Essay Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes

The NCAA makes more than a billion dollars during March Madness each year due to all the sponsors and other advertising. College Athletes need to be paid because an average they practice up to five days a week during the season and also have lots of training in the offseason. Plus they have to attend school every day which gives college athletes no time to actually have a full functioning job to be able to buy groceries and other expenses. The athletes only have their scholarship to use for other payments if they have one and maybe there parents aren’t able to pay for their apartments and other expenses. So they could use some extra money on the side.

The question whether “If college athletes should get paid or not?” has been debated for many years. The debate is brought up every year during the NCAA men’s basketball, March Madness competition, and starts again when football season begins. College athletes do provide entertainment for sports fans, but all the benefits that they do receive should limit them from being paid. The benefits student athletes obtain is free tuition, health coverage, and an opened opportunity for their future.

There is an issue that continues to grow with college athletes; should college athletes should be financially compensated? Many argue that college athletes are amateurs, and should not be paid, as they receive compensation in the form of education. Others believe that these athletes produce large revenue for their schools, and the athletic sponsoring body, and therefore should be paid for doing so. There are many limitations on college athletes from the NCAA and from the school which they play for. These athletes are strictly forbidden from receiving gifts, monetary compensation or royalties for use of their likeness (Marx 474-75). The NCAA, an organization founded to control violence in college sports, keeps these strong regulations as a way to reinforce that college sports are ameteur sports . To allow college players to be financially compensated many things would have to change, including the NCAA admitting that these are professional athletes. The NCAA would have to change their regulations, and schools would have to determine a pay structure for these athletes. This is a change that should occur, but with some stipulations.

Should College Athletes Be Paid? This question has the propensity to cause much commotion within the various collegiate athletic divisions; e.g., NCAA, BIG 10, MEAC, and CIAA. The complexity involved in flushing out an answer to this question coupled with our status as college students may have played a direct influence in the decision of the group Long Term Money’s (L.T.M.) choice to use this topic as an interest for group assignment. A “student athlete” is a participant in an organized competitive sport sponsored by the educational institution in which he or she is enrolled. Student athletes must typically balance the roles of being a full-time student and a full-time athlete. Due to educational institutions being colleges, they offer athletic scholarships in various sports; therefore, the proverbial question of which came first, “the chicken or the egg?” comes to mind. Are the individuals who would be directly affected by such an action, considered students’ firsts, or athletes, and if they are athletes, should be they be considered employees governed by significant employment and labor laws eligible for pay? If they are now employee, how will this affect their pursuit of the educational process, eligibility for scholarships, classes, study, etc.; what changes that must take place for the plan (if granted) to be carried out, would it be consistent across the entire country. So, with so many unanswered questions, we ask again; “Should College Athletes Be

Throughout the years many schools have been caught paying their athletes money when they are not allowed to. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, or the NCAA, makes billions of dollars every year because of the popularity of their sports.When the school has a successful season they are making millions of dollars and as a result, some schools are breaking the rules and they are trying to pay players and recruits to entice them to come to their school so they can make even more money. This has lead to a corrupt system and has many people asking whether it would be better to just pay college athletes or not.

There are about 325.7 million people in the United States of America, 400,000 of those people are college athletes, that’s 12.3%. Along with that, 1 out of every 25 of those college athletes will become a professional, that’s 16,000 athletes (.5% of America’s population). Due to the slim possibilities of even becoming a college athlete, college athletes should be compensated because of the support their families need financially, the revenue they bring in for their school, and the sacrifices they must make for their team.

Imagine this you get a scholarship to play for a college sports team. This team is you job, you train all day, you practice, and you play. But you find yourself coming home without money for gas, snacks, and your other needs because this job that you're putting in at least 40 hours a week, isn’t earning you a paycheck. There's been a huge debate on paying college athletes. Many believe that they should be paid because they put in all the effort, spend all their time, and earn all the money the National Collegiate Athletic Association is receiving. College players should be paid because there the ones who bring the money to the schools sometimes more than their scholarship is worth.

