Ethan Couch Case Study

Michael J. Mooney, a writer for D Magazine, claims, “after three days of testimony, Judge Jean Boyd sentenced Ethan, the spoiled boy who had wrought such pain and destruction, not to prison, but to time in a cushy California rehab and 10 years of probation.” In other words, the judge, Jean Boyd, believes that because of Ethan Couch’s mental condition affluenza he does not deserve jail time but instead deserved the help of a lavish rehab center in California and ten years of probation. I do not agree with this even though some say he did not know any better after the neglect from his parents and their lack to punish Ethan for his wrong doing creating the chaos that took place on June 15, 2013. Ethan Couch should still be held accountable for the death of four people and the permanent injury of two

Answer: The outcome from this type of court ruling was that Ethan is under heavy supervision for the next 10 years.I known this because on the second page paragraph 8-9 it states “District judge Jean Boyd has not publicly explained the reason behind the decision not to send Ethan to jail.According to the local newspaper,the judge said Ethan's parents could afford to pay for better

Her boyfriend took his eyes off of his road for a second and they are hit by an oncoming car. Deena ends up with permanent paralysis and her boyfriend is killed. The person who smashed into Deena’s car was another high schooler headed to the prom. The one difference is that the driver of that car was drinking while driving. The driver of this car was 17 years old. Does that really make a difference? Absolutely not. No matter what age, if a crime is committed, a consequence need to be put into action. Let’s flip the story though. Instead of a 17 year old driving drinking, let’s make it a 30 year old. Now, when this case hits the news, everyone will be so sorrowful towards the victims and want to punish the 30 year old, but when the 17 year old faces the consequences, it looks like the system is messed up, right? Wrong. Absolutely, utterly wrong. There is nothing wrong with the system, just the imbeciles that enter it.

Jaime Arellano was only sixteen when he decided to get behind the wheel intoxicated, which in return led to the death of a pregnant woman and her unborn child. In 2007, his case was immediately moved to the adult court of Texas where he was sentenced 20 years in prison. Jaime Arellano, is a Mexican immigrant, which in itself is considered to be in society in the “lowest of standings”. A formerly high school dropout with no money to pay for a highly credibly attorney, the state assigned him one. The attorney could not possibly argue his client’s innocence due to any psychological reasons such as “afluenza”, which resulted in a plea deal of 20 years instead of the 50 he was facing. On the other hand, we have the “afluenza teen” Ethan Couch, who in 2013, killed twice the

In Jeannette Walls's, The Glass Castle, we learn of a family's struggles and Jeannette's life growing up as she traveled across the country under unbelievable circumstances. Most of the time, Jeannette, Brian, and Lori, were left to take care of their mom and alcoholic father, including their baby sister Maureen, and lastly each other. Through these sibling's many hardships, they face many challenges moving and constantly trying to control their father’s alcoholic temper. For centuries many families have fell victims to alcohol abuse leaving them scarred and traumatized. In 2012 over 100,000 cases of crime have gone under the category of drunk driving .

When the Judge announced the verdict “Guilty” there was a slight murmur in the court room as was expected. Then the Judge began to announce the sentence “Life in prison without the possibility of parole”, the words cutting through the air like an arrow through a paper target. The courtroom was an arena of mixed feelings, half cheering in a celebratory manner, the other half crying and shouting in disbelief. Someone’s 13 year old son was going to prison for the rest of his life without any chance of parole. Children should never be sentenced to life without parole, making the sentence in

If local officials were notified that there was a young homeless teen with psychiatric problems roaming the streets maybe this incident could have been prevented. Trina was traumatized by the boys’ death The mother and prosecutor argued that Trina had an intend to killed the young boys. If Trina lawyer had paperwork to prove Trina’s psychological incompetence the courts could’ve dropped the case or have it moved to juvenile court. Leaving Trina eligible to be given the harshest sentence available. Trina was given a life sentence for an unintended crime illustrated the inequality of the justice system

On October 3, 2012, five young men decide to skip school and burglarize a home being the young naive children that they are. Four of the five young men entered the home under the impression that the home was empty but unfortunately for them, the homeowner was home and was armed. Being startled, the homeowner grabbed his weapon and began to fire at the intruders of his home. Two of the four boys were shot and one of them was killed (Drizin and Keller). Because they were committing a felony when their friend was killed, they were charged with his death. These four boys became victims of the felony murder law. They were given sentences ranging from 45 to 55 years. The sentences that these boys received were completely unjust and extreme for their actions. They should only be charged with the crime that they committed because they were not old enough to understand the consequences of their actions, they did not commit a murder, and they did not receive a fair trial.

