Essay On Why Student Athletes Should Not Be Paid

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) makes roughly $1 billion in income annually and the athletes do not receive any of it. This topic has been debated for many years and is still being debated. The debate dates back to the 1980s and now athletes are demanding that they deserve to be paid since profits are made off of them. Some athletes such as former and current basketball and football players came together with lawsuits to federal courts asking for rewards from profits NCAA makes gets of them. Research has opened several different opinions on this matter. There are many pros and cons for paying college athletes. College sports provide a huge source of the university’s income. The athletes, however, receive their scholarship

College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes

Whether or not student-athletes should be paid has been a hotly debated topic since the 1900s. College athletes spend just as much time, if not more time, practicing and devoting time and energy to sports as they do academics. For this, many athletes are rewarded with scholarship money. However, many people believe it is not enough. Should we pay student-athletes a slice of the wealth or is a full-ride scholarship enough? (Business Insider). What if the athlete gets injured? Where does the money come out of to support each athlete’s salary? The huge amount of money being generated from college sports has led some people to think that the athletes are entitled to some of that revenue. While, some think that student-athletes should be paid, others disagree for various reasons.

College athletics are becoming more like the professional leagues except for one big issue, money. Student athletes bring in a vast amount of revenue for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) not to mention recognition and notoriety regarding the athlete’s university. However, the debate continues as to whether student athletes should or should not receive payment for playing college sports.

Paying College athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association over the years. Many have strong opinions about this topic, and the opinions vary. The discussion of paying college athletes began in 1991 when the famed Fab Five became a household name in the United States. The Fab Five is arguably the greatest recruiting class of all time; all attending the same school (Baxter). The Fab Five first created controversy when they started to question why the university and university officials were making millions and millions of dollars off their names, and they were just deprived hungry college kids not making a dime. Nike even made billions by copyrighting their famed black athletic socks, black

In the United States, college athletics are growing larger by the minute. College athletics contribute not only to the recognition of colleges and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), it also contributes to the income of colleges and the NCAA. Without student athletes, these colleges and the NCAA would not reap the benefits of college athletics, such as: increased awareness of colleges, higher application rates, and of course the revenue brought in from game and event tickets, apparel, and contracts for licensing and television rights. Since the student athletes, who devote a great deal of time to their sport, are the cog in the machine that is the NCAA and college athletics, they deserve the fair and rightful compensation that they certainly do not currently receive. Here is exactly why student athletes in the NCAA should be compensated for what they do for their colleges, on and off the field of play.

College Athletes Should Get Paid College athletes have gained so much popularity in the last decade. College athletes should get paid because the NCAA is an eleven billion dollar industry, the payment would give the athlete a little more than just a degree, and it would help the athlete learn how to manage money. This paper will attempt to answer the question if college athletes should be paid by exploring the reasons for and against the payment of college athletes. Colleges and universities provided really strong educations however college isn't cheap and even with a scholarship it's not free. The "full ride" scholarship can only pay for books, room, board, fees and tuition, and according to CBS News only two percent of college athletes

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was founded by President Roosevelt in 1905. The college organization was first recognized as a league, the NCAA committed to the idea of not providing athletes’ with a salary who took part in the organization. The NCAA is based off the idea of amateurism, and this was a notable idea at the time. According to U.S. News, the NCAA is no longer compatible to what the league use to be. The NCAA brings around around eleven billion every year for the organization as a whole (“Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid?”). Coaches and administrators make a large sum of money, but the players receive no monetary compensation they seem to be the main focus of college sports, Without the athletes there is no NCAA league.

Does it make sense for colleges to run a multimillion dollar entertainment business? The idea of paying college athletes has increased in popularity in recent years. People believe that the athletes should get compensated for their time and money they make for their schools. It may seem like a legitimate argument, but paying college athletes are not why schools are built. Instead, colleges should focus more on educating students and athletes.

Not paying college athletes is by far the right decision. This has been largely debated for years and both hold valid arguments for each side. The majority of the people who want to see them get paid are the players and those on the other side of the argument are those who are not involved in the sport. The reason they should not be paid is the money will ruin the game if it gets involved. It is highly likely players will focus more about money than winning and could easily be distracted.

It is absolutely unheard of that in any organization in the United States where the most important people behind everything only make 13% percent of the total revenue.That is the case for NCAA Division 1 athletes. Many argue that college athletes are awarded and pretty much paid through the full scholarships the NCAA provides. In all sports the NCAA provides $1.4 billion dollars in scholarships a year. 1.4 billion dollars is a staggering amount of money, but in this industry it makes up only just around 13% of the total revenue of the NCAA a year. More specifically, division 1 college basketball and football create $6 billion of the $10.6 billion. In return, they are awarded only $493 in scholarships. This creates a jaw

College football players receive a lot of benefits by attending big name universities, especially if they’re on scholarship. Full football scholarships are given to the top athletes in the country, these scholarships include all their books, room and board, whole tuition paid for, and any sporting equipment needed. For some reason Division 1 football players still want more on top of everything previously stated. This is a pretty crazy argument due to all the “free” stuff that these big name athletes do get. Kain Colter, a former Northwestern university quarterback, filed a lawsuit against the NCAA describing the life of a college football player, describing it like a day of work.

Many argue that college athletes should not be paid because attending America’s top universities on scholarship is payment enough. People wonder where the money to pay these athletes is going to come from. Many schools do not have the money in their budgets to operate without student fees and investors, so finding the money to pay hundred or thousands of athletes would throw many budgets out of balance. Students question the equality of a student to a student athlete. Student athletes even question how equal individual sports are. Kristi Dosh of SportsMoney magazine questions, “How much do you pay players? Is it one set amount for every athlete no matter what the sport or the school in order to keep things fair?” (Dosh 2). There are nearly 460,000 college athletes active today, and it would be very difficult for the NCAA to decide how to pay a Division III cross-country runner versus a Division I football star.

The NCAA is a billion dollar corporation that is allowed to rake in its profit off the backs of unpaid college athletes. According to freelance journalist, and Robin Goldstein Award for Outstanding Regional Reporting, Reed Karaim, “…broadcasters pay the top college football conferences more than $200 million each annually, with each team in some conferences receiving $20 million or more” (Karaim). Because the college athletes at these schools are refused to be seen as anything but amateurs by the NCAA, the money gained from in game revenues never sees its way into the player’s hands. Rather, these Division I programs spend this money paying coaches

It is an age old debate on whether a college athlete should be paid. It is a high school student 's dream to play sports at the collegiate level. Many people question why the NCAA, coaches, and administrators are allowed to earn large amounts of money while the student athlete’s hard work and efforts are limited to a scholarship. Others feel that is should be considered a privilege that a college athlete can earn a college degree while enjoying what they love, by playing collegiate sports. Student athletes should not receive payment because they are already receiving payment in the form of an expensive athletic scholarship and are also able to receive the new cost of attendance stipend to assist with further financial burdens.