Ethical Behavior Can Be Defined As Business Principals Essay

Ethics and moral obligations are issues we all encounter at one time or another. In the professional setting, all people should act in a manner that would uphold the good of society. To be ethical, one has to determine their obligations, moral ideas, and moral philosophy (Boatright, p. 19, 2009). The case analysis involving Jacob Franklin was a perfect example of how an individual can face the dilemma of doing what is right or wrong. Businesses have their own code of ethics, and the employees within the business have to determine whether or not they will follow the company’s code of conduct. I will discuss several ethical issues in the case analysis including; failure to report information, remaining silent regarding faulty equipment,

What is principle of justice in acquisition? Our book gives us an analogy concerning basketball player, Wilt Chamberlain that was used by Nozick. The idea

(defendant) accusing them of making her a victim of gender and disability based discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities act and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. United Parcel Service moved for summary judgment and claimed that Young did not have any prove that UPS’s decisions were based on Young’s pregnancy, or that she was differently treaded as other same situated co-workers. Moreover, United Parcel Service said that they were not obligated to offer her accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act because Young’s pregnancy did not create a disability. As result, the district court dismissed Young’s claim. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed. The Fourth Circuit’s judgment and remanded was vacated by the Supreme Court for further

Federal and state laws protect the rights of pregnant workers and ensure that employers treat them the same as all other workers and that their work affairs remain free of prejudice in all areas of employment. Although highly publicized, pregnancy discrimination cases keep occurring by the thousands each year. At the forefront of pregnancy protection is the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (“PDA”) which amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”).

On March 25th, 2015 the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of a former United Parcel Service employee was denied accommodations after she became pregnant. UPS failed to give, Peggy Young, less strenuous work after her medical professional advised she not lift anything heavy during her pregnancy. The justices, voting 6-3, sent the case back to the lower courts to reevaluate UPS’s defense for not to accommodating Young’s needs.

In Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc., the Supreme Court issued a decision and framework on how to resolve a disparate discrimination claim under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA). Here below follows a summary of the case facts and analysis of the Courts decision and its implications. Summary of The Facts Peggy Young, the petitioner, worked as a part-time driver for United Parcel Services, Inc. (UPS).

Your research on the Young v. United Parcel Services Inc. case revealed the importance of employers to comply with Title VII. Indeed, pregnancy is a condition that a company cannot simply choose to ignore in the company’s policy. In addition, Hébert’s (2016) research reveals that the case also reveals critical details about the theory of law behind cases involving pregnancy. For example, the court actually disagreed with Young about the grounds of disparate treatment theory because the theory requires proof of discriminatory intent. While the court ruled in favor of Young due to the stringent test the situation created for UPS, Hébert’s (2016) claims the disparate impact theory provides better protection for pregnancy discrimination because

Women’s organizations, along with feminist and civil rights activists, started a campaign to end such discrimination, to provide protections to pregnant workers, and sought a legislative solution to these problems. Based on the cases and public response, Congress found a gap in the protections provided under Title VII rights and passed the PDA as a direct response. Over the years, various court decisions have built upon the protections provided by the

According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) is an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions constitutes unlawful sex discrimination under Title VII” (Eeoc.gov, 2015). In 2008, this act was not obeyed in the Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. case. Plaintiff Peggy Young, a dedicated UPS truck driver, filed for discrimination under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act after her manger had put her on unpaid leave while she was pregnant. Prior to her leave, she had expressed to her manager she was instructed not to lift any heavy packages, over 20 pounds, from there on out for obvious safety reasons. UPS also told Young that her pregnancy did not qualify her for the “light-duty work” the company assigned other employees in the past; employees with disabilities, injured on the job, and individuals who had lost their driving certification.

2. Ethical Issues in Business. It seems that every day in the news we are hearing of new company that has acted at least unethically and possibly illegally in the operation and financial reporting of their company's business dealings. There are many ethical issues in business. One major issue that we see is over and under reporting net income. Companies like to show that every quarter the net income of the business has an increase or profit. In order to show this they adopt unethical or illegal means in the operation and financial reporting. One such method is the indiscriminate use of stock options for employees that enable companies to take employment costs off balance sheet and inflate earnings. With the recent ethical issues we have

Develop 95% confidence intervals for the proportion of all students, the proportion of all male students, and the proportion of all female students who were involved in some type of cheating.

The confidence interval for proportion of business students of bayview University who cheat is some form is 0.43 to 0.63.

To understand, virtue, ethics, and morality we must first understanding there meanings. According to Boatright, “”morality and ethics are interchangeable; however, they have some subtle differences.” (Ethics and Conduct of Business, Boatright) Webster’s Dictionary describes ethics as the discipline dealing with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation; a set or moral principles. Webster’s Dictionary describes moral as of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior; expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior; conforming to a standard of right behavior; sanctioned by or operative on one's conscience or ethical judgment. Webster’s Dictionary describes

According to the online dictionary, the definition for ethics is the study and evaluation of human conduct in the light of moral principles. The human concern for what is right and wrong, good and bad. Ethics arise from human awareness of the future, combined with a lack of detailed knowledge about it. Lives and actions have to be projected into acknowledged but unknown and future, which at once makes evaluation inevitable: is a possible action right or wrong, wise or stupid, prudential or risky, good or bad? The attribution of value then extends too much else, and produces the characteristic recognition by humans of truth, beauty and kindness, not as contingent or arbitrary, but as independent of the moment which gives rise to them- such

Ethics is the branch of philosophy that deals with the principles correlated to human behavior concerning the rightness and wrongness of specific conduct, and to the good and bad that influences and ends those actions (Ditonary.com, 2011). In other words, ethics is the choice people effect in regards to a decision they need to achieve. Without ethics directing the choice an individual makes, moral preferences of what should or should not be done becomes irrelevant. While ethical decisions are made every day there are two different regions in which these choices are made.