Essentialist Theory Of The Queer Theory

Richard Blanco’s list poem, “Queer Theory: According to my Grandmother” explores the relationship between a boy and his grandmother. Readers are forced to notice that Blanco repeats the phrase, “I’ve seen you” multiple times. This raises the question as to why Blanco puts emphasis on that specific remark. Blanco repeats the phrase, “I’ve seen you” to affirm that the grandmother knows her grandson is gay. While she most likely has not seen her grandson do some things on her forbidden list, she says she has to make her grandson more aware of his actions. This is in an attempt to shelter the grandson from the criticism of others. The grandmother resolves with accepting her grandson’s sexuality, but wanting to protect him from society’s negative views.

Conviction for being a homosexual in Ukraine does not render our client ineligible for refugee claim in Canada

The functionalist theory and the symbolic interactionist theory in regards to sexulity and sexual orientation are vastly different. The functionalist theory perspective is that our society upholds heterosexuality as the normative and ideal behavior. This is also known as institutionalized heterosexuality. The symbolic interactionist perspective is that sexual orientation is a time bound and culturally specific social invention. Heterosexuality is something that we as a society think of as unchanging, consistent, and universal. Homosexuality is a “master status,” an identity that determines how others view them and how they view themself. These two perspectives help us understand the social problem that is inequality in the LGBT+ community

Everyone has their own take on controversial subjects faced in society, and no matter what age we live in, this particular subject seems to stay just as relevant in the generation before as it does today. The poem written by Richard Blanco titled â Queer Theory: According to My Grandmotherâ (2012), which

According to Eve Sedgwick,the definition of heterosexism is a series of assumptions that lead to the conclusion that all aspects of a person’s sexuality can be deduced by their biological sex alone. These assumptions relate to what sexualities are considered “normal”. In the text “Making Gay Meaning” Sedgwick lists several of these assumptions including that a person’s gender presentation and identities are “supposed” to match their biological sex, a person’s sexual partner’s perception as gay or straight is supposed to match their own, and that a person’s perception as gay or straight is supposed to correspond with the biological sex of that person and their sexual partner(s).

Sexual minority is defined “as individuals with the same sex attractions or behavior, regardless of self-identifications” (Sanders, 2013) Etiology turned the focus to biology, therefore different arguments from various sources including scientist argues that it could be a biological reasoning why an individual might prefer the same sex. However, there is “no evidence to conclude their cause” (Sanders, 2013)

Thirdly, queers challenge the categories as well as binaries of sexual and gender by questioning the categories and binaries’ reasonability. Queer theorists concern about how and why the categories of gender and sexuality are shaped, thinking the main reason is to better control people so as to achieve political goals. As de Lauretis (1991) stated, the existing strategies of homosexual, which is created based on the existing categories of gender and sexuality, is to ensure the “ center” integrated. Moreover, they reject and question the usefulness of categories. According to

Theoretical Approach The theoretical approach to utilize for this research is the Strengths or Resiliency Perspective. The strength and resiliency theoretical approach will guide the research in gathering information that identifies elements to support the overall viewpoint and perspective of the LGBT community. According to Marsiglia and Kulis "The strengths perspective is based on the belief that human beings have the inherent capacity to grow and change, even under adverse conditions.

Normally, it has been discovered that heteros who accept sexual minority status is naturally decided and unchanging hold more great mentalities toward sexual minorities, than the individuals who see it as uninhibitedly picked or learnt (e.g., Aguero, Block, and Byrne, 1984; Haslam and Levy, 2006; Haslam, Rothschild and Ernst, 2002; Hegarty and Pratto, 2001; Jayaratne et al., 2006; Whitley, 1990). Given the inescapable ness of homophobic disgrace and segregation, and the ensuing battles numerous LGB individuals confront in tolerating their sexuality, sexual introduction convictions may hold profound individual criticalness for some LGB people. Many additionally hold hostile to essentialist convictions, keeping up that sexual introduction is

Spade reveals that some institutions ought to be embraced while others should be rejected due to what he terms as fake intentions by them to the marginalized groups. Evidently, issues faced by intersex people and people with other disabilities continue to raise questions, with many of studies showing that discrimination and violence still take center stage in most of these individuals’

Heteronormativity. When you announce that word to a group of people, you will most likely be met with blank stares. It may be a bit of a mouthful, but it is a topic becoming more of an issue in our society, and one I wish to acknowledge. To put it simply, heteronormativity is the belief that everyone falls into complementary genders (man and woman to you and me) with roles in life, and within these roles heterosexuality is the only acceptable sexual orientation. This pigeonholing exists in all parts of life, but let us turn our attention to school; that blissful utopia where opinions about what is acceptable begin to form. Allow me, then, to take you back through time to your first day of school: trembling and quivering you sit on a colourful carpet and your teacher begins to read...

(A) Essentialism is the theory or idea that social phenomena are natural, inevitable, universal and biologically determined, (Lecture 4, Slide 4). Meaning that a person’s phenomenon has an underlying and unchanging essence. There are two different types of essentialism, the first being evolutionary and this would be that a person right now and how they are made is due to gradual genetic changes, natural selection or sexual selections. And the second type is proximate causes, this is the hormonal difference, genetic differences and physiological differences. Since essentialism means that everything is natural for a person the sexual drive would be an innate result of the need to procreate, meaning that everyone would be heterosexual since this sex drive is natural. Sexual categories are genetic

Queer Theory houses the analytical tools used to examine what is “normal” and “abnormal,” primarily through deconstructing issues of sexuality in society. Its value comes from the fact that is more than just researching homosexual lives; it is research/theorizing why/how/when lives are homosexualized, “queered” outside of the norm.2

“But aren’t you straight? Why are you so obsessed with gay sex?” many have asked. Why, indeed? But how is one’s sexual orientation relevant to one’s fascination with homoeroticism? More importantly, why did people have the urge to ask such question? Are they perhaps feeling threatened by the mere thought of a heterosexual woman who simply enjoys homoerotic fantasies? Many people are confused and sometimes disturbed by a suggestion of an idea that does not fit in the realm of heteronormativity or something out of “the norm”.

In Foucault and Queer Theory Spargo defines queer theory as a nebulous group of cultural criticism and analysis of social power structures relating to sexuality . It is these power structures and aspects of culture that are responsible for the discourse that creates and informs ones understanding of gender, race, and sexuality. However these aspects of identity do not exist separately from one another, but are constructed in tandem throughout history. These layers of identity inform each other in a way that is difficult if not impossible to separate. They do not act independently with an additive effect but intersect constructing their own unique set of experiences and perspectives. In this paper I will be exploring queer theory