Essay On Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama

College athletes are taken advantage of and deserve to be compensated for their services while playing sports. These students are exploited and used to make money and out of everything that particular school makes, the athlete never given a penny of it. All of the hard works, blood, sweat and tears that they put into that

For years now there have been the argument if college athletes should be paid to play or not. It is an ongoing debate between many people including the National Collegiate Athletic Association(NCAA), athletes, coach, and other various people. The has debate has gone far enough that a lawsuit has started over it. There are many arguments for college athletes being paid such as; the athletes do not have time to work, their images are being used without any type of pay, and how the NCAA and coaches make millions of dollars off of the players while the players do not make anything. On the flip side of this, arguments that the athletes should not be paid include; they get paid in other varies ways, the average college athletic department loses enough money already without paying the athletes, and the fact that not all college athletes are in school to become professional athletes anyhow so making money from their athletic abilities should not be an issue for them at all.

Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is able to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. These rules have long been challenged, however no changes have been made by the NCAA. With universities grossing close to $200 million a year college athletics has turned into one of the top industries in the world. The NCAA is a governing body of college athletics, but without people questioning the NCAA and demanding changes to the monopoly that the NCAA is nothing will happen to the unfairness to college athletes like it is currently.

Therefore students should be compensated for the time they have put on the field or court. While professional athletes are allowed to earn money however they want, college athletes cannot or else they will not be able to play the next season. “Anybody that wants to pay a pro can, but paying college athletes is a big no-no. Athletes have no time to get a job and earn money. Student athletes that do not focus on sports will not be able to play at all” (Looney). From personal experience, playing a sport, especially at a high level, takes a lot of practice. That is a hefty task considering that many athletes have to receive an education as well. Many athletes do not even have time for education because of all the time needed to practice. Furthermore, many athletes have little to no time to hold a steady job, let alone receive a degree. In the past, many college athletes have been suspended or fined for taking money from signature sessions or selling pictures of themselves. “NCAA should allow students to receive money from people based on their performance level. Keeping athletes poor will bring about shady characters” (Looney). One year ago, the NCAA suspended Johnny Manziel, Texas A&M quarterback, for the first half of the season opener. The NCAA suspended him for allegedly taking money from signing autographs which is against their policy. This year, a running back from Georgia ran into the

Are college athletes getting ripped off? Are they put into an unfair situation? Currently, college athletes do not get paid and they do not receive wages because the National Collegiate Coaches Association (NCAA) president feels that college athletes are not professionals, they are just college students who also play a sport. College athletes should be paid because the NCAA and colleges collect an extremely large amount of money from the athletes bringing in revenue, and it would make the sport more competitive.

Now granted college student athletes usually have scholarships which covers tuition, housing, fees, and course related books. That’s what a lot of people argue about, when someone says “college students should get paid.” College student athletes don’t have time for a job at all. The schedule of an average college student athlete consists of going to classes, practicing for 2-3 hours, going to a mandatory study hall to do homework or study. These athletes spend up to 44.8 per week on their sports (Hartnell) . It's almost nearly impossible for college athletes to even have time to have a good paying job. Colleges should pay their athletes' in some payment, not saying that they should get $1 million but $2500 wouldn't kill anything. People claim that the NCAA couldn't afford to pay college student athletes, but the NCAA is a multi-billion company. Nevertheless college student athletes need some extra pocket change to help them make things meet, and to help college athletes learn to manage their

College athletes being paid has become an interesting debate in recent years. People are starting to get different feelings of the old way of not paying amateurs. Profits are so easily made in today’s age through social media, advertisements, apparel, and ticket sales, that programs are bringing in millions of dollars each year off the likeness of their athletes. Athletes dedicate their lives to the sports they play and it consumes their time. Data shows that some colleges do bring in millions of dollars a year in profit, but many colleges around the US are struggling to break even. Should college athletes be rewarded for their hard work and dedication? Opponents of paying college athletes point out that they are rewarded through scholarships,

