches thick of padding and it will not change a thing”(Essay about). Because of the speed and force of the impact it takes to tackle someone, it can still be life threatening. So there’s really no way to make a helmet-to-helmet hit safe.
Arizona is one of four states that has yet to put a law against distracted driving into effect. The definition of distracted driving is defined as the practice of driving a motor vehicle while engaged in another activity. 21% of fatal accidents involving a teen driver were caused by distracted driving. Do these statistics confirm that a harsh distracted driving law need to be in effect or should it be a personal responsibility of oneself or the parents of young drivers. As more states create distracted driving laws the number of deaths each year are still rising meaning that these law that are being set are not fixing the issue and are seemingly making it worse. Distracted driving should be a personal responsibility and not a law that needs
Do you agree with this law? Why or why not? Research a similar law in your own state.
Recently, a primary seat belt law was proposed during a legislative meeting for our state. The law would allow for drivers to be pulled over specifically for not wearing their seat belts. Currently, only 77 percent of Montanans buckle-up. This is much lower than the national average of 88 percent and significantly less than Texas, Washington, and Oregon, where fines ranging from $110 to $200 likely play a part in about 94 percent of people buckling up. Similar bills were proposed in Montana in 2011 and 2013, but they did not pass. Whether the primary seat belt law goes through or not, there are several things you can do to help prevent anyone in your family from suffering a personal injury in a vehicle accident.
So the debates continue; Should a universal helmet law become mandatory throughout the U.S? The following will explore the various pros, cons, and arguments that fuel this debate.
According to the Office of Highway Safety Planning, riders without helmets are 40% more likely to suffer fatal head injuries than those with helmets, and are 15% more likely to incur nonfatal head injuries. When you consider that approximately 3,250 motorcycle accidents occur every year in Michigan, the passage of this new law would lead to hundreds of deaths and head injuries every year that could have been prevented. Michigan is the latest state to
The great American football is full of exciting competition, but do we realize the danger! Helmet safety in football remains an immense problem as the sport accounts for the highest incidence of concussions. Since leather football helmets, the technology for safer football helmets has improved drastically and continue to improve. The development of newly designed helmets and technology has lowered the risk of head injuries for players. Furthermore, improvements in helmet testing methods have led to better understand head injuries and the protectiveness of the helmet. However, football helmet safety still remains a challenge, such as a necessity of a proper categorization system to rank helmets and
Every state, other than New Hampshire, requires drivers to carry their state’s minimum requirements to legally drive a vehicle. Still, there are those who refuse to follow the letter of the law. In fact, in 2012 the Insurance Research Council found that one in eight drivers on the road don’t have insurance at all, totalling 30 million uninsured motorists nationwide.
Across the United States, every year millions of license drivers choose to ride motorcycles rather than drive automobiles for a variety of reasons; Reasons range from individual pleasure to a much more cost effective way to travel. The universal motorcycle helmet law debate over the past forty years has revolved around whether the federal government should adopt a universal helmet law that mandates all motorcyclists to wear helmets at all times when riding to reduce societies economic cost, or whether the individual rider should have the right to choose rather to wear or not wear a helmet.
It would upset the established balance between safety and the integrity of the game. Maintaining the current standards would allow for the continued respect for the historical roots of the game, as well as preventing the evolution towards a more violent sport. When examining this issue, the psychological and physical effects of headgear, specifically helmets or face-shielding styles, is questionable at best. In a complicated situation such as this, when concern for safety collides with a cultural integrity, the best path is one of calculated measures. Therefore, utilizing other methods as to not alter the game, deter focus from other potential dangers, or disturb the unique nature of the game is the best plan of
Many people think that to wear a helmet should a personal desition and should be not mandatory. After all, if harm is cause for not wearing a helmet, it will be a personal harm and no a general harm for society, “People have the right to chose their own poison” (Rosenstand, 255).