I remember being eight years old and looking out the window; my heart was heavy as I examined the giant crushed piece of metal sitting in my driveway. It looked as if a herd of thousand horses trampled viciously on top of my mom’s maroon colored Jeep Cherokee. It was clear to see my dad was drinking and driving again. All too often drivers decide to put their keys in the ignition, start the car, and head off onto public roads, despite the fact that their motor abilities and mental judgement has been impaired from drinking alcohol. Drinking and driving is a devastating crime that affects the lives of many. When people decide to drink and drive, they are at risk of getting their license suspended, getting

Not every DWI (driving while intoxicated) case ends the same, some have different verdicts in the courtroom. The Ethan Couch case is a great example of why punishing drunk drivers should be more enforced and not so lenient. The teen from Texas was driving drunk with two other passengers in his pickup truck on June of 2013, when he hit and killed four people. Ethan Couch was tried as a juvenile and charged with four counts of Intoxication Manslaughter, but was only sentenced to ten years of probation. His lawyers argued that it was due to “affluenza”, which means that he came from a wealthy family and it prevented him from understanding what was right from wrong, so he was not held accountable for his actions. The judge who took on this case

This case is about feelings of entitlement among an affluent youth which creates a social problem in the community. Ethan Anthony Couch is a teenager who injured people and killed others while driving drunk. The blame and excuse for the defendant’s reckless action was placed on his wealthy upbringing and privileges given to him by his parents. Because of this social status and the fact that his parents never set limitations for him the teen was allowed to avoid a jail sentence. The judge gave Couch a person who was driving while under the influence of alcohol and other mind altering drugs probation instead of prison. After his attorney said he had affluenza which means he grew up rich and spoiled and did not understand the consequences for

In the media, Ethan Couch is known as the “Affluenza Teen.” Affluenza is defined as “a psychological malaise supposedly affecting wealthy young people, symptoms of which include a lack of motivation, feelings of guilt, and a sense of isolation.” (www.oxforddictionary.com) Throughout Ethan’s life, he never faced any consequences to his actions. Therefore, he was unaware of the damage he would cause by drinking and driving.

In recent years, there have been many cases of the rich “getting away with murder.” One example that I absolutely love is, Ethan Couch.All at the age of 16, Ethan Couch was driving under the influence of stolen beer cases. When he killed 4 people and injured 9 people all together. Couch was then indicted with 4 charges of intoxicated manslaughter, but the judge only gave him 10 years of probation. Since it was argued that he had “affluenza.” Affluenza’s dictionary definition is “a psychological malaise supposedly affecting wealthy young people, symptoms of which include a lack of motivation, feelings of guilt, and a sense of isolation.” This basically gave him a get out jail free card, since his parents were too rich to teach him to be a

Ethan Couch ,a teenage boy, after drinking heavily with friends got in the drivers seat of his pickup truck and started driving. While driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.24, with the state's legal limit for adults being 0.08, he accelerated to speeds around 70 MPH, where he lost control and sideswiped a broke down SUV then continuing on to kill four victims, injure nine others, and crash into the back of another pickup truck. He pled guilty to four counts of intoxication manslaughter. His attorneys claimed that he suffered from affluenza, and the reason he drove while intoxicated was because he didn’t know any better due to the lack of parenting he had because of his parents wealth.

Have you ever lost someone close to you because of a bad decision, or a bad decision someone else made? Drunk driving and driving under the influence of drugs is the leading cause of death in the United States. Everyday 28 people die in the U.S. because of a drunk or drug impaired driver. Everybody makes bad choices, even you and me, but there is a difference between a bad choice and a bad choice that can put others at risk of injury and death.