In the article titled "Enough Madness: Just Pay College Athletes" by Allen R. Sanderson, John J. Siegfried say that the school gains large amount of revenue from television for football and men's basketball, a new football playoff system and seven-figure compensation packages for college coaches all attest to the financial vitality of the college game. Most universities have various men's and women's sports teams and the athletes on the team receive their scholarships and grants that greatly reduce the amount of money they have to spend on college tuition. However, the NCAA sets a limit on how much money in scholarships and grants an athlete receives. With all the work and hours spent by the athletes for a scholarship that doesn't offer an amount that seems reasonable for the amount of work that is put in. The revenues flowing to NCAA members and the relative low amount going to the players, who are the people most responsible for generating those revenues, has caused a growing unease in public opinion if college athletes should be paid.

NCAA College athletes deserved to receive payment for the life they live. The reason why is due to schedule,the lack of money athletes can make, profit the schools make, and profit the NCAA makes..Although, college athletics in all organizations is important NCAA is the most profitable.As a college athlete who is also dealing with a school schedule they need a little help. The fact that people assume the scholarship makes everything so easy is false. A lot of hard work went into getting those scholarships and that shouldn’t be taken away from them. NCAA College athletes deserve to be paid.

There will be college athletes to get paid. The NCAA has voted on the choice to let sixty- five teams from big power conferences, the ACC, Pac 12, Big 10, and SEC, including Notre Dame, would be able to make their own decisions on paying their athletes. “If you’re an athlete, going for zero to three-thousand five hundred dollars is in a lot better,” said Andy Schwarz, an economist who has done work for the plaintiffs in the Ed O’Bannon case. “But, it still misses the point entirely” (Schwarz). Athletes will start to be guaranteed the benefits that they deserve while being paid by these “Top five” divisions and will be able to pay for things like families of the athletes, more money in athletic health care coverage, and to pay for post season

In the year 2014, the National College Athletic Association (NCAA) made almost one billion dollars through ticket sales, merchandise licensing, and TV contracts (Sports). Yet, none of that money ever ends up in the pockets of the athletes, who are responsible for bringing in all of the revenue, who train for countless hours per week, leaving little time for anything outside of sports. Practice and constant travel, added to the stresses of school work, make it difficult for a college athlete to hold down a job. The NCAA is unfairly making money from the athletes, and the athletes should get a cut of the profit. College athletes should be paid to play.

But that does not make it right. Cons on why athletes should not be paid, financial irresponsibility, unfair compensation between players and more. It is also cheating paying a college athlete. Football and basketball are the two main sports where college athletes get paid. Football and basketball are to most popular sports. Other reasons why athletes should not be paid. Most colleges lose money from sports that are not good ot that are not making and sells. If university, NCAA, or college coaches are going to pay athletes, they have to pay them all. Not schools has enough money for every single athlete that attends their school. Athletes even have to pay the ones that do not play and then athletes might have to pay the staff that gets their water, cleans their jerseys etc. The managers of the

Before I get into my argument, let me first explain to you what the NCAA is. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was founded by President Theodore Roosevelt in 1906 as a non-profit organization to oversee the athletics and education for more than 450,000 student athletes. The NCAA governs 23 different sports including football, basketball, hockey, gymnastics, cross-country, volleyball, and many more. The NCAA is dedicated to helping student-athletes succeed on the field, in their academics, and throughout the rest of their life. Now that you know a little bit about what the NCAA is, let’s get into the controversy surrounding paying college athletes.

Paying colleges athletes is one of the biggest debates in college sports history. The argument has been around for at least a decade, with people believing in positive effects and negative effects. College athletes have been playing sports without pay since the beginning. It has begun to gain popularity within the last few years due to incidents such as Reggie Bush. He received more than $100,000 in financial aid from the University of Southern California. Paying or giving gifts to players is a violation of NCAA rules. The NCAA is an organization that is in charge of college sports in the United States. The idea of paying college athletes has its pros and cons. Some people believe the pros outweigh the cons, but some people think different.