Morgan,
I felt the exact same way prior to reading these articles. I never really thought about the controversy surrounding this topic. I agree with you that athletes should only receive one form of payment, but I feel that salaries would allow for better distribution of revenue. Overall, I really liked Joe Nocera’s article because I agreed with several of his points. I don’t feel that athletes are compensated adequately for their “jobs” either and I really like his point about how “all the money they are generating trickles up to everyone else in the system.” I really enjoyed that you brought up the point from Rick Burton’s article about the “private tutors, skill-position coaches, PR specialists, conditioning experts, and doctors.” I really never thought about all of the added benefits that athletes receive prior to reading these articles, but I don’t agree with the fact that all athletes (Division I, Division II, Division II, etc) receive those benefits. Division I athletes have a lot more benefits in comparison to other athletes. I don’t think that other teams are any less talented or hard working either, but I know from
…show more content…
Although I don’t feel that other athletes are any less talented or hard working, I believe that Division I athletes should be paid much more due to the amount of revenue they bring into their program. As I stated in my response, Ohio State football players only receive about 12% of the revenue from their football program, which is why I feel that athletes should be paid salaries instead of scholarships. Each individual university and team should be assigned salary caps based on revenue and I think that bonuses aren’t a bad idea either. For example, if a team makes it to the finals or wins a championship, those athletes should receive more money. Overall, I think that salaries are a good
How have sports changed to the point where there is serious discussion around paying college athletes? Universities and athletic coaches make millions on the backs of their players. So the question is, are our college athletes properly compensated? After reading both articles by Paul Marx and Warren Hartenstine I have come to the conclusion that college athletes should not be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Many students are fully compensated for tuition, room and board, books and private tutors. These services are valuable in countless ways. They allow students to pursue both their athletic and academic dreams. Further compensating college athletes would lead to an unfair advantage and is unjust to other students.
Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is able to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. These rules have long been challenged, however no changes have been made by the NCAA. With universities grossing close to $200 million a year college athletics has turned into one of the top industries in the world. The NCAA is a governing body of college athletics, but without people questioning the NCAA and demanding changes to the monopoly that the NCAA is nothing will happen to the unfairness to college athletes like it is currently.
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes
The NCAA is an organization of 1,200 member schools/ universities that have banded together to form the rules of college sports. The NCAA head office enforces these stringent and mostly unnecessary rules for the sake of maintaining the extremely high salaries of coaches and athletic directors. Because many athletes can't afford necessities like food, the colleges and/ or the NCAA must reform their “code of amateurism” so that players may receive compensation for their play. Many proponents of the NCAA and opposes of “pay for play” (paying student athletes for their play) often make the argument that if athletes don't want to go to college, they don't have to.
According to Horace Mitchell “collegiate athletes are students receiving access to a college education through their participation in sports.” Yes, but it’s not like they are VIP's. Most athletes still have to pay for some of their tuition and all athletes have to go to class. They do everything a non-athlete would do but, they have more stress upon them because they have to maintain a B average in order to play their sport. Athletes are under a tremendous amount of pressure not only from their sport but from keeping up with their studies also. All of that hard work deserves a
College athletics have been incredibly profitable businesses for many years. With the advent of televised sporting events, the profit margin has increased exponentially. The Texas Longhorns’ football program alone grosses 104 million dollars annually (forbes.com). So, where is all that money going? Most of it goes right back to the school. The athletes who practice for endless hours and devote their lives to the sports get nothing but the satisfaction of winning. So, should Division One college athletes be paid? Division One athletes should be paid because they generate a significant amount of revenue for the school.
College sports bring in a lot of money every year on the major school level. These programs receive millions of dollars per year to the universities and schools and the players get nothing. These are the same players who are putting their lives and futures on the line for the university each and every day and cannot get a small token of appreciation. That is not fair for the student. Today as much money that comes in and out of sports, college athletes should receive some sort of compensation for playing for their school because it is not easy being a student-athlete.
If college athletes were to start being paid, many questions would start to surface. The big question that would pop up first is, “What sports get paid?” Statistics show that football and basketball are the major revenue sports that actually make money for their universities, while most other college sports do not. While football brings in on average the most revenue, basketball is close to second. Another question that may be asked is, “How will the money be split?” Like many others, the writer believes that the biggest question lies in which areas of competition would get paid. Famous Fab Five member Jalen Rose states that, “Every student athlete should be paid $2000 a year” (Salvador). However, if you do that, in fairness, would one pay a star football player and a star rowing team member the same amount of money? Or would a woman athlete get paid just as much as a male athlete? If this not the case then it becomes extremely unfair and would just cause controversy. Fairness is important when coming to this, especially the fairness between females and males. There are several different questions that need to be reviewed and that proves why college athletes should not be paid. It would cause absolute chaos and a plethora
Many people preach that it's time to pay college players and that players should be paid because of how much money they make for their organizations over the years among other reasons like,hours invested, corruption prevention and teaching athletes how to manage money. There's more than just the money made that convinces me that college athletes should be paid , but how much exactly? The opposition would make tons of arguments Such as, financial irresponsibility, lack of maturity, its by choice, where the funding will go?. These are just a few points that I feel best argue the paying of collegiate athletes is the better option of the two. When earning an athletic scholarship it’s not as if all your day-to day responsibilities disappear, from
This is how it should be college athletes should not be getting paid for playing. Colleges are already giving them a free education, and opportunities to succeed later in life, and division one colleges are non profit. Many colleges offer students that are involved with sports scholarships that pay for the price of emission (Whitlock 3). College athletes should not be getting paid if they are getting thousands of dollars in scholarships to go play that sport in college. The amount of money people think college athletes should be paid does not even begin to
Your dream has come true; you're at college playing the sport you love, and at what cost? None. You are free to live your college life worry free and have been given the opportunity to continue your sports career. After you have completed your college education you can get a job, with no college loans that you have to pay off. You are also able to start making money right out of graduation. You get to experience this less stressful college life. The lives of athletes that walk-on and athletes not on a scholarship are stressful ones with many different things to worry about. Those athletes have to worry about how to pay for college and the loans they will have to pay back after graduation. They will have to pay for all their meals, books and the cost for dorms. But what got you here? There were many factors, but one that helped you the most was that you were a diverse athlete.
Kids grow up loving to play sports in their free time. They never get paid to play when they are at a young age. They do it for the love of the game and for the need for competition. This is the way that it is in college right now. College athletes compete with all their hearts to be the best they can for their schools. They don’t get paid a cent. It has been a common debate if that is the right way to do it. Should it be that college athletes do not deserve to get paid for playing a sport? It should not be this way. College athletes certainly should get paid to play.
College athletes should be paid because of the hard work, dedication and effort they put into their respective sports. These athletes are a major source of income for their schools and they are not receiving a penny for it. These college athletes deserved to be paid, colleges are using these athletes to get money and they are never given anything but a pat on the back and a good job. College athletes work and train extremely hard to perform at the highest level possible. In most cases, they spend more time training and preparing for their sport than they actually do learning and studying. They put so much on the line to play and they get nothing in return. These college athletes literally make their schools millions of dollars every
College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes
College athletes are finally getting attention on the fact that they are not paid. I believe that whether or not it is college or pro sports they deserve a salary. These players put their heart and soul on the field and get nothing in return. In the articles “Athletes New Day” by Paul Marx and “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid” by Warren Hartenstine, the reasons for college athletes to be paid are very evident. No matter the case, if the students move on to pro sports or not after college, they should be entitled to some pay for their contributions. College athletes deserve to be compensated for their playtime in these sports, sales of products with their name on it, and even compensation for their injuries.