Essay Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

College athletes should not be paid to play the given sport they participate in. And as of right now, this statement stands true for the most part but is starting to become blurred and pushed extremely hard for. Over the years the NCAA and other organizations have had many conventions and uproars over the subject of whether or not college athletes should or should not be paid. The main two sports that this debate come up in are men's college basketball and college football, especially during march madness and the college football national championship. Now, I respect anyone who puts in the time, work, and excitement college athletics bring to the world or sports, but they should not be paid.

The first reason why college athletes should get paid is that colleges / NCAA and coaches have enough money to pay the college athletes. The NCAA/college have many deals that bring billions of dollars in. the coaches also get paid millions of dollars from colleges over many years. For example “ As a result of the basketball game between Indiana and North Carolina in the sixteenth round, the players will not get any financial reward for winning the game. Instead, the coaches will get bonuses.

One of the most popular pastimes in America is watching college sports. Whether it’s football, baseball, or basketball, these student-athletes bring fans, money, and sponsorships to their schools. So why shouldn't these athletes be paid? The answer is that student-athletes should not be paid, because they have the ability to earn scholarships or financial aid, college athletes are paid in other ways than financially, and not all schools have the money to pay them. Ultimately, paying college athletes would ruin the current culture and competitiveness of college sports.

Although college players don't get paid I contend they should because sometimes full ride scholarships to college are not enough they should get paid for playing as well because they work more than the average american a week, entertaining the fans and doing the hard work. The NCAA makes a lot of money from their collegiate sports. Yet college players don’t get paid and they are the ones playing the sport and entering the fans. This is unfair to the players. This why college players should get paid and the NCAA should pay them.

Paying College athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association over the years. Many have strong opinions about this topic, and the opinions vary. The discussion of paying college athletes began in 1991 when the famed Fab Five became a household name in the United States. The Fab Five is arguably the greatest recruiting class of all time; all attending the same school (Baxter). The Fab Five first created controversy when they started to question why the university and university officials were making millions and millions of dollars off their names, and they were just deprived hungry college kids not making a dime. Nike even made billions by copyrighting their famed black athletic socks, black

about getting a part time job. So they would have more time working on their sport and would have energy for classes. The athletes would not have to worry where they would get their money if the NCAA paid its athletes. If the athletes do not have to worry where they are going to get their money from, then could could spend more time perfecting their game and would also help them have more energy to do well in their classes too (“Top 10 Reasons College…”). These would also lead them to be more competitive towards whatever sport they are playing because they have more energy to work for it. When someone have been working all day one something, they usually tired right? Well this is the exact scenario for college athletes every single day. The

Pay for play is not the answer. Ever since 1996 when Ed Martin was caught giving money to Webber, Maurice Taylor, Robert Traylor, and Louis Bullock. 4 out 5 of the starters for the Michigan state woverwrings basketball team. Since this high ranking officials in the NCAA have been discussing if they are obligated to pay the athletes, the answer has always been the same the college athletes can not be paid by anyone for their service on the field.

In addition, paying college athletes will result in greed so it is best to not pay them. Athletes are motivated to play and try their best in each game to earn scholarships. If NCAA start paying them then it will

Studies show that during the March Madness tournament in 2015, the NCAA made $800 million and none of the players received anything from that amount. Many people believe Division I college athletes shouldn’t be paid because of most of them already receiving full scholarships and many benefits. What they don’t know is these student athletes give so much to their schools and do not receive equally back. Arguers also have no knowledge of how much time these student athletes spend on training for their sport and working in school. Out of football, baseball and basketball it was found that the Division I student athletes train for their sport on an average about 40 hours per week.

Imagine this you get a scholarship to play for a college sports team. This team is you job, you train all day, you practice, and you play. But you find yourself coming home without money for gas, snacks, and your other needs because this job that you're putting in at least 40 hours a week, isn’t earning you a paycheck. There's been a huge debate on paying college athletes. Many believe that they should be paid because they put in all the effort, spend all their time, and earn all the money the National Collegiate Athletic Association is receiving. College players should be paid because there the ones who bring the money to the schools sometimes more than their scholarship is worth.

Your dream has come true; you're at college playing the sport you love, and at what cost? None. You are free to live your college life worry free and have been given the opportunity to continue your sports career. After you have completed your college education you can get a job, with no college loans that you have to pay off. You are also able to start making money right out of graduation. You get to experience this less stressful college life. The lives of athletes that walk-on and athletes not on a scholarship are stressful ones with many different things to worry about. Those athletes have to worry about how to pay for college and the loans they will have to pay back after graduation. They will have to pay for all their meals, books and the cost for dorms. But what got you here? There were many factors, but one that helped you the most was that you were a diverse athlete.

Paying student athletes has become a growing disputation among college athletes in recent years. College athletes have gained immense popularity among Americans over the past few decades. This has resulted into increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and its participating colleges. This often fuels the ongoing debate of whether college athletes should be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Because of the amount of income student athletes bring into schools, student athletes should be paid based on the amount of success, revenue, and popularity they bring to the school.

The idea that college level student athletes should be paid has been receiving close review in the last few years. Proponents to the idea of paying student athletes argue that competing at such a high level interferes with academics and that they deserve to be paid; however, the athletes themselves are the ones who decided to undertake the tremendous commitment that comes with playing sports in college. They should not be paid because they are already being paid in the form of scholarships, and paying student athletes would damage the integrity of the sport as a whole. Furthermore, paying athletes that participate in profitable sports may take away from other, less profitable sports.

College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes

It is an age old debate on whether a college athlete should be paid. It is a high school student 's dream to play sports at the collegiate level. Many people question why the NCAA, coaches, and administrators are allowed to earn large amounts of money while the student athlete’s hard work and efforts are limited to a scholarship. Others feel that is should be considered a privilege that a college athlete can earn a college degree while enjoying what they love, by playing collegiate sports. Student athletes should not receive payment because they are already receiving payment in the form of an expensive athletic scholarship and are also able to receive the new cost of attendance stipend to assist with further financial burdens.