Essay On Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

To pay or not to pay, that is the question. This question, one of disparity, confronts the NCAA all the time today. Football and basketball players generate billions of dollars in revenue for their schools but do not receive any. College athletes cannot be paid because of the “no pay” rules and the “Principle of Amateurism.” The NCAA will not have to deal with as many rule violations and scandals. Plus, the NCAA could still label an amateurism principle without actually crossing the line with professionalism. Because athletes are focusing solely on sports and have no time to do anything else, athletes need money to support themselves. Not only does the school acquire revenue from ticket sales, apparel and sponsorships, but it becomes more

The NCAA generates billions of dollars a year in revenue, through exploiting their athletes, and demeaning higher educations making them one of the most powerful and dangerous organizations in sports. The total annual revenue of the NCAA is $10.6 billion. very year, individually, every large Division I Men’s basketball school makes about $10.1 million dollars, and every large conference football school makes around $15.8 million per year (“NCAA College”). That revenue is split between a variety of things such as: ticket sales, tv and apparel contracts, and other merchandise sales (“NCAA College”). Perhaps the most profitable part of the NCAA is the television contracts. In 1961, Byers, then the commissioner of the NCAA, hired chief lobbyist

Ever since 1843, when the first college boat team was developed at Yale University, college athletes that involve themselves in any sporting program have not been able to receive payment for their work. According to the National Collegiate Athletic Association, athletes are considered “amateurs” and not “employees,” so their college cannot mail them a paycheck, even though the athletes are the ones that bring the numbers to the college. So how are the athletes supposed to financially support themselves when they have no time to work for a business that will actually pay them? They can’t, which is why things should be changed so college athletes can be paid for the hours they put into a sport, the merchandise and advertising they are used for, and so it makes up for the ways that their college confines them and their potential.

First, college athletes should be paid for them to stay in school. Next, athletes work harder than students. Finally, selling merchandise with signature on it is against NCAA laws. Paying athletes could keep them in school because they could go a different way in their life instead of sports. “If college athletes were paid for the talents that they possess

One of the most controversial subjects we as individuals hear about this day in age is whether or not college athletes deserve to be paid. Many people argue that these athletes do intact, deserve to be paid for their time and hard work. NCAA athletes create a name for themselves by playing and performing well on their college teams. The better these athletes perform, the more publicity the school revives. This then leads to higher ticket sales and stores around campus selling jerseys and other clothing items with athletes names and numbers on the back. NCAA schools have become comfortable with using athletes’ names to bring in a revenue for the school, and yet the athletes never see any of that money. On the other hand, many people believe that these athletes do not deserve, nor should they expect to receive payment in return. They believe that these scholarships and the education are payment in itself. Some even bring up the question on if it is affordable or even realistic to pay college athletes.

Intro- This topic has been debated for years now and people are starting to think it should become a mandatory thing. Should we pay college athletes for stuff like utilities and family? Many peoples position of this argument is that college athletes should get paid, but only to a certain extent. For example, pro athletes are getting paid millions a year. College athletes don’t need that much money because at this age they still might not know how to manage money properly. College athletes deserve at least seven to eight hundreded dollars.

Paying College athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association over the years. Many have strong opinions about this topic, and the opinions vary. The discussion of paying college athletes began in 1991 when the famed Fab Five became a household name in the United States. The Fab Five is arguably the greatest recruiting class of all time; all attending the same school (Baxter). The Fab Five first created controversy when they started to question why the university and university officials were making millions and millions of dollars off their names, and they were just deprived hungry college kids not making a dime. Nike even made billions by copyrighting their famed black athletic socks, black

College football players receive a lot of benefits by attending big name universities, especially if they’re on scholarship. Full football scholarships are given to the top athletes in the country, these scholarships include all their books, room and board, whole tuition paid for, and any sporting equipment needed. For some reason Division 1 football players still want more on top of everything previously stated. This is a pretty crazy argument due to all the “free” stuff that these big name athletes do get. Kain Colter, a former Northwestern university quarterback, filed a lawsuit against the NCAA describing the life of a college football player, describing it like a day of work.

The college themselves are making huge incomes from every game they do. All of these people are making money from someone else's hard work it would only be fair to give them some

College sports are one of the largest and fastest growing markets in today’s culture. With some college sports games attracting more viewers than their professional counterparts, the NCAA is one of the most profiting organizations in America. Recently there has been controversy in the world of college sports as to whether the college athletes that are making their universities and the NCAA money should receive payment while they are playing their respective sport. Many believe that these athletes should be paid. Others argue that they are already receiving numerous benefits for playing that sport from their universities. Many of the proponents of paying college athletes are current or former college athletes who believe their hard work and hours put into practice and competing go under appreciated. They feel that while the athletes are making the university money, the athletes do not receive any cut of these profits. Opponents feel that athletes already receive numerous perks and should not receive extra compensation on top of the perks they already receive.

Even though an additional $2,000 a semester does not seem like a lot of money, for some smaller market colleges this extra expense may create problems. That is why I suggest either requiring the NCAA itself to provide the extra money to the players or allowing the players to make money off of jersey sales, autograph signings, etc. By potentially taking this financial burden away from the schools and transferring it the NCAA you avoid putting undo stress on smaller schools and instead ask the NCAA, a multi-billion dollar industry, to barely dip into their huge expanse of funding/profit. Furthermore, the NCAA itself is considered a non-profit organization so instead of hoarding the billions of dollars a year that it earns it should be giving money back to the student-athletes who have made the NCAA what it is today (SOURCE). Even though many schools would not be able to pay student athletes the extra scholarship money many larger schools could easily provide this additional scholarship money. For instance, some schools already pay their head football coaches millions of dollars a year. One specific example of this is Alabama Head Football coach Nick Saban. Saban makes six million dollars a year and also receives other

College athletes are taken advantage of and deserve to be compensated for their services while playing sports. These students are exploited and used to make money and out of everything that particular school makes, the athlete never given a penny of it. All of the hard works, blood, sweat and tears that they put into that

Lastly, and the biggest reason I think student athletes should get paid is because if a student athlete is injured while playing or practicing, the university isn't liable or mandated to pay for the students medical bills. The way the law is written, because student athletes aren't paid they aren't considered employees and as such don't fall under workers compensation laws. This means something as small as a sprain, all the way up to being paralyzed could, cost wise, potentially fall on the shoulders of the

Universities should set money aside for each graduating athletic senior. They should get rewarded for playing all those years. A 5 year athlete would get the most money all the way down to the transfer students that only played one season and you wouldn’t give any money to the players that leave early because of drafts or transfers. The amount of money a school gives

First of all, college athletes are not getting paid for playing at universities. Many universities believe that students who receive athletic scholarships do not need any financial support because throughout these scholarships, students-athletes are able to receive the academic support programs they deserve as well as covering paid tuition. This benefit student athletes because they receive academic support, but what about their personal expenses? Universities should start to think about how they can support their students financially. If universities expect athletes to have high grades and a great grade point average why not give them an equal pay. These athletes spend over 20 hours per week practicing intensive workouts. Universities across the country are known for not paying their hard working athletes. This is the case of the Midwestern University. This university concluded that the players of their team did not have a job outside of their sport. When