There has always been a big controversial debate on whether college athletes should receive some type of compensation for playing Division one sports. Many college teams pile up huge revenue from football games, basketball games, and many other different sports. Although the university piles up huge amounts of that money, not one penny goes towards any of the athletes. Even though they’re the reason why universities are getting rich from all the money the sports have obtained, the revenue that usually comes from game tickets, sponsorships, and booster clubs. Also college athletics have a huge popularity among Americans over the past few years, more American have turned their heads to watching collegiate sports rather than watching professional sports, to the fact that its way more exciting. This has resulted into increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the other colleges that’s participating with this, in this case the debate of whether college athletes should be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Student athletes have worked hard, have dedicated themselves to the sport and also sacrificed their own time for the sport they love.

College athletes make billions for their schools, but only get a scholarships in return. Adele Birkenes, a fellow student states that “College football and men’s basketball generate revenues of more than $6 billion every year. Yet not one penny goes toward paying the people who make the sports possible: the student athletes.” (7) With the long practices the athletes put in, and all of the game film they have to watch on top of their homework, it is like doing two jobs at once and they should get more than a scholarship in return. The players will be left with something after college instead of just a ring or a goodbye. (Pay to

I believe college athletes should be able to be paid more than just a scholarship for different reasons. College athletics have gained immensely in popularity among many different Americans over the past couple of decades. Most of these athletes work countless hours all year around for these colleges with different off season workouts. Which means it’s more than just a part-time job for these athletes. Fans must understand that college sports is big business and the business is booming for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). If the NCAA didn't have these top elite athletes on the field or on the court nobody would come to the games and there will not be such an increased revenues for the NCAA. College athletes should get paid because they work countless hours and with making the National Collegiate Athletic Association close to billions each year that they don't see any of besides in scholarships.

If someone puts in 40+ hours of weekly practice time and receives no money for the hard work they have done, are they being cheated? The amount of work that college athletes dedicate to their athletic programs is equivalent to working a full time job, the difference is that the athletes are being left without a paycheck. Student-athletes who are on full athletic scholarships are still left with approximately $3000 in out of pocket expenses (NCPA). How are they supposed to pay for these funds when their time is completely consumed by the sport? The NCAA runs a monopoly, taking advantage of student-athletes to produce millions of dollars; robbing them under the disguise of amateurism (NCPA).

In my previous essay, I chose to address one of the biggest debates in collegiate sports; should college athletes be paid. For decades now school administers, alumni, boosters, and student athletes have been torn between the two sides, and I, for one, am in agreement with the idea of student athletes be compensated financially for all their time and dedication to their respectable sport. As you can imagine, there are many who oppose the idea, but as I stated in my previous essay there are great benefits for allowing student-athletes to be compensated. However, this is easier said than done. Deriving to a solution that fairly compensates all student athletes on every level of competition is no small feat, and will possibly take a few years of deliberation before actually being implemented. In this essay, I will make attempt in providing solutions on how student athlete can be compensated for their hard work. My proposal will include what actions need to be done first, and by whom could assist in the issue. Along with my resolutions, I will provide financial statistics to give support to my proposal and the realness of how compensating college athletes can actually be made possible.

I believe college athletes should be paid for using their talents to the will of their college and the NCAA. All athletes that participate in college sports fall into a stereotype of false beliefs. People across the country believe that just because a person receives a scholarship to play a sport it means that all of their classes and food is payed for, in full, and they require no assistance to pay for other expenses. In reality, this idea that players have everything paid for is very inaccurate. While Division one sports like football and basketball, most players on scholarship do earn full rides to live on campus and attend for free.

¨I need more money¨, as my brother yelled as I was walking into his dorm room to visit him. He looked aggravated and tired while he was surrounded by papers on his bed that looked like bills. The next five hours were spent trying to make a plan for the next three years to pay for him to go to college. In the United States, college athletes should be paid for playing because they should get a reward they are putting their lives life in danger, and itś a way to pay for college.