Ethical And Informative Essay: The Legalization Of Animal Experimentation

It is no secret that millions of animals a year are used for medical experimentation. One study “found the number of animals tested rose from 1,566,994 in 1997 to 2,705,772 in 2012” (Casey). It is my belief that researchers use virtue theory to defend their experimentations. While animal activists approach experimentation through the ethics of care. I am against animal experimentation, but I will also provide insight into why people believe it is ethically just.

Around the world, millions of scientists conduct their studies by testing their research on animals. Many people believe that experimenting on animals is crucial to the advancement of medical discoveries. Studies show however, that animal experimentation is brutal and unnecessary. There are alternatives though: “replacement, reduction, and refinement” (Howard 2).

Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefits. However, what many people tend to forget are the millions of animals that are tortured or killed during the process of these painful, deadly experiments. Many people seem to misunderstand animal nature and the laboratory procedures and techniques that are executed on the animals. The procedures are cruel, unreliable, and harmful. Luckily there are more humane alternatives that have also proved to be less expensive.

Using animals for medical experimentation and education is a controversial subject that often leads to a heated debate. The issues are complex, but the suffering and waste involved in animal experimentation are painfully obvious. Vivisection, the act of cutting into a live animal, has led the nation down countless scientific dead ends, while detracting funds and attention from more applicable scientific research. The practice of animal experimentation at NYU continues, not because it has been proven to be an accurate and reliable means of research (which it has not) but rather, because of tradition and promotion from those with strong vested interests (i.e. Lynne Kiorpes). These values have

“Vivisection on humans and animals dates back to at least the ancient Greeks and Romans” (Evans). It started when Greeks and Romans did experiments on living animals to answer their anatomical questions. In the 1500’s and 1600’s Rene Descartes claimed that animals couldn’t think or feel. During the eighteenth and nineteenth century philosophers debated ethical issues of animal testing.

There are many other ways for people to carry out experiments, other than torturing a human or animal. This article, I affirm, is very beneficial in swaying an individual that is all for animal experiments, and showing them that it is wrong. I, however, have never been an advocate for anything that intentionally inflicts pain on any animal, but there are people that do not care about this issue. This article plants questions in the mind of those that doubt the importance of the lives of animals. With all this being stated, I believe that this article was the most convincing. This article makes me want to become a vegetarian.

Animal experimentation has been a controversial issue amongst scientists and animal activists since the early 1600s (Animal Testing - ProCon.org). When it comes to the topic of animal experimentation, most of us will readily agree that it’s necessary for medical research. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of morality. Whereas some are convinced that it’s unethical and scientifically unnecessary, others maintain that it’s needed for medical progress. My stance on the subject is animal experimentation is fundamental for medical advancement and cancer research.

In the early 18th centuries, a popular idea was launched with the hopes of finding significant scientific animal research. The idea was known as a vivisection, which is defined as “the practice of performing operations on live animals for the purpose of experimentation or scientific research”. By the next century, the idea had taken off and the term “vivisection” was used specifically for people that were completely opposed to the idea of using live animals for cruel and inhumane experiments, researches, and projects. Now in the 21st century, many anti-vivisection society’s exist; including American Anti-Vivisection Society and the National Anti-Vivisection Society, that were both based off the grounds of ending harmful, cruel, and costly scientific experiments on animals.

"The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” In other words, a nation can pass its moral test by treating animals kindly. However, this is rarely the case, especially where animal experimentation is concerned. First, animals feel pain just as much as humans do. And, since better options exist, causing animals’ unnecessary pain is unethical from a scientific perspective. Society should put an end to animal experimentation because animals are sentient beings, there are other alternatives, and its simply bad science; thus, ending animal cruelty will result in a more ethical society.

Every year, millions of animals suffer through painful and unnecessary tests. Animals in laboratories all over the world live lives of deprivation, pain, isolation, and torture. Even though vast studies show that animal experimentation often lacks validity, leading to harmful human reactions, we still continue to use this method of experimentation, while many other less-expensive and more beneficial alternatives exist. Going beyond the issue of animal experimentation being morally wrong, this form of research is also hindering medical progress. Although the use of animals in laboratories is said to be necessary for the welfare and health of humans, people mistakenly believe that this immoral and unscientific method of experimentation is

The worst thing about animal experimentation is the death. One of the many reasons for this unneeded death is this, the ‘Scientists’ treat these animals as lab equipment, even though they are living and breathing. “Nothing more than

The practice of experimentation on live animals as known as vivisection is prevalent since the old roman days. In the name of Science, Animals are being mistreated, exploited and murdered worldwide. Animal are used in experimentation to meet human interest, in research and to test product and this has been a subject of conflicts for decades. Animal-based research is used not only in the field of medicine but also in agriculture, scientific research, and in military experiment. Animal experimentation is believed to be a necessity in the health welfare of human beings and for that, every year over hundred million of animals are being killed for research purposes (USDA). Last year experiments on 2.6 million animals of which only 1266 were used on cosmetic testing (the Australian, 1988.p.14). Before a product is claimed as human-friendly, countless animal friends are being poisoned, tortured or killed. Although people benefits from animal research it is simply against ethical principal. However Medical experiments are regarded quite justifiable since it is driven by necessity while cosmetic testing is not. Therefore, necessary medical testing can be balanced against the

For the past 20 years, there has a been an on going heated debate on whether experiments on animals for the benefit of medical and scientific research is ethical. Whether it is or isn't, most people believe that some form of cost-benefit test should be performed to determine if the action is right. The costs include: animal pain, distress and death where the benefits include the collection of new knowledge or the development of new medical therapies for humans. Looking into these different aspects of the experimentation, there is a large gap for argument between the different scientists' views. In the next few paragraphs, both sides of the argument will be expressed by the supporters.

It is predicted that vivisection will never be replaced. Although many alternatives have been found, animal experimentation will still remain a prominent role in medical research and product testing. Some of the alternatives that are out today include tissue and cell culture studies, cadaver research, and computer simulation. Though these alternatives are considered valuable they do not replace surveying how an intact living organism reacts to certain diseases or toxins. Vitro systems are cultures derived

Animal experimentation by scientists can be cruel and unjust, but at the same time it can provide long term benefits for humanity. Animals used in research and experiments have been going on for 2,000 years and keep is going strong. It is a widely debated about topic all over the world. Some say it is inhuman while others say it’s for the good of human kind. There are many different reasons why people perform experiments and why others total disagree with it.