Essay On Washington Vs. Dubois

The debate between Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Dubois turned out to be one of the greatest intellectual as well as inspiring battles in our United States history. This great debate sparked the interest of African Americans and whites throughout the entire country. Both men had distinct views on how blacks should go about progressing politically, socially, as well as financially here in the United States. Both Du Bois and Washington wanted African-Americans to have the same rights as white Americans; But Du Bois encouraged African-Americans to demand equal rights, while Washington, on the other hand, often ignored discrimination. He believed that it was important for blacks to develop

Dubois said, “Mr. Washington distinctly asks that black people give up, at least for the present, three things, --First, political power, second, insistence on civil rights, third, higher education of Negro youth, and concentrate all their energies on industrial education, and accumulation of wealth, and the conciliation of the South.” Washington believed that the blacks could not move forward without giving up political power, civil rights, and higher education. He thought they had to give up those ideas for now and focus on wealth, industrial education and be friendly with the south. He thought once these objects were accomplished then the blacks could obtain the freedom and rights they wanted. Therefore, he felt that for now the color-line was ok because blacks needed to first earn their rights before they were handed over to them.

When it all comes down to it, one of the greatest intellectual battles U.S. history was the legendary disagreement between Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois. This intellectual debate sparked the interest of the Northerners as well as the racist whites that occupied the south. This debate was simply about how the blacks, who just gained freedom from slavery, should exist in America with the white majority. Even though Washington and DuBois stood on opposite sides of the fence they both agreed on one thing, that it was a time for a change in the treatment of African Americans. I chose his topic to write about because I strongly agree with both of the men’s ideas but there is some things about their views that I don’t agree with. Their

In the late 19th and 20th century, African Americans were going through hardships. At this period of time, they wanted improvement and wanted to be treated equality but no one had the political background to fight with the Whites. However, two great leaders named Booker Washington and W.E.B Du Bois took the stance and fought for improvement. But, even though they had the goals, they had different strategies for the community.

By the mid twentieth century, Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois were the two most persuasive dark men in the nation. Washington's propitiatory way to deal with social equality had made him skilled at raising money for his Tuskegee Institute, and in addition for other dark associations, and had likewise charmed him to the white foundation, including President Theodore Roosevelt, who regularly counseled him in regards to all issues dark. Then again, Du Bois had at that point turn into the nation's premier dark scholarly, having distributed various persuasive chips away at the states of dark Americans. Rather than Washington, Du Bois kept up that instruction and social liberties were the best way to balance, and that surrendering their interest would basically serve to strengthen the thought of blacks as peons. Following a progression of articles in which the two men elucidated their philosophies, their disparities at last reached a crucial stage when, in 1903, Du Bois distributed a work titled The Souls of Black Folks, in which he straightforwardly reprimanded Washington and his approach and went ahead to request full social equality for blacks.

W.E.B. Dubois was the rivaling civil rights leader during the early 20th century. W.E.B. Dubois believed that through political action and education, full-citizenship of African Americans in America would be achieved. At first, he agreed with Booker T. Washington’s teachings, however through time Dubois realized flaws within Washington’s ideas. Dubois, in “Soul of Black Folk” writes, “The black men of America have a duty to perform, a duty stern and delicate, -- a forward movement to oppose a part of the work of their greatest leader. So far as Mr. Washington peaches

One of the primary differences between DuBois and Washington was in the ways they believed equality would be achieved. DuBois believed that political change was the first step in achieving equality. If the black populous worked on economy only then they would perpetuate the stereotypes that white people place upon them. By accepting racist and prejudicial viewpoints, the African American communities were affirming their inferiority to the white majority. Only through political equality, for example the right to vote, could men enact any real or meaningful social and

DuBois philosophies possessed a “fight for right’s mentality”. His view was that everyone has a “constitutional right” to freedom and equality. Du Bois took a forceful stance against Booker T. Washington's strategies of “working within the system”, calling instead for "ceaseless agitation and insistent demand for equality," and the "use of force of every

W.E.B. DuBois, a black intellectual believed that Washington's strategy would only serve to perpetuate white oppression. DuBois initially advocated for Washington's strategy, however he grew to find it unacceptable as he became more outspoken about racial injustice. DuBois campaigned for a civil rights agenda and argued that educated blacks could accomplish social change. With the belief that African Americans should work together to battle inequality DuBois helped found the NAACP. DuBois was not content with attempting to gain an economic foothold; he wanted absolute equality in all aspects of life. DuBois believed that Washington "devalued the study of liberal arts, and ignored the economic exploitation of the black masses. He believed that "The Negro Race, like all races, is going to be saved by its exceptional men. The problem of education then, among Negroes, must first of all deal with the ‘Talented Tenth.' [which] is the problem of developing the best of this race that they may guide the Mass away from the contamination and death of the worst." He believed that the economic and political issues facing African Americans could be solved if the most talented ten

Dubois writings, unlike Washington’s writings survived aging and sounds modern. Both Dubois and Washington, however, wanted the best for their people, both were sincerely engaged in racial uplift, and therefore in the end neither was “right” or “wrong.” Indeed, Washington’s ideas fitted the era that he lived in and Dubois ideas the future.

Women should not have the chance for an academic education. They should be trained to cook, clean, and take care of children. What better way would a woman help society? Would she help her neighbor more by teaching them mathematics they will never use or by helping their neighbor raise children? This is similar to what Booker T. Washington claimed about African Americans. He stated that the African Americans should attend vocational schools rather than receive an academic education so they could better further social change. W.E.B DuBois had a different approach to further social change by stating that some African Americans should go to academic schools, while others had trades, and some were considered fools who cannot learn.

Washington were two incredible pioneers of the African American people group in the late nineteenth and mid-twentieth century. Their contradicting methods of insight can be found in a lot of the present exchange over how to end class and racial foul play, what is the part of African American Leadership, and what did Dubois and Washington showed in the African American people group.

One of the main differences between Washington and Du Bois stems from Washington’s Atlanta Address, which proved to be one of the most controversial speeches of the decade. In this address Washington talks of a tale of two ships, one has depleted its clean water supply when another ship stops by to assist the other. A sailor on the second ship says to “cast down your bucket where you are.” This tale became famous due to Washington explaining that it is better to start were you are and ground yourself in order to self-improve and grow. This means that one should work for their success rather than to aspire to affluent ventures, such as higher education. Du Bois and many other higher educated African Americans felt that Washington was asking the underrepresented and

Washington and DuBois speeches are both centered around discrimination and civil rights of the African American population. In the beginning of both speeches, DuBois and Washington make statements on the rights of African Americans, while comparing their rights to the white population. In DuBois speech, he says, “Fear to let black men even try to rise lest they become the equals of the white. And this is the land that professes to follow Jesus Christ. The blasphemy of such a course is only matched by its cowardice.” In comparison, Washington states, “I pledge that in your effort to work out the great and intricate problem which God has laid at the doors of the South, you shall have at all times the patient, sympathetic help of my race; only let this

Washington and DuBois both explain how African Americans are willing to work for their rights through the establishment of ethos in order to reveal their credibility in relation to African Americans achieving equality. The expression of the African Americans will to work for their equality shows how once they do achieve their equality, they will perform to their highest potential in turn helping the United States economy, and fulfilling the foundations of the country. Washington promotes his credibility by explaining the willingness of African